Remembering the Space Age. - Black Vault Radio Network (BVRN)

Remembering the Space Age. - Black Vault Radio Network (BVRN) Remembering the Space Age. - Black Vault Radio Network (BVRN)

documents.theblackvault.com
from documents.theblackvault.com More from this publisher
05.02.2013 Views

150 reMeMBerING the SpaCe aGe Less successful were eforts to employ the concept bureaucratically. Bauer and others, including Minnesota Senator Fritz Mondale, employed SocialIndicators to promote action by the federal government, including the establishment of a Council of Social advisors similar to the Council of economic advisors and more advice to Congress. 64 While such a council did not appear, a bipartisan Congress established the Ofce of technology assessment (Ota) in 1972. Ota lasted until 1995, when terminated by the new republican Congress. aNaLYSIS In his introduction, Mazlish outlined fve issues to address: 1. What were the theoretical problems of historical analogy? 2. What was the impact of the railroad on 19th century america? 3. Could the railroad’s impact be used as a “device of anticipation” to study the impact of the space program? 4. Could this aaaS efort possibly become the prototype of future “impact” studies? 5. Could this volume serve as an example of the difculties involved in organizing such a project? 65 as he noted, this efort was an initial exploration, designed to probe possibilities, not prove. the volume indeed provided a much richer appreciation of the theoretical challenges of creating and using historical analogy as well as the many impacts of the railroad on 19th century america. the grander goals and visions, however, remained unfulflled. the frst two issues were the province of the historian and the most successfully developed. the last three fell into the province of NaSa and the aaaS as well as the historian, and they must be answered either negatively or, to use the Scottish legal concept, not proven. What happened to the last three goals of the aaaS and Railroad? Or, more accurately, what did not happen? Was the problem a lack or loss of aaaS and NaSa support, a lack of efort to link historians with social scientists and NaSa policymakers, or a more fundamental mismatch between historians and policymakers? that is, were the grand aaaS expectations killed by factors beyond their control, executed poorly and thus unsuccessfully, or doomed from the 64. talcott parsons, “report of the president,” Records of the Academy (American Academy of Arts and Sciences), (1968 - 1969), 11; Otis Dudley Duncan, “Developing Social Indicators,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 12 (December 1974), 5096-5102; elmer B. Staats, “Social Indicators and Congressional Needs for Information,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 435 (January 1978): 277-285. 65. Mazlish, op.cit., “preface,” pp. vii-xi.

150 reMeMBerING <strong>the</strong> SpaCe aGe<br />

Less successful were eforts to employ <strong>the</strong> concept bureaucratically. Bauer<br />

and o<strong>the</strong>rs, including Minnesota Senator Fritz Mondale, employed SocialIndicators<br />

to promote action by <strong>the</strong> federal government, including <strong>the</strong> establishment of a<br />

Council of Social advisors similar to <strong>the</strong> Council of economic advisors and<br />

more advice to Congress. 64 While such a council did not appear, a bipartisan<br />

Congress established <strong>the</strong> Ofce of technology assessment (Ota) in 1972.<br />

Ota lasted until 1995, when terminated by <strong>the</strong> new republican Congress.<br />

aNaLYSIS<br />

In his introduction, Mazlish outlined fve issues to address:<br />

1. What were <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical problems of historical analogy?<br />

2. What was <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong> railroad on 19th century america?<br />

3. Could <strong>the</strong> railroad’s impact be used as a “device of anticipation” to<br />

study <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong> space program?<br />

4. Could this aaaS efort possibly become <strong>the</strong> prototype of future<br />

“impact” studies?<br />

5. Could this volume serve as an example of <strong>the</strong> difculties involved in<br />

organizing such a project? 65<br />

as he noted, this efort was an initial exploration, designed to probe<br />

possibilities, not prove. <strong>the</strong> volume indeed provided a much richer appreciation<br />

of <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical challenges of creating and using historical analogy as well<br />

as <strong>the</strong> many impacts of <strong>the</strong> railroad on 19th century america. <strong>the</strong> grander<br />

goals and visions, however, remained unfulflled. <strong>the</strong> frst two issues were <strong>the</strong><br />

province of <strong>the</strong> historian and <strong>the</strong> most successfully developed. <strong>the</strong> last three fell<br />

into <strong>the</strong> province of NaSa and <strong>the</strong> aaaS as well as <strong>the</strong> historian, and <strong>the</strong>y must<br />

be answered ei<strong>the</strong>r negatively or, to use <strong>the</strong> Scottish legal concept, not proven.<br />

What happened to <strong>the</strong> last three goals of <strong>the</strong> aaaS and Railroad? Or, more<br />

accurately, what did not happen? Was <strong>the</strong> problem a lack or loss of aaaS and NaSa<br />

support, a lack of efort to link historians with social scientists and NaSa policymakers,<br />

or a more fundamental mismatch between historians and policymakers?<br />

that is, were <strong>the</strong> grand aaaS expectations killed by factors beyond<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir control, executed poorly and thus unsuccessfully, or doomed from <strong>the</strong><br />

64. talcott parsons, “report of <strong>the</strong> president,” Records of <strong>the</strong> Academy (American Academy of Arts and<br />

Sciences), (1968 - 1969), 11; Otis Dudley Duncan, “Developing Social Indicators,” Proceedings of <strong>the</strong><br />

National Academy of Sciences 12 (December 1974), 5096-5102; elmer B. Staats, “Social Indicators<br />

and Congressional Needs for Information,” Annals of <strong>the</strong> American Academy of Political and Social<br />

Science 435 (January 1978): 277-285.<br />

65. Mazlish, op.cit., “preface,” pp. vii-xi.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!