05.02.2013 Views

Minerals Report - International Seabed Authority

Minerals Report - International Seabed Authority

Minerals Report - International Seabed Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

unquestionably be alarming, and the future of the industry could be in<br />

doubt. However, in the continental shelf environment studied by DBM, it<br />

can be demonstrated that sterilisation does not occur, based on both<br />

conventional sampling, which indicates that recovery can occur in 4 to 8<br />

years and from submersible-based visual observation.<br />

More recently direct seafloor observations have indicated that in<br />

some instances mining disturbance can promote environmental<br />

enhancement, for example by resulting in increased habitats through<br />

surface rock exposure for rockfish such as false jacopever [9]. Non-west<br />

coast examples of environmental enhancement have also been reported,<br />

principally by environmental studies linked to the aggregate dredging<br />

industry on the Scotia Shelf of Canada, where environmental enhancement<br />

has resulted in improvement of lobster habitat [35]. In other instances,<br />

dredging practices are being reviewed to examine the possibility of<br />

deliberately creating new fishery habitats where future aggregate<br />

extraction is being planned [36]. It is too early to determine whether<br />

similar effects are resulting from deepwater diamond mining on the west<br />

coast of southern Africa.<br />

3.3.4 Impact of Resedimentation and Artificial Plumes<br />

Offshore diamond mining generates a plume of suspended<br />

sediment at the surface. The direction the plume travels as the material<br />

settles changes with depth. Transport is to the northwest at surface and to<br />

the south at depth [37].<br />

The analysis of Jago video transects has provided clear evidence of<br />

impact on the epifaunal species diversity, richness and total abundance at<br />

sites surrounding those areas impacted directly by mining tool<br />

disturbance [28]. The research indicates that there is a minimum distance<br />

(100 to 200 m generally) from mining sites beyond which the epifauna is<br />

not negatively impacted by mining activity (Figure 4). Similar<br />

relationships have been noted in numerous studies of pollution in the<br />

marine, freshwater and terrestrial environments.<br />

The research findings based on visual observation are less<br />

conclusive in terms of the infaunal communities, as it is currently difficult<br />

to determine which organisms are responsible for the different types of<br />

holes and mounds observed. It is however clear that the density of<br />

burrows is significantly less in mined sites than it is in those furthest from<br />

INTERNATIONAL SEABED AUTHORITY 640

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!