Minerals Report - International Seabed Authority
Minerals Report - International Seabed Authority Minerals Report - International Seabed Authority
He said that the environment has to be protected at all times during the tenure of the concession. As part of his concluding remarks, Dr. Viera de Macedo pointed out that offshore mining in Brazil is very recent phenomenon. He noted that the regulations for offshore prospecting, exploration and exploitation of petroleum and natural gas have only recently come into force. He said that environmental regulations for offshore mining in Brazil are considered very stringent and among the most advanced in the world. He noted however that the concerned institutions are not that well prepared to deal with them. He said that Petrobras works within this legal framework like any other authorised company with no privileges that result from it being state owned. He said that Petrobras sees itself as having an educational role in the development and establishment of the new legal framework. In conclusion, Dr. Viera de Macedo presented the International Seabed Authority with the offshore regulations of Brazil. SUMMARY OF THE DISCUSSIONS The discussions that followed Dr. Viera de Macedo’s presentation focussed on the environmental impact of fixed versus floating platforms, the length of time required to deploy the pipeline from the vessel to the Christmas tree, and the competitiveness of its offshore policy for petroleum and natural gas. A participant asked about the nature of environmental impacts of fixed and floating platforms on the seabed. Dr. Viera de Macedo explained that fixed platforms were utilized in shallower waters near the coast while floating platforms were used in deeper waters. He said that not much impact has been observed in either case. He said that fish appear to be attracted to the platforms. He said that in general along with the frequent gas flares, the surrounding waters are heated slightly. This does not appear to impact the INTERNATIONAL SEABED AUTHORITY 846
fish around the platforms. He said that the major problem has been fishermen in their vessels that come after the fish. He said that these vessels sometimes get in the way of operations. In response to another question about the impact of the platforms on the seabed in deeper waters, Dr. Viera pointed out that since the platforms are floating, the only equipment in contact with the seabed are the Christmas trees. One participant wanted to know the length of time required to deploy the pipeline from the vessel to the Christmas tree. Dr. Viera de Macedo said that he was not sure what the answer is. He suggested that it could be two or three days. In view of the number of ordinances relevant to the petroleum industry that Dr. Viera de Macedo had referred to, another participant wanted to know if they came under the jurisdiction of a single agency. If not, this participant wanted to know how investors were facilitated through the process. It was also pointed out that because of provisions in the regulations on the Government’s take, that included items such as special participation, deductions and fees, the overall take of companies would be relatively small for the operator and investor. In this light, it was suggested that perhaps the framework is not as competitive and attractive as one might want, in particular since Petrobras still appeared to be a state monopoly. Dr. Viera de Macedo was asked what incentives were provided to investors other than Petrobras, and what the Government of Brazil actually obtained from operators. With regard to the ordinances relevant to the petroleum industry, Dr. Viera de Macedo said that two agencies were involved in the process. These were ANP and the environmental agency. He said that ANP falls under the jurisdiction of the Minister of Mines and Energy, and that the environmental agency was under the Ministry of the Environment. He said that ANP was responsible for concessionaires. Dr. Viera de Macedo reiterated that Petrobras is no longer a monopoly. He said that there had been two rounds of bidding since the new law entered into force. He pointed out that several companies entered bids in both rounds. In 2000, for example, Dr. Viera de Macedo said that 44 companies submitted INTERNATIONAL SEABED AUTHORITY 847
- Page 804 and 805: 1 4. Data Management All data relat
- Page 806 and 807: possibility to evaluate the results
- Page 808 and 809: planning of future activities. The
- Page 810 and 811: SUMMARY OF THE PRESENTATION ON THE
- Page 812 and 813: in the Barents Sea there is still a
- Page 814 and 815: period that can last up to ten year
- Page 816 and 817: conditions in these areas, as well
- Page 818 and 819: designated by the Ministry. She sai
