Remembering the Space Age. - Black Vault Radio Network (BVRN)

Remembering the Space Age. - Black Vault Radio Network (BVRN) Remembering the Space Age. - Black Vault Radio Network (BVRN)

documents.theblackvault.com
from documents.theblackvault.com More from this publisher
05.02.2013 Views

258 reMeMBerING the SpaCe aGe science fction flms, such as Fritz Lang’s Metropolis (1926). 16 however, Aelita was in fact not a close adaptation of tolstoy’s Aelita, consequently shifting the central theme of the flm away from science fction. In fact, protazanov’s liberties with the novel’s plot turned the flm into a fantasy melodrama that, while appealing to the public, drew harsh criticism from the ideologically strict party elite. In the movie version of Aelita, the heroes Los and Gusev do travel to Mars and precipitate a worker’s revolution, but the travel takes place in Los’s dream that he has because of his jealousy over his wife.the director turned the export of revolution into a fantasy. his liberties transformed space exploration from a revolutionary activity into the daydreams of an engineer with lingering bourgeois sentiments. Moreover, protazanov’s production dwelled on the corruption and hypocrisy of the Nepmen and pointed out that no one was above the corrupting infuences of poverty. the Martian sequences and Los and Gusev’s travel to the planet are of particular interest for their style and design even though their signifcance to the story is diminished. In contrast to the Soviet-set portions of the movie, which were flmed largely in the streets of Moscow, Mars was represented entirely with the constructivist set. Modern-designed costumes and even the movements of the actors seem to follow the choreography of modernist dance in the manner in which Sergei diagalev’s Les Ballet Russes was popularizing in exile at the same time. Yet protazanov used these modernist images to portray a dream fantasy of a feudal, slave-owning society. By doing so, he broke the intellectual link between the utopian ideal and modernist art that constructivist artists were demonstrating at the time. 17 even though protazanov disassociated the revolutionary notions from space travel, his version of Aelita nonetheless established a standard for fctional space travelers in russian culture. Los, in his dream, discovered his true self through spacefight, even though the fight was imaginary. he discovered that his dreams of spacefight interfered with his acceptance of reality, much in the way that the Nep period had been a step back from revolutionary idealism. the implications of protazanov’s inclusion of modernist and constructivist designs and sets in Aelita merits separate discussion. In many ways, the period 16. Ibid. 17. art historian Christina Kiaer defnes constructivism as “this concept of the ‘socialist object’ as russian Constructivism’s original contribution not only to the history of the political avant-garde art movements of the 20th century, but also to the theory of a noncapitalist form of modernity.” Christina Kiaer, Imagine No Possessions:The Socialist Objects of Russian Constructivism (Cambridge, Ma:the MIt press, 2005), p. 1.“From this it may be concluded that the term ‘Constructivism’ arose in russia during the winter of 1920-1921 as a term specifcally formulated to meet the needs of these new attitudes towards the culture of the future classless society. Strictly speaking, the term should not be used with reference to those works of art which were made prior to the revolution, completely free of any utilitarian content of social commitment on the part of the artist who produced them.” Christina Lodder, Russian Constructivism (New haven, Ct:Yale university press, 1983), p. 3.

258 reMeMBerING <strong>the</strong> SpaCe aGe<br />

science fction flms, such as Fritz Lang’s Metropolis (1926). 16 however, Aelita was<br />

in fact not a close adaptation of tolstoy’s Aelita, consequently shifting <strong>the</strong> central<br />

<strong>the</strong>me of <strong>the</strong> flm away from science fction. In fact, protazanov’s liberties with <strong>the</strong><br />

novel’s plot turned <strong>the</strong> flm into a fantasy melodrama that, while appealing to <strong>the</strong><br />

public, drew harsh criticism from <strong>the</strong> ideologically strict party elite. In <strong>the</strong> movie<br />

version of Aelita, <strong>the</strong> heroes Los and Gusev do travel to Mars and precipitate a<br />

worker’s revolution, but <strong>the</strong> travel takes place in Los’s dream that he has because<br />

of his jealousy over his wife.<strong>the</strong> director turned <strong>the</strong> export of revolution into a<br />

fantasy. his liberties transformed space exploration from a revolutionary activity<br />

into <strong>the</strong> daydreams of an engineer with lingering bourgeois sentiments. Moreover,<br />

protazanov’s production dwelled on <strong>the</strong> corruption and hypocrisy of <strong>the</strong> Nepmen<br />

and pointed out that no one was above <strong>the</strong> corrupting infuences of poverty.<br />

<strong>the</strong> Martian sequences and Los and Gusev’s travel to <strong>the</strong> planet are of<br />

particular interest for <strong>the</strong>ir style and design even though <strong>the</strong>ir signifcance to<br />

<strong>the</strong> story is diminished. In contrast to <strong>the</strong> Soviet-set portions of <strong>the</strong> movie,<br />

which were flmed largely in <strong>the</strong> streets of Moscow, Mars was represented<br />

entirely with <strong>the</strong> constructivist set. Modern-designed costumes and even <strong>the</strong><br />

movements of <strong>the</strong> actors seem to follow <strong>the</strong> choreography of modernist dance<br />

in <strong>the</strong> manner in which Sergei diagalev’s Les Ballet Russes was popularizing in<br />

exile at <strong>the</strong> same time. Yet protazanov used <strong>the</strong>se modernist images to portray<br />

a dream fantasy of a feudal, slave-owning society. By doing so, he broke <strong>the</strong><br />

intellectual link between <strong>the</strong> utopian ideal and modernist art that constructivist<br />

artists were demonstrating at <strong>the</strong> time. 17 even though protazanov disassociated<br />

<strong>the</strong> revolutionary notions from space travel, his version of Aelita none<strong>the</strong>less<br />

established a standard for fctional space travelers in russian culture. Los, in<br />

his dream, discovered his true self through spacefight, even though <strong>the</strong> fight<br />

was imaginary. he discovered that his dreams of spacefight interfered with his<br />

acceptance of reality, much in <strong>the</strong> way that <strong>the</strong> Nep period had been a step<br />

back from revolutionary idealism.<br />

<strong>the</strong> implications of protazanov’s inclusion of modernist and constructivist<br />

designs and sets in Aelita merits separate discussion. In many ways, <strong>the</strong> period<br />

16. Ibid.<br />

17. art historian Christina Kiaer defnes constructivism as “this concept of <strong>the</strong> ‘socialist object’ as<br />

russian Constructivism’s original contribution not only to <strong>the</strong> history of <strong>the</strong> political avant-garde<br />

art movements of <strong>the</strong> 20th century, but also to <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory of a noncapitalist form of modernity.”<br />

Christina Kiaer, Imagine No Possessions:The Socialist Objects of Russian Constructivism (Cambridge,<br />

Ma:<strong>the</strong> MIt press, 2005), p. 1.“From this it may be concluded that <strong>the</strong> term ‘Constructivism’<br />

arose in russia during <strong>the</strong> winter of 1920-1921 as a term specifcally formulated to meet <strong>the</strong><br />

needs of <strong>the</strong>se new attitudes towards <strong>the</strong> culture of <strong>the</strong> future classless society. Strictly speaking,<br />

<strong>the</strong> term should not be used with reference to those works of art which were made prior to<br />

<strong>the</strong> revolution, completely free of any utilitarian content of social commitment on <strong>the</strong> part of<br />

<strong>the</strong> artist who produced <strong>the</strong>m.” Christina Lodder, Russian Constructivism (New haven, Ct:Yale<br />

university press, 1983), p. 3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!