05.02.2013 Views

Remembering the Space Age. - Black Vault Radio Network (BVRN)

Remembering the Space Age. - Black Vault Radio Network (BVRN)

Remembering the Space Age. - Black Vault Radio Network (BVRN)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

“<strong>the</strong> ‘rIGht’ StUFF: <strong>the</strong> reaGaN revOLUtION<br />

aND <strong>the</strong> U.S. SpaCe prOGraM”<br />

129<br />

Maxwell W. hunter, II. 26 hunter was a key fgure in promoting what became<br />

SDI; indeed, he, along with three o<strong>the</strong>rs, formed <strong>the</strong> so-called Gang of Four<br />

that pushed <strong>the</strong> concept in Congress.<br />

<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r major fgure was retired Lt. Gen. Danny Graham, who had<br />

advised ronald reagan on national security matters during his gubernatorial<br />

and presidential campaigns. after reagan’s election, using project high Frontier,<br />

help from members of <strong>the</strong> president’s kitchen cabinet, and funding from <strong>the</strong><br />

conservative heritage Foundation, 27 Graham pushed his own version of a spacebased<br />

defense system. Graham felt that by redirecting <strong>the</strong> arms race to space—<br />

where he believed <strong>the</strong> United States held <strong>the</strong> technological advantage—<strong>the</strong><br />

country would achieve a “technological end run” around <strong>the</strong> Soviets and once<br />

again establish U.S. strategic superiority. 28 Once more, a belief in <strong>the</strong> positive<br />

benefts of technological progress drove <strong>the</strong> conservative agenda in space.<br />

reagan was disposed favorably toward antiballistic missile defense and<br />

against MaD, as he made clear several times, even as early as his 1976 bid for<br />

<strong>the</strong> republican nomination. 29 <strong>the</strong> process that led to reagan’s call for creation<br />

of a space-based defense was slow and took many turns over <strong>the</strong> year and a half<br />

between <strong>the</strong> initial September 1981 meeting in Meese’s ofce and reagan’s socalled<br />

Star Wars speech. that story has been told in some detail elsewhere. 30<br />

Despite <strong>the</strong> number of unconventional facets of SDI, it served as a bargaining<br />

chip in arms negotiations, namely in regards to <strong>the</strong> Nuclear and <strong>Space</strong> talks<br />

(NSt) in Geneva, not unlike <strong>the</strong> role of Nixon’s Safeguard in SaLt I talks.<br />

through this diplomatic dialogue, which started in March 1985, <strong>the</strong> United<br />

States hoped to legitimize SDI and push its claims that <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union had<br />

violated <strong>the</strong> 1972 aBM treaty. For its part, <strong>the</strong> U.S.S.r. denounced SDI as an<br />

impediment to arms control, and at <strong>the</strong> reykjavik October 1986 summit talks,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Soviet Union proposed that both sides observe <strong>the</strong> aBM treaty for ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

ten years, including <strong>the</strong> restriction on testing space-based ballistic missile<br />

defense systems outside <strong>the</strong> laboratory. <strong>the</strong> United States refused. In 1987, <strong>the</strong><br />

Soviets “decoupled” <strong>the</strong> SDI from treaty negotiations; ending <strong>the</strong> program<br />

was no longer a prerequisite to an agreement. During September 1987 talks in<br />

26. Baucom, 119; hunter, “Strategic Dynamics and <strong>Space</strong>-Laser Weaponry,” manuscript, October 31,<br />

1977, fle 338, box 13, X-33 archive.<br />

27. Graham, Confessions of a Cold Warrior: An Autobiography (Fairfax, va: preview press, 1995), 118-120;<br />

Baucom, 145-146 & 150; Berman, 67-68; David vogel, Fluctuating Fortunes: The Political Power of<br />

Business in America (New York, NY: Basic Books, 1989), 224-225; Dilys M. hill and phil Williams,<br />

“<strong>the</strong> reagan presidency: Style and Substance,” 11 in hill, raymond a. Moore, and Williams, eds.,<br />

The Reagan Presidency: An Incomplete Revolution? (New York, NY: St. Martin’s press, 1990).<br />

28. pratt, 96; Baucom, 164.<br />

29. pratt, 102, 103 & 104; Baucom, 130.<br />

30. See, for example, Baucom; Graham, Confessions; pratt; Stares; and edward reiss, The Strategic<br />

Defense Initiative (New York, NY: Cambridge University press, 1992).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!