Minerals Report - International Seabed Authority
Minerals Report - International Seabed Authority Minerals Report - International Seabed Authority
CHAPTER 8 FACTORS IN FINANCING EXPLORATION FOR SEAFLOOR MASSIVE SULPHIDES DEPOSITS 1. Introduction Julian Malnic, Chief Executive Officer Nautilus Minerals Corporation, Darlinghurst, Australia With exploration for Seafloor Massive Sulphides (SMS)* deposits barely half a decade old, there are not statistically sound generalizations that can be drawn from the financing experience so far. Furthermore, because of the normal confidentiality that surrounds corporate activity, knowledge of industry experience does not extend far beyond our own group. However, it is evident that the capital raising process will be similar to either terrestrial mineral exploration, or maybe even to dot.com style, companies. As the first pioneer into this new field starting in 1994, Nautilus has a unique experience base that I will attempt to share with you in this presentation. I hope that my comments here today are illustrative and inform our workshop about life in this exciting new sector of mining The reason that we are here is to promote a broad understanding of the challenges we are facing and to give people from all sectors a feel for the sort of people we are and the things that motivate us. ____________________________ *The term Seafloor Massive Sulphides (SMS) has been proposed to create a distinguishing label for this new marine variant of a class of deposits normally referred to as Volcanogenic Massive Sulphides. SMS deposits differ markedly in that they are still forming, or have recently stopped forming, and that they will require very different commercial and engineering solutions to VMS in their mining. The term polymetallic is strongly discouraged in labelling or describing SMS deposits (and manganese nodule deposits) because virtually all ores are ‘polymetallic’ before they are processed and thus the word confuses rather than distinguishes. INTERNATIONAL SEABED AUTHORITY 332
So working from the traditional capital-raising model, I will make extensive comments on the distinguishing factors, the factors that are unique to, the capital raising for exploring for seafloor massive sulphides. Before I outline some the spectacular differences in financing SMS exploration, a quick reminder of the traditional structure: 1. Seed Capital – Committed and visionary individuals galvanise the play from a relatively low capital base by forming the company applying for rights and bringing together their key skills and personalities that will create success. 2. Mezzanine Capital – This interim capital uses thoroughly prepared presentational material to solicit capital off-market from individuals or organizations that usually have other investments. Groups incoming at this stage are still quite courageous but they will mostly likely have laid before them an ‘exit strategy’ which limits the time their investment will be exposed to risk before they can sell out – perhaps following a public company Initial Public Offering (IPO). 3. Project Capital – this is the lowest risk stage where the largest sum of capital is sought. Accordingly, a detailed prospectus of some type accompanies the investment proposal usually presenting a wide array of direct public equity participation or public participation through joint venture or consortia partnership companies. 2. Defining the purpose of the investment? The most basic rule of capital raising is that one should be able to say what the money is to be used for in a clear and detailed way. So this can be an early Catch 22. INTERNATIONAL SEABED AUTHORITY 333
- Page 290 and 291: the mussel's nutrition. When experi
- Page 292 and 293: Reasons for this do not appear to b
- Page 294 and 295: egions, one study pointed out that
- Page 296 and 297: very widespread, supporting microbi
- Page 298 and 299: Studies of the rapid colonisation o
- Page 300 and 301: y mining, which is expected to be v
- Page 302 and 303: 2. J. B. Corliss, J. Dymond, L. Gor
- Page 304 and 305: 19. V. Tunnicliffe, A.G. McArthur a
- Page 306 and 307: SUMMARY OF THE PRESENTATION AND DIS
- Page 308 and 309: together with mucus that is secrete
- Page 310 and 311: close to neutral ph conditions, it
- Page 312 and 313: France, Germany, the United Kingdom
- Page 314 and 315: of the sedimentary column, whereas
- Page 316 and 317: Table 2: Research Submersibles and
- Page 318 and 319: 4. Technical Requirements For resea
- Page 320 and 321: 5. Processing Technologies The phys
- Page 322 and 323: grow on substrate rocks because of
- Page 324 and 325: 5. M.D. Hannington, A.G. Galley, P.
- Page 326 and 327: Dr. Herzig informed participants th
- Page 328 and 329: search for sites of hydrothermal ve
- Page 330 and 331: with such a grab. In addition to th
- Page 332 and 333: Remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) D
- Page 334 and 335: equired to make sure that the ship
- Page 336 and 337: Dr. Herzig summarized the technical
- Page 338 and 339: commercial. Since confidentiality o
- Page 342 and 343: The traditional project stages that
- Page 344 and 345: there is a subset that forms in spe
- Page 346 and 347: of competing for the attention of i
- Page 348 and 349: 7. Why SMS Mines will be Lower Cost
- Page 350 and 351: 8. Modelling SMS mining offers scop
- Page 352 and 353: Because exhalative SMS deposits are
- Page 354 and 355: SUMMARY OF THE PRESENTATION AND DIS
- Page 356 and 357: flow to the metal markets. He also
- Page 358 and 359: shortage in the next couple of year
- Page 360 and 361: starts, the operation could take pl
- Page 362 and 363: Based on this and other considerati
- Page 364 and 365: Mr. Malnic said that the mining ope
- Page 366 and 367: and silver. Except for volcanically
- Page 368 and 369: 2.2. Major Features of the Draft Of
- Page 370 and 371: As a general principle the fiscal p
- Page 372 and 373: I think the issue is not as simple
- Page 374 and 375: Table 3: Data and information requi
- Page 376 and 377: former case a reminder notice is se
- Page 378 and 379: 6. Elisabeth Mann Borgese, Ocean Go
- Page 380 and 381: longer an area is held, more inform
- Page 382 and 383: from the deep sea. One group of enz
- Page 384 and 385: CHAPTER 10 NATIONAL AND INTERNATION
- Page 386 and 387: times greater than atmospheric pres
- Page 388 and 389: Fig. 2 Schematic diagram showing th
CHAPTER 8<br />
FACTORS IN FINANCING EXPLORATION FOR SEAFLOOR MASSIVE<br />
SULPHIDES DEPOSITS<br />
1. Introduction<br />
Julian Malnic, Chief Executive Officer<br />
Nautilus <strong>Minerals</strong> Corporation, Darlinghurst, Australia<br />
With exploration for Seafloor Massive Sulphides (SMS)* deposits<br />
barely half a decade old, there are not statistically sound generalizations that<br />
can be drawn from the financing experience so far. Furthermore, because of<br />
the normal confidentiality that surrounds corporate activity, knowledge of<br />
industry experience does not extend far beyond our own group. However, it<br />
is evident that the capital raising process will be similar to either terrestrial<br />
mineral exploration, or maybe even to dot.com style, companies.<br />
As the first pioneer into this new field starting in 1994, Nautilus