05.02.2013 Views

Remembering the Space Age. - Black Vault Radio Network (BVRN)

Remembering the Space Age. - Black Vault Radio Network (BVRN)

Remembering the Space Age. - Black Vault Radio Network (BVRN)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IMaGINING aN aerOSpaCe aGeNCY IN <strong>the</strong> atOMIC aGe<br />

every efort should be made to secure <strong>the</strong>ir elimination in <strong>the</strong> Senate.” 35 <strong>the</strong><br />

inclusion of <strong>the</strong> liaison committees in <strong>the</strong> house bill suggests a strong tendency<br />

to adopt portions of <strong>the</strong> aeC paradigm wholesale. It is particularly remarkable<br />

in this case because <strong>the</strong> civilian-military boundary proposed for NaSa was<br />

quite diferent than <strong>the</strong> model in <strong>the</strong> aeC. that is, NaSa would by default<br />

carry on <strong>the</strong> bulk of aerospace research, but <strong>the</strong> Department of Defense, by<br />

sufciently justifying its need directly to <strong>the</strong> president, could develop its own<br />

aerospace projects. this is in stark contrast to <strong>the</strong> complete monopolization of<br />

basic atomic research by <strong>the</strong> aeC, which necessitated a reliable and clear avenue<br />

of communication to and from <strong>the</strong> military.<br />

<strong>the</strong> diferences between NaSa’s and <strong>the</strong> aeC’s relationships with <strong>the</strong><br />

military deserves elaboration. From <strong>the</strong> beginning, <strong>the</strong> aeC was to encompass<br />

all levels of nuclear research, nuclear materials production, reactor design,<br />

and bomb construction. this centralization was a result of <strong>the</strong> realities of<br />

atomic energy. First, <strong>the</strong> Manhattan District was already in place during <strong>the</strong><br />

establishment of <strong>the</strong> aeC and maintaining its internal confguration was<br />

necessary for <strong>the</strong> uninterrupted production of atomic weapons. Second, and<br />

more important, atomic energy as a technology is unique for a material reason:<br />

<strong>the</strong> regulation of atomic technology is in large part <strong>the</strong> regulation of a single<br />

element and its derivatives. Indeed, <strong>the</strong> atomic energy act categorically<br />

transferred “all right, title, and interest within or under <strong>the</strong> jurisdiction of <strong>the</strong><br />

United States, in or to any fssionable material, now or hereafter produced” to<br />

<strong>the</strong> Commission. In efect, all atoms on U.S. territory with 92 or more protons<br />

were declared to be <strong>the</strong> property of <strong>the</strong> federal government. In addition, an<br />

entire new class of information was created. termed “restricted Data,” this<br />

wide umbrella automatically “classifed at birth” any and “all data concerning<br />

<strong>the</strong> manufacture or utilization of atomic weapons, <strong>the</strong> production of fssionable<br />

material, or <strong>the</strong> use of fssionable material in <strong>the</strong> production of power.” 36<br />

regulation of fssionable material was also <strong>the</strong> assumed primary task of early<br />

atomic weapons nonproliferation eforts. Containment of atomic technology<br />

was seen as synonymous with ownership of nuclear materials.<br />

From <strong>the</strong> inception of <strong>the</strong> aeC <strong>the</strong> production and control of nuclear<br />

materials was <strong>the</strong> prime directive of <strong>the</strong> organization. Fissionable material was<br />

simultaneously obviously dangerous, necessary for national defense, and could<br />

be relatively easily collected and controlled. <strong>the</strong> implication of this material<br />

reality was tremendous for <strong>the</strong> bureaucratization of atomic technology in a<br />

central governmental agency. In <strong>the</strong> case of aerospace technology, such a clear<br />

compartmentalization was not a natural outgrowth of <strong>the</strong> relevant technology.<br />

35. Letter from alan L. Dean to Wiliam Finan, June 2, 1958, folder 12400, NaSa historical<br />

reference Collection, NaSa headquarters,Washington, DC.<br />

36. atomic energy act, 1946. public Law 585, 79th Congress, http://www.osti.gov/atomicenergyact.pdf.<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!