Minerals Report - International Seabed Authority
Minerals Report - International Seabed Authority Minerals Report - International Seabed Authority
prospecting would be more applicable in the case of these two types of mineral deposits. SUMMARY OF THE EXCHANGE OF VIEWS. Following the Secretary-General’s presentation, participants exchanged views on a number of the matters that he had raised. The exchange of views focussed on the differences between seafloor massive sulphides and crusts deposits, and polymetallic nodules, the costs involved in delineating deposits of the two new types of deposits, the rights of prospectors, whether the Authority should devise a single new mechanism for all other resources of the Area based on the common heritage principle in order to circumvent years of negotiation each time a new mineral is discovered, and alternates to the parallel system as framed for polymetallic nodules such as a carried interest in operations for the Authority. Discussions on estimates of equal commercial value, differences between evaluating seafloor massive sulphides, cobalt-rich ferromanganese crusts and polymetallic nodule deposits, and prospector’s rights. Discussions on the differences between seafloor massive sulphides, cobalt-rich ferromanganese crusts and polymetallic nodules originated from a consideration of the need to submit two sites of estimated equal commercial value. One participant said that the matter was one of technicalities because it should not be too difficult for a prospective applicant for exploration to submit two sites of equal estimated commercial value to the Authority whether for seafloor massive sulphides or cobalt-rich ferromanganese crusts deposits. In the case of cobalt-rich crusts deposits, this participant said that from a layman’s point of view, the primary issue would be to find seamounts containing these deposits. After that he continued, one seamount might contain crusts that are 25 cm thick, and the other seamount crusts that might be 10 cm thick. The size of areas submitted in respect of these two sites might then be 10 sq km and 25 sq km respectively, to satisfy the requirement to submit two sites of equal estimated commercial value. This participant pointed out that the same requirement has been made for polymetallic INTERNATIONAL SEABED AUTHORITY 474
nodules exploration. He pointed out that in the case of nodules, the interested entities started from scratch, and without any laws to protect their investments. He said that the entities that were interested in developing nodule resources took the financial risk to prospect the Area for polymetallic nodule deposits. Referring to the minimum expenditure requirement for registration as a pioneer investor of US$30 million (1982) as provided for in Resolution II of the Convention, he also said that the concerned entities had already gathered the information required to prove that the two sites were of equal commercial value. The participant however made the observation that at present it appeared unlikely that any potential applicant would risk tens of millions of dollars without the assurance that it would be authorized to continue to develop a mine. As a result, this participant suggested that the Authority should invent a system that protects this initial investment stage of the development of these resources by issuing “an exclusive prospecting right”, so that the applicant could start its operation in a broad area. Later, the area could be split in two. Another participant made the observation that the situation described for the polymetallic nodule regime was different. This participant said that the system for polymetallic nodules worked because prospecting and prospected areas were kept secret. He emphasized this point by referring to the considerable amount of overlaps in prospected areas in the Clarion- Clipperton zone. He further added that it required seven years of negotiations by those concerned to yield a complicated result. This participant expressed support for providing prospectors for seafloor massive sulphides and cobalt-rich ferromanganese crusts with an assurance and guarantee that protect their investments, and a priority right to mineable areas within which prospecting is to occur. In response to a question whether a pioneer status was being requested, this participant responded by saying that what is sought is an opportunity for prospectors to start prospecting and to acquire sufficient data in order to fulfil the parallel system. This participant stated that the period during which the prospected area is protected would be to enable the operator to acquire the data necessary to identify two areas of equal commercial value. Another participant noted that there is a big difference between twodimensional deposits like polymetallic nodule deposits and the three- INTERNATIONAL SEABED AUTHORITY 475
- Page 432 and 433: CHAPTER 11 A COMPARISON OF THE POSS
- Page 434 and 435: This paper proposes to compare the
- Page 436 and 437: • The distance between the mining
- Page 438 and 439: economic value. Phosphatisation has
- Page 440 and 441: The morphology of the mineral edifi
- Page 442 and 443: Table 3: Geochemistry of known mass
- Page 444 and 445: Detailed exploration has not been c
- Page 446 and 447: flotation, can separate the ferroma
- Page 448 and 449: The crushed and ground ore can be c
- Page 450 and 451: 3.2. Assumptions made for each kind
- Page 452 and 453: alloys or even manganese ore in the
- Page 454 and 455: ought the nickel price to a top. Th
- Page 456 and 457: Because the metal market economy is
- Page 458 and 459: 14. J. -P. Lenoble (1992), Future d
- Page 460 and 461: 31. J. Francheteau, D. Needham, P.