- Page 820 and 821: quantity of data involved in the in
- Page 822 and 823: operation (PDO) is normally prepare
- Page 824 and 825: to the data when an area is relinqu
- Page 826 and 827: CHAPTER 20 STATUS REPORT ON THE DAT
- Page 828 and 829: All the above-mentioned minerals oc
- Page 830 and 831: e water depths between 400 and 1,00
- Page 832 and 833: As far as the Government is concern
- Page 834 and 835: • Ordinance number 195, of Decemb
- Page 836 and 837: This tax must be paid up to January
- Page 838 and 839: the one whose burning is authorised
- Page 840 and 841: ANP may send a representative to fo
- Page 842 and 843: esources other than oil or natural
- Page 844 and 845: to the safety of persons and animal
- Page 846 and 847: found offshore Brazil. With regard
- Page 848 and 849: een discovered in the basin, includ
- Page 850 and 851: enhance oil recovery. He said that
- Page 852 and 853: g. Ordinance number 10 that regulat
- Page 856 and 857: ids. These comprised five Brazilian
- Page 858 and 859: After oil exploration gained moment
- Page 860 and 861: Those who are entitled to the land
- Page 862 and 863: and replaced by the President, and
- Page 864 and 865: (ii) Assure the safety of navigatio
- Page 866 and 867: explorations may continue concurren
- Page 868 and 869: Appoint an authorized representativ
- Page 870 and 871: The contractor will recover all ope
- Page 872 and 873: of US dollar... (negotiable) within
- Page 874 and 875: Processing of products is subject t
- Page 876 and 877: are more than 30 articles in the va
- Page 878 and 879: SUMMARY OF THE PRESENTATION AND DIS
- Page 880 and 881: Ambassador Djalal informed particip
- Page 882 and 883: production-sharing contracts became
- Page 884 and 885: said that the remainder of the prod
- Page 886 and 887: and cooperation with Pertamina and
- Page 888 and 889: A participant wanted to know whethe
- Page 890 and 891: of CCOP/SOPAC was to promote and de
- Page 892 and 893: STAR was founded in 1985 in collabo
- Page 894 and 895: Since 1972, SOPAC has, on behalf of
- Page 896 and 897: France Seapso 1985-1986 Cook Is, Fi
- Page 898 and 899: polymetallic massive sulphides. The
- Page 900 and 901: crusts have also been found in area
- Page 902 and 903: Figure 2: Location Map of Known Pol
fish around the platforms. He said that the major problem has been fishermen<br />
in their vessels that come after the fish. He said that these vessels sometimes<br />
get in the way of operations. In response to another question about the<br />
impact of the platforms on the seabed in deeper waters, Dr. Viera pointed out<br />
that since the platforms are floating, the only equipment in contact with the<br />
seabed are the Christmas trees.<br />
One participant wanted to know the length of time required to deploy<br />
the pipeline from the vessel to the Christmas tree. Dr. Viera de Macedo said<br />
that he was not sure what the answer is. He suggested that it could be two or<br />
three days.<br />
In view of the number of ordinances relevant to the petroleum<br />
industry that Dr. Viera de Macedo had referred to, another participant wanted<br />
to know if they came under the jurisdiction of a single agency. If not, this<br />
participant wanted to know how investors were facilitated through the<br />
process. It was also pointed out that because of provisions in the regulations<br />
on the Government’s take, that included items such as special participation,<br />
deductions and fees, the overall take of companies would be relatively small<br />
for the operator and investor. In this light, it was suggested that perhaps the<br />
framework is not as competitive and attractive as one might want, in<br />
particular since Petrobras still appeared to be a state monopoly. Dr. Viera de<br />
Macedo was asked what incentives were provided to investors other than<br />
Petrobras, and what the Government of Brazil actually obtained from<br />
operators.<br />
With regard to the ordinances relevant to the petroleum industry, Dr.<br />
Viera de Macedo said that two agencies were involved in the process. These<br />
were ANP and the environmental agency. He said that ANP falls under the<br />
jurisdiction of the Minister of Mines and Energy, and that the environmental<br />
agency was under the Ministry of the Environment. He said that ANP was<br />
responsible for concessionaires.<br />
Dr. Viera de Macedo reiterated that Petrobras is no longer a monopoly. He<br />
said that there had been two rounds of bidding since the new law entered into<br />
force. He pointed out that several companies entered bids in both rounds. In<br />
2000, for example, Dr. Viera de Macedo said that 44 companies submitted<br />
INTERNATIONAL SEABED AUTHORITY 847