Remembering the Space Age. - Black Vault Radio Network (BVRN)
Remembering the Space Age. - Black Vault Radio Network (BVRN) Remembering the Space Age. - Black Vault Radio Network (BVRN)
150 reMeMBerING the SpaCe aGe Less successful were eforts to employ the concept bureaucratically. Bauer and others, including Minnesota Senator Fritz Mondale, employed SocialIndicators to promote action by the federal government, including the establishment of a Council of Social advisors similar to the Council of economic advisors and more advice to Congress. 64 While such a council did not appear, a bipartisan Congress established the Ofce of technology assessment (Ota) in 1972. Ota lasted until 1995, when terminated by the new republican Congress. aNaLYSIS In his introduction, Mazlish outlined fve issues to address: 1. What were the theoretical problems of historical analogy? 2. What was the impact of the railroad on 19th century america? 3. Could the railroad’s impact be used as a “device of anticipation” to study the impact of the space program? 4. Could this aaaS efort possibly become the prototype of future “impact” studies? 5. Could this volume serve as an example of the difculties involved in organizing such a project? 65 as he noted, this efort was an initial exploration, designed to probe possibilities, not prove. the volume indeed provided a much richer appreciation of the theoretical challenges of creating and using historical analogy as well as the many impacts of the railroad on 19th century america. the grander goals and visions, however, remained unfulflled. the frst two issues were the province of the historian and the most successfully developed. the last three fell into the province of NaSa and the aaaS as well as the historian, and they must be answered either negatively or, to use the Scottish legal concept, not proven. What happened to the last three goals of the aaaS and Railroad? Or, more accurately, what did not happen? Was the problem a lack or loss of aaaS and NaSa support, a lack of efort to link historians with social scientists and NaSa policymakers, or a more fundamental mismatch between historians and policymakers? that is, were the grand aaaS expectations killed by factors beyond their control, executed poorly and thus unsuccessfully, or doomed from the 64. talcott parsons, “report of the president,” Records of the Academy (American Academy of Arts and Sciences), (1968 - 1969), 11; Otis Dudley Duncan, “Developing Social Indicators,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 12 (December 1974), 5096-5102; elmer B. Staats, “Social Indicators and Congressional Needs for Information,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 435 (January 1978): 277-285. 65. Mazlish, op.cit., “preface,” pp. vii-xi.
- Page 280: 124 reMeMBerING the SpaCe aGe waned
- Page 284: 126 reMeMBerING the SpaCe aGe favor
- Page 288: 128 reMeMBerING the SpaCe aGe posit
- Page 292: 130 reMeMBerING the SpaCe aGe Genev
- Page 296: 132 reMeMBerING the SpaCe aGe the S
- Page 300: 134 reMeMBerING the SpaCe aGe big,
- Page 304: 136 reMeMBerING the SpaCe aGe NaSa
- Page 308: 138 reMeMBerING the SpaCe aGe these
- Page 312: 140 reMeMBerING the SpaCe aGe Raymo
- Page 316: 142 reMeMBerING the SpaCe aGe Explo
- Page 320: 144 reMeMBerING the SpaCe aGe isola
- Page 324: 146 reMeMBerING the SpaCe aGe to a
- Page 328: 148 reMeMBerING the SpaCe aGe StUDI
- Page 334: Great (UNFULFILLeD) expeCtatIONS: t
- Page 338: Great (UNFULFILLeD) expeCtatIONS: t
- Page 342: Part II. remembrance and cultural r
- Page 348: 158 reMeMBerINg the SpaCe age gravi
- Page 352: 160 reMeMBerINg the SpaCe age boost
- Page 356: 162 reMeMBerINg the SpaCe age space
- Page 360: 164 reMeMBerINg the SpaCe age as in
- Page 364: 166 reMeMBerINg the SpaCe age also
- Page 368: 168 reMeMBerINg the SpaCe age a rac
- Page 372: 170 reMeMBerINg the SpaCe age the g
- Page 376: 172 reMeMBerINg the SpaCe age *** a
- Page 380: 174 reMeMBerINg the SpaCe age popul
150 reMeMBerING <strong>the</strong> SpaCe aGe<br />
Less successful were eforts to employ <strong>the</strong> concept bureaucratically. Bauer<br />
and o<strong>the</strong>rs, including Minnesota Senator Fritz Mondale, employed SocialIndicators<br />
to promote action by <strong>the</strong> federal government, including <strong>the</strong> establishment of a<br />
Council of Social advisors similar to <strong>the</strong> Council of economic advisors and<br />
more advice to Congress. 64 While such a council did not appear, a bipartisan<br />
Congress established <strong>the</strong> Ofce of technology assessment (Ota) in 1972.<br />
Ota lasted until 1995, when terminated by <strong>the</strong> new republican Congress.<br />
aNaLYSIS<br />
In his introduction, Mazlish outlined fve issues to address:<br />
1. What were <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical problems of historical analogy?<br />
2. What was <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong> railroad on 19th century america?<br />
3. Could <strong>the</strong> railroad’s impact be used as a “device of anticipation” to<br />
study <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong> space program?<br />
4. Could this aaaS efort possibly become <strong>the</strong> prototype of future<br />
“impact” studies?<br />
5. Could this volume serve as an example of <strong>the</strong> difculties involved in<br />
organizing such a project? 65<br />
as he noted, this efort was an initial exploration, designed to probe<br />
possibilities, not prove. <strong>the</strong> volume indeed provided a much richer appreciation<br />
of <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical challenges of creating and using historical analogy as well<br />
as <strong>the</strong> many impacts of <strong>the</strong> railroad on 19th century america. <strong>the</strong> grander<br />
goals and visions, however, remained unfulflled. <strong>the</strong> frst two issues were <strong>the</strong><br />
province of <strong>the</strong> historian and <strong>the</strong> most successfully developed. <strong>the</strong> last three fell<br />
into <strong>the</strong> province of NaSa and <strong>the</strong> aaaS as well as <strong>the</strong> historian, and <strong>the</strong>y must<br />
be answered ei<strong>the</strong>r negatively or, to use <strong>the</strong> Scottish legal concept, not proven.<br />
What happened to <strong>the</strong> last three goals of <strong>the</strong> aaaS and Railroad? Or, more<br />
accurately, what did not happen? Was <strong>the</strong> problem a lack or loss of aaaS and NaSa<br />
support, a lack of efort to link historians with social scientists and NaSa policymakers,<br />
or a more fundamental mismatch between historians and policymakers?<br />
that is, were <strong>the</strong> grand aaaS expectations killed by factors beyond<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir control, executed poorly and thus unsuccessfully, or doomed from <strong>the</strong><br />
64. talcott parsons, “report of <strong>the</strong> president,” Records of <strong>the</strong> Academy (American Academy of Arts and<br />
Sciences), (1968 - 1969), 11; Otis Dudley Duncan, “Developing Social Indicators,” Proceedings of <strong>the</strong><br />
National Academy of Sciences 12 (December 1974), 5096-5102; elmer B. Staats, “Social Indicators<br />
and Congressional Needs for Information,” Annals of <strong>the</strong> American Academy of Political and Social<br />
Science 435 (January 1978): 277-285.<br />
65. Mazlish, op.cit., “preface,” pp. vii-xi.