Minerals Report - International Seabed Authority

Minerals Report - International Seabed Authority Minerals Report - International Seabed Authority

05.02.2013 Views

former case a reminder notice is sent out that usually get a favourable response while the latter may result in the licence being terminated or not renewed. A major difficulty confronting the Government is not so much with reporting but auditing the report and the actual work undertaken during the term of an exploration licence. An audit will assist the Government to determine how much money was actually spent on exploration and how much on other expenses including overheads. Currently there is deficiency in the capacity to undertake this auditing task. As a consequence, a consultant is anticipated to be engaged to fill this capacity gap and to transfer the know-how under the Institutional Strengthening Project to be funded by the World Bank in the next few years. As regards data and information reporting requirements in the offshore there are only two licences held by the same company. While the reporting requirement is governed by the Mining Act 1992 for the time being it is really a dilemma to ascertain what constitutes exploration in the offshore. As these two licences are in the process of renewal , no more could be said at this stage. However, it would be noted that the situation will become clearer if there were clear definitions of marine mineral exploration and marine scientific research as most of the resource data generated to date are from MSR. Unfortunately no help can be found in the UNCLOS. Perhaps as a passing remark this may be an aspect that the Legal and Technical Committee of the International Seabed Authority may wish to take up in the near future. 6. Conclusion Offshore prospecting and exploration are relatively difficult given the unique ocean environment. It follows that conventional data and information reporting requirements may not necessarily apply. INTERNATIONAL SEABED AUTHORITY 368

However, the full extent of the offshore reporting requirements will only be known when the offshore minerals policy is finalised, legislation put in place, and potential investors granted prospecting and exploration licences. It is very obvious that the data and information are required for various purposes including ascertaining availability and extent of the mineral resource, monitoring compliance, and potential economic exploitation of offshore minerals in particular polymetallic massive sulphide deposits in the future should circumstances permit. As the extent of resources hence reserves is a key requirement if there is to be a marine mining project involving polymetallic massive sulphides deposits, in the future both MSR and offshore mineral prospecting and exploration will be encouraged under the proposed Offshore Mining Policy for PNG. SELECTED REFERENCES 1. Allen Clark, “Offshore Mineral Resources Potential of Pacific Nations”, a paper presented at the regional workshop on Offshore Minerals Policy, Madang, 22-26 February 1999. This paper and others are reproduced in SOPAC Miscellaneous Report 323 under the title Offshore Mineral Policy Workshop Madang, PNG Workshop Report, Suva, April 1999. 2. Bank of Papua New Guinea, Quarterly Economic Bulletin, Port Moresby, various issues. 3. Charles L. Morgan, “Environmental Impact Assessment for Deep-sea Mining”, a paper presented at the regional workshop on Offshore Minerals Policy, Madang, 22-26 February 1999. 4. David A. Rothery, Geology, Chicago: NTC Publishing Group, 1997. 5. Department of Mineral Resources, “A Green Paper on Offshore Mining Policy”, Port Moresby, April 1999. INTERNATIONAL SEABED AUTHORITY 369

However, the full extent of the offshore reporting requirements will<br />

only be known when the offshore minerals policy is finalised, legislation put<br />

in place, and potential investors granted prospecting and exploration licences.<br />

It is very obvious that the data and information are required for<br />

various purposes including ascertaining availability and extent of the mineral<br />

resource, monitoring compliance, and potential economic exploitation of<br />

offshore minerals in particular polymetallic massive sulphide deposits in the<br />

future should circumstances permit.<br />

As the extent of resources hence reserves is a key requirement if there<br />

is to be a marine mining project involving polymetallic massive sulphides<br />

deposits, in the future both MSR and offshore mineral prospecting and<br />

exploration will be encouraged under the proposed Offshore Mining Policy<br />

for PNG.<br />

SELECTED REFERENCES<br />

1. Allen Clark, “Offshore Mineral Resources Potential of Pacific Nations”, a<br />

paper presented at the regional workshop on Offshore <strong>Minerals</strong> Policy,<br />

Madang, 22-26 February 1999. This paper and others are reproduced in<br />

SOPAC Miscellaneous <strong>Report</strong> 323 under the title Offshore Mineral Policy<br />

Workshop Madang, PNG Workshop <strong>Report</strong>, Suva, April 1999.<br />

2. Bank of Papua New Guinea, Quarterly Economic Bulletin, Port Moresby,<br />

various issues.<br />

3. Charles L. Morgan, “Environmental Impact Assessment for Deep-sea<br />

Mining”, a paper presented at the regional workshop on Offshore<br />

<strong>Minerals</strong> Policy, Madang, 22-26 February 1999.<br />

4. David A. Rothery, Geology, Chicago: NTC Publishing Group, 1997.<br />

5. Department of Mineral Resources, “A Green Paper on Offshore Mining<br />

Policy”, Port Moresby, April 1999.<br />

INTERNATIONAL SEABED AUTHORITY 369

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!