- Page 462 and 463: 48. J. -P. Lenoble (1996), Les nodu
- Page 464 and 465: 66. J. -J. Prédali and J. -P. Polg
- Page 466 and 467: classification system, Mr. Lenoble
- Page 468 and 469: To recapitulate the sizes and possi
- Page 470 and 471: proposed processing technologies an
- Page 472 and 473: international community is only jus
- Page 474 and 475: Part 2 ISSUES TO BE TAKEN INTO ACCO
- Page 476 and 477: The Secretary-General said that the
- Page 478 and 479: Mr. Nandan pointed out that the nex
- Page 480 and 481: problems would resurface, because i
- Page 484 and 485: dimensional seafloor massive sulphi
- Page 486 and 487: workshop, in relation to deposit ev
- Page 488 and 489: an economic perspective, including
- Page 490 and 491: sulphides and cobalt-rich ferromang
- Page 492 and 493: CHAPTER 13 PETROLEUM POTENTIAL AND
- Page 494 and 495: structure and filled with sediments
- Page 496 and 497: Basin groups are subdivided into ty
- Page 498 and 499: during the late Mesozoic-Cenozoic s
- Page 500 and 501: Figure 4: Volume density of initial
- Page 502 and 503: ITIPRHC = Vnr φHC γ 103 (Mmtoe),
- Page 504 and 505: Table 1: Offshore (deepwater) initi
- Page 506 and 507: Speaking about particular geographi
- Page 508 and 509: World Ocean, including areas off no
- Page 510 and 511: Table 4: Largest oil and gas discov
- Page 512 and 513: The extremely harsh environment bro
- Page 514 and 515: In other regions of the world, enco
- Page 516 and 517: REFERENCES 1. L.G. Weeks (1971), Ma
- Page 518 and 519: SUMMARY OF PRESENTATION AND DISCUSS
- Page 520 and 521: Dr. Vysotsky said that estimates of
- Page 522 and 523: In Southeast Asia, Dr. Vysotsky spo
- Page 524 and 525: Philippines, and possibly Brazil. W
- Page 526 and 527: and we shall encounter severe deple
- Page 528 and 529: In the 1960's scientists discovered
- Page 530 and 531: Figure 2. Worldwide locations of kn
nodules exploration. He pointed out that in the case of nodules, the interested<br />
entities started from scratch, and without any laws to protect their<br />
investments. He said that the entities that were interested in developing<br />
nodule resources took the financial risk to prospect the Area for polymetallic<br />
nodule deposits. Referring to the minimum expenditure requirement for<br />
registration as a pioneer investor of US$30 million (1982) as provided for in<br />
Resolution II of the Convention, he also said that the concerned entities had<br />
already gathered the information required to prove that the two sites were of<br />
equal commercial value. The participant however made the observation that<br />
at present it appeared unlikely that any potential applicant would risk tens of<br />
millions of dollars without the assurance that it would be authorized to<br />
continue to develop a mine. As a result, this participant suggested that the<br />
<strong>Authority</strong> should invent a system that protects this initial investment stage of<br />
the development of these resources by issuing “an exclusive prospecting<br />
right”, so that the applicant could start its operation in a broad area. Later,<br />
the area could be split in two.<br />
Another participant made the observation that the situation described<br />
for the polymetallic nodule regime was different. This participant said that<br />
the system for polymetallic nodules worked because prospecting and<br />
prospected areas were kept secret. He emphasized this point by referring to<br />
the considerable amount of overlaps in prospected areas in the Clarion-<br />
Clipperton zone. He further added that it required seven years of<br />
negotiations by those concerned to yield a complicated result. This participant<br />
expressed support for providing prospectors for seafloor massive sulphides<br />
and cobalt-rich ferromanganese crusts with an assurance and guarantee that<br />
protect their investments, and a priority right to mineable areas within which<br />
prospecting is to occur. In response to a question whether a pioneer status<br />
was being requested, this participant responded by saying that what is sought<br />
is an opportunity for prospectors to start prospecting and to acquire sufficient<br />
data in order to fulfil the parallel system. This participant stated that the<br />
period during which the prospected area is protected would be to enable the<br />
operator to acquire the data necessary to identify two areas of equal<br />
commercial value.<br />
Another participant noted that there is a big difference between twodimensional<br />
deposits like polymetallic nodule deposits and the three-<br />
INTERNATIONAL SEABED AUTHORITY 475