Remembering the Space Age. - Black Vault Radio Network (BVRN)

Remembering the Space Age. - Black Vault Radio Network (BVRN) Remembering the Space Age. - Black Vault Radio Network (BVRN)

documents.theblackvault.com
from documents.theblackvault.com More from this publisher
05.02.2013 Views

xii REMEMBERING the Space Age in culture, we can understand memory as a dynamic cultural force, not a static snapshot of the past.” Refecting on the relation between reality, memory, and meaning, Launius ofers a provocative premise: “Perhaps the reality of what happened does not matter all that much; the only thing that is truly important is the decision about its meaning. That may well be an intensely personal decision predicated on many idiosyncrasies and perspectives.” Remembrance is not simply a pleasant pastime, something to be contemplated at life’s end. Nor is history a luxury, an irrelevance, or a straightforward activity as some people might think. Not without reason does there exist a National Archives in the United States with the words “What is Past is Prologue” scrolled along the top of its impressive façade, this building duplicated in function, if not in detail, in most countries of the world. Not without reason does the Smithsonian Institution strive to display thoughtful commentary in its exhibits, despite criticism from its wide variety of audiences, each with their own interpretations of history. And not without reason does every high school, college, and university teach history. As Wouk said in the context of his novel, “the beginning of the end of War lies in Remembrance.” Whether we learn the lessons of history is another matter. Part III of this volume consists of refections and commentary, where some of the major themes are once again engaged. Walter McDougall views the 50th anniversary of the Space Age as a melancholic afair, flled with disappointment and unfulflled hopes, a secondary activity compared to the dominant trends of contemporary history, and in any case too embryonic to judge its signifcance. John Logsdon disagrees in part, arguing that both the modern nation-state and the global economy depend on space-based systems. The ability to operate in outer space, he contends, is an integral part of modern history. He agrees that the progress of the Space Age has been frustrating in many ways to those who lived through the Apollo era, a level of activity that was not sustainable. Sylvia Kraemer argues there are many competing events that may defne the last 50 years more than space exploration, including the Cold War and digital and information technologies. She also argues that the contribution of space activity to globalization has been far greater than its contribution to nationalism. Linda Billings refects on space exploration in the context of culture, concluding that it means many things to many people, quite aside from dominant ofcial narratives. Nor is this an academic exercise, for she suggests that if space programs are to survive and thrive in the 21st century they need to involve citizens and be aware of the visions they have for a human future in space. On the global level, this resonates with John Krige’s statement that “when ‘Remembering the Space Age,’ we should not shy away from admitting the complexity and diversity of the space efort, nor pretend that the view of the world from Washington is the only view worth recording.” Some in the audience at this 50th anniversary conference thought it should have been more celebratory and described the meeting itself as depressing. Others

xii REMEMBERING <strong>the</strong> <strong>Space</strong> <strong>Age</strong><br />

in culture, we can understand memory as a dynamic cultural force, not a static<br />

snapshot of <strong>the</strong> past.” Refecting on <strong>the</strong> relation between reality, memory, and<br />

meaning, Launius ofers a provocative premise: “Perhaps <strong>the</strong> reality of what<br />

happened does not matter all that much; <strong>the</strong> only thing that is truly important is<br />

<strong>the</strong> decision about its meaning. That may well be an intensely personal decision<br />

predicated on many idiosyncrasies and perspectives.”<br />

Remembrance is not simply a pleasant pastime, something to be contemplated<br />

at life’s end. Nor is history a luxury, an irrelevance, or a straightforward<br />

activity as some people might think. Not without reason does <strong>the</strong>re exist a<br />

National Archives in <strong>the</strong> United States with <strong>the</strong> words “What is Past is Prologue”<br />

scrolled along <strong>the</strong> top of its impressive façade, this building duplicated in function,<br />

if not in detail, in most countries of <strong>the</strong> world. Not without reason does<br />

<strong>the</strong> Smithsonian Institution strive to display thoughtful commentary in its<br />

exhibits, despite criticism from its wide variety of audiences, each with <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

own interpretations of history. And not without reason does every high school,<br />

college, and university teach history. As Wouk said in <strong>the</strong> context of his novel,<br />

“<strong>the</strong> beginning of <strong>the</strong> end of War lies in Remembrance.” Whe<strong>the</strong>r we learn <strong>the</strong><br />

lessons of history is ano<strong>the</strong>r matter.<br />

Part III of this volume consists of refections and commentary, where some<br />

of <strong>the</strong> major <strong>the</strong>mes are once again engaged. Walter McDougall views <strong>the</strong> 50th<br />

anniversary of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Space</strong> <strong>Age</strong> as a melancholic afair, flled with disappointment<br />

and unfulflled hopes, a secondary activity compared to <strong>the</strong> dominant trends of<br />

contemporary history, and in any case too embryonic to judge its signifcance.<br />

John Logsdon disagrees in part, arguing that both <strong>the</strong> modern nation-state and<br />

<strong>the</strong> global economy depend on space-based systems. The ability to operate in<br />

outer space, he contends, is an integral part of modern history. He agrees that<br />

<strong>the</strong> progress of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Space</strong> <strong>Age</strong> has been frustrating in many ways to those who<br />

lived through <strong>the</strong> Apollo era, a level of activity that was not sustainable. Sylvia<br />

Kraemer argues <strong>the</strong>re are many competing events that may defne <strong>the</strong> last 50<br />

years more than space exploration, including <strong>the</strong> Cold War and digital and<br />

information technologies. She also argues that <strong>the</strong> contribution of space activity<br />

to globalization has been far greater than its contribution to nationalism. Linda<br />

Billings refects on space exploration in <strong>the</strong> context of culture, concluding that<br />

it means many things to many people, quite aside from dominant ofcial<br />

narratives. Nor is this an academic exercise, for she suggests that if space<br />

programs are to survive and thrive in <strong>the</strong> 21st century <strong>the</strong>y need to involve<br />

citizens and be aware of <strong>the</strong> visions <strong>the</strong>y have for a human future in space. On<br />

<strong>the</strong> global level, this resonates with John Krige’s statement that “when<br />

‘<strong>Remembering</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Space</strong> <strong>Age</strong>,’ we should not shy away from admitting <strong>the</strong><br />

complexity and diversity of <strong>the</strong> space efort, nor pretend that <strong>the</strong> view of <strong>the</strong><br />

world from Washington is <strong>the</strong> only view worth recording.”<br />

Some in <strong>the</strong> audience at this 50th anniversary conference thought it should<br />

have been more celebratory and described <strong>the</strong> meeting itself as depressing. O<strong>the</strong>rs

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!