05.02.2013 Views

Minerals Report - International Seabed Authority

Minerals Report - International Seabed Authority

Minerals Report - International Seabed Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7. Why SMS Mines will be Lower Cost<br />

Ask any terrestrial mining company what their greatest issues and<br />

problems are, and the chances are they will give you a long list of factors that<br />

are appear as advantages in the Nautilus vision for SMS mining. Current<br />

market metal prices are determined largely by the efficiency of supply from<br />

the current terrestrial mines. The chart presented below forms represents the<br />

core arguments that we see will lead to SMS mining out competing terrestrial<br />

metals in the production of zinc, copper and gold. These are the fundamental<br />

logical factors that we see transcending the elements of romance and public<br />

interest and that will attract investors to SMS mining for centuries to come.<br />

The advantage of SMS mining relative to terrestrial mining<br />

1. Lower discovery costs – live geochemical signatures, visible deposits<br />

2. Shorter development lead-time – ease of sampling, access<br />

3. No landowner disturbance and compensation costs<br />

4. Exposed deposits – no prestripping or shaft/drive development costs/delays<br />

5. Cheaper beneficiation – superior metallurgy indicated, less grinding<br />

6. No pit-to-port infrastructure – a major capital cost in terrestrial mines<br />

7. Cheaper plant and transport – mobilised from ship year to site<br />

8. FPSO vessel leaseable – not conventional “mine life economics”<br />

9. Metal price responsive – high zinc or high-copper areas targeted<br />

10. One “mine plant” can work many deposits around the world<br />

11. Little waste – costly to produce and a major environmental liability<br />

Cumulative benefit – low capital and operating costs<br />

The oil and gas sector moved offshore in the late 70s and 80s and is a<br />

valuable example of what to expect for the evolutionary course of SMS<br />

mining. In the oil and Gas sector it took less than a decade for offshore<br />

production to move from the sheltered Gulf of Mexico and water depths of<br />

20m to Bass Strait in Australia and the wild conditions of Britain’s North Sea.<br />

In <strong>Minerals</strong>, things tend to move in booms. By April 2000, the fabrication<br />

yards around the Gulf of Mexico had built 5,500 platforms for exploration and<br />

production.<br />

INTERNATIONAL SEABED AUTHORITY 340

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!