Minerals Report - International Seabed Authority

Minerals Report - International Seabed Authority Minerals Report - International Seabed Authority

05.02.2013 Views

This paper proposes to compare the economic merit of the three types of deposits that have been proposed as possible deep-sea mineral resources: • Polymetallic nodules, • Cobalt-rich crusts, • Massive sulphides. There are significant disparities between these deposits with regards to the level of acquired exploration data and the availability of adequate mining and processing technologies. 2. Characteristics of deep-sea mineral deposits 2.1. Parameters to consider Many parameters have to be taken into account when trying to determine the mineability of a deposit. We will consider only some of them and try to determine the reliability of the available information for each type of deposit: • Parameters needed to estimate the tonnage and metal content of the deposit, • State of the art of the mining and processing technologies. 2.2. Evaluation of tonnage and metal content 2.2.1. Polymetallic nodules These deposits were intensively investigated during the seventies and the eighties. They are still the subject of important programmes of research and development in several countries. A considerable amount of publications is available on the matter. However, few give reliable information on the estimation of economic resource. The competition between the first pioneer investors, when no legal framework was internationally accepted, prevented the diffusion of what was considered as proprietary information. INTERNATIONAL SEABED AUTHORITY 426

J. Mero had evaluated the total amount of polymetallic nodules lying on the sea floor to more than 1.5 x 10 12 tonnes in 1965 [5]. This estimation was reduced to 5 x 10 11 tonnes by A. Archer in 1981 [6]. However, not all nodule fields are eligible for potential mining. Several attempts were made to calculate the probable resources for (near!) future development. The approach was to determine the number of “mining sites” that the World Ocean could accommodate. A mining site was defined as a portion of the seabed where a commercial operation could be maintained during 20-25 years with a production of 1.5 to 4 x 10 6 tonnes per year of “good nodules”. Good nodules were those containing an average of 1.25-1.5% nickel and 1-1.4% copper, in addition to 27-30% manganese and 0.2- 0.25% cobalt. The estimate of the number of sites varied from 8 to 225, which corresponds to a total amount of inferred resources between 480 x 10 6 to 13,500 x 10 6 tonnes [6-10]. Further considerations, on the capacity of the world metal markets to absorb production from this source in the first 20 years of operation along with and more severe mining requirements, reduced this range to 3-10 mining sites with a tonnage of 100-600 10 6 tonnes [11]. These are estimates of “speculative inferred resources”. From 1984 to 1989, the French group Afernod 1 /Gemonod 2 carried out an extensive pre-feasibility study, whose results have been published. It constitutes the basis for the following assumptions on a polymetallic nodule deposit that might be suitable for a possible commercial operation [12-14]: • The depth of the ocean floor in the area varies from 4,800 m to 5,200 m. The topography is formed of long dissymmetric hills. Their crests are orientated north-south, spaced by 2-5 km, and dominate the lower parts by 100-300 m. Slopes are less than 10% in more than 70% of the area, but vertical cliffs, sometimes 40 m high, have been identified on the flanks of the hills. In some places, potholes 100 to 1,000 m wide and 40 m deep have been observed. 1/ Association Française pour l’Etude et la Recherche des Nodules (AFERNOD). 2/ Groupement d'intérêt Public formed in 1983 by IFREMER, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique and Technicatome. A parent organisation of AFERNOD. INTERNATIONAL SEABED AUTHORITY 427

J. Mero had evaluated the total amount of polymetallic nodules lying<br />

on the sea floor to more than 1.5 x 10 12 tonnes in 1965 [5]. This estimation was<br />

reduced to 5 x 10 11 tonnes by A. Archer in 1981 [6]. However, not all nodule<br />

fields are eligible for potential mining. Several attempts were made to<br />

calculate the probable resources for (near!) future development. The approach<br />

was to determine the number of “mining sites” that the World Ocean could<br />

accommodate. A mining site was defined as a portion of the seabed where a<br />

commercial operation could be maintained during 20-25 years with a<br />

production of 1.5 to 4 x 10 6 tonnes per year of “good nodules”. Good nodules<br />

were those containing an average of 1.25-1.5% nickel and 1-1.4% copper, in<br />

addition to 27-30% manganese and 0.2- 0.25% cobalt. The estimate of the<br />

number of sites varied from 8 to 225, which corresponds to a total amount of<br />

inferred resources between 480 x 10 6 to 13,500 x 10 6 tonnes [6-10]. Further<br />

considerations, on the capacity of the world metal markets to absorb<br />

production from this source in the first 20 years of operation along with and<br />

more severe mining requirements, reduced this range to 3-10 mining sites<br />

with a tonnage of 100-600 10 6 tonnes [11]. These are estimates of “speculative<br />

inferred resources”.<br />

From 1984 to 1989, the French group Afernod 1 /Gemonod 2 carried out<br />

an extensive pre-feasibility study, whose results have been published. It<br />

constitutes the basis for the following assumptions on a polymetallic nodule<br />

deposit that might be suitable for a possible commercial operation [12-14]:<br />

• The depth of the ocean floor in the area varies from 4,800 m to 5,200 m.<br />

The topography is formed of long dissymmetric hills. Their crests are<br />

orientated north-south, spaced by 2-5 km, and dominate the lower<br />

parts by 100-300 m. Slopes are less than 10% in more than 70% of the<br />

area, but vertical cliffs, sometimes 40 m high, have been identified on<br />

the flanks of the hills. In some places, potholes 100 to 1,000 m wide and<br />

40 m deep have been observed.<br />

1/ Association Française pour l’Etude et la Recherche des Nodules (AFERNOD).<br />

2/ Groupement d'intérêt Public formed in 1983 by IFREMER, Commissariat à<br />

l'Energie Atomique and Technicatome. A parent organisation of AFERNOD.<br />

INTERNATIONAL SEABED AUTHORITY 427

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!