05.02.2013 Views

Remembering the Space Age. - Black Vault Radio Network (BVRN)

Remembering the Space Age. - Black Vault Radio Network (BVRN)

Remembering the Space Age. - Black Vault Radio Network (BVRN)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3<br />

Building <strong>Space</strong> Capability through european<br />

regional Collaboration<br />

John Krige<br />

O n September 26, 2007, <strong>the</strong> widely distributed daily USA Today<br />

published a special feature on <strong>the</strong> dawn of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Space</strong> age. It devoted<br />

more than a full page to <strong>the</strong> launch of Sputnik and to <strong>the</strong> conquest of space,<br />

more than a week before <strong>the</strong> 50th anniversary of <strong>the</strong> Soviet achievement.<br />

USA Today, obviously trying to steal a march on its competitors, also wanted<br />

to intervene in current debates on american space policy, as <strong>the</strong> title of <strong>the</strong><br />

feature, “Lost in <strong>Space</strong>,” made clear. USA Today’s approach was dominated<br />

by two <strong>the</strong>mes: <strong>the</strong> U.S. vs. Soviet competition in <strong>the</strong> space race, of which<br />

<strong>the</strong> newspaper gave a blow-by-blow chronological summary, and which<br />

ended victoriously when Neil armstrong stepped onto <strong>the</strong> Moon; and <strong>the</strong><br />

frustration of “those who were involved at <strong>the</strong> beginning and o<strong>the</strong>rs who<br />

are key to future explorations”—pioneers and visionaries who were<br />

concerned that <strong>the</strong> United States had no long-term and sustainable space<br />

policy. <strong>the</strong> feature in USA Today thus provided both an historical and a<br />

policy-oriented intervention, an attempt to defne a past and to use that<br />

representation of <strong>the</strong> past to shape <strong>the</strong> future.<br />

I do not draw attention to this article because I deem it to be representative;<br />

indeed, a thorough, comparative analysis of how <strong>the</strong> launch of Sputnik and its<br />

aftermath were depicted in <strong>the</strong> world’s press 50 years later awaits scholarly<br />

attention and will, I am sure, be most illuminating. It interests me because it<br />

embodies some of <strong>the</strong> typical traps that lie in wait for those of us who set out to<br />

“remember <strong>the</strong> <strong>Space</strong> age.” three of <strong>the</strong>se are particularly striking.<br />

Firstly, USA Today shrunk <strong>the</strong> content: <strong>the</strong> <strong>Space</strong> age is reduced to human<br />

space fight and <strong>the</strong> competition for space frsts between two superpowers. While<br />

this focus is understandable in a popular daily newspaper, it is also regrettable<br />

It is understandable since human spacefight is a feature of <strong>the</strong> conquest of<br />

space that continues to inspire <strong>the</strong> public’s imagination. It is regrettable because<br />

people are not becoming educated about <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r dimensions of space (i.e.,<br />

space for science, space for applications both civil and military, and space<br />

as a means for building high-tech industry and national competitiveness in<br />

<strong>the</strong> aerospace sector). public support for human space exploration may be,<br />

according to roger Launius in <strong>the</strong> same edition of USA Today, “a mile wide

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!