Minerals Report - International Seabed Authority

Minerals Report - International Seabed Authority Minerals Report - International Seabed Authority

05.02.2013 Views

18. J. Malnic. (1999). Marine Mineral Development and Governance – Industry, Research and Government in Offshore Minerals Policy Workshop 22-26 February 1999, Mandang Papua New Guinea. SOPAC Miscellaneous Report 323: 68-73. 19. South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission, (1999). GIS and Remote Sensing SOPAC Policy Paper. SOPAC Miscellaneous Report 326: 11p. 20. Japan International Co-operation Agency, Metal Mining Agency of Japan, South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission. (1995). South Pacific Seafloor Atlas: Japan-SOPAC cooperative. 21. Study on Deep-sea Mineral Resources in the South Pacific 1985 – 1994. JICA, MMAJ: 24 plates. (SOPAC Joint Contribution) 22. South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission. (1999). Offshore Minerals Policy Workshop, 22-26 February 1999, Mandang, Papua New Guinea. SOPAC Miscellaneous Report 323: 134p. INTERNATIONAL SEABED AUTHORITY 908

The Mandang Guidelines ANNEX I 1. As appropriate, nations should take relevant measures to ensure the provisions of the 1982 Convention become fully implemented within their jurisdictions. 2. Nations should move forward rapidly to delineate the baselines from which the various jurisdictional zones under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) (“1982 Convention”) are measured and to deposit the appropriate charts and list of co-ordinates with the United Nations. 3. In the case of potential extensions of the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles, these data should also be gathered as soon as possible and the appropriate claims filed (bearing in mind the 10-year limit from the date of ratification by the coastal state). 4. Measures should be taken to designate archipelagic and other sea-lanes for the purpose of navigation in accordance with the 1982 Convention and other international conventions. 5. Nations should proceed to select their preferred dispute resolution mechanism as required under the 1982 Convention. 6. In the interests of consistency and simplicity of administration, the unique nature of offshore mineral development activities and the diverse nature of stakeholder interests, coastal states should develop a comprehensive `Offshore Mining Act,’ where appropriate, as a distinct country-specific regime which is separate from their existing on land mining acts. 7. The “risk” components associated with the exploration and exploitation of offshore mineral resources should be assessed and considered in the development of an appropriate licensing and fiscal regime. INTERNATIONAL SEABED AUTHORITY 909

The Mandang Guidelines<br />

ANNEX I<br />

1. As appropriate, nations should take relevant measures to ensure the<br />

provisions of the 1982 Convention become fully implemented within<br />

their jurisdictions.<br />

2. Nations should move forward rapidly to delineate the baselines from<br />

which the various jurisdictional zones under the United Nations<br />

Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) (“1982 Convention”) are<br />

measured and to deposit the appropriate charts and list of co-ordinates<br />

with the United Nations.<br />

3. In the case of potential extensions of the continental shelf beyond 200<br />

nautical miles, these data should also be gathered as soon as possible<br />

and the appropriate claims filed (bearing in mind the 10-year limit from<br />

the date of ratification by the coastal state).<br />

4. Measures should be taken to designate archipelagic and other sea-lanes<br />

for the purpose of navigation in accordance with the 1982 Convention<br />

and other international conventions.<br />

5. Nations should proceed to select their preferred dispute resolution<br />

mechanism as required under the 1982 Convention.<br />

6. In the interests of consistency and simplicity of administration, the<br />

unique nature of offshore mineral development activities and the<br />

diverse nature of stakeholder interests, coastal states should develop a<br />

comprehensive `Offshore Mining Act,’ where appropriate, as a distinct<br />

country-specific regime which is separate from their existing on land<br />

mining acts.<br />

7. The “risk” components associated with the exploration and exploitation<br />

of offshore mineral resources should be assessed and considered in the<br />

development of an appropriate licensing and fiscal regime.<br />

INTERNATIONAL SEABED AUTHORITY 909

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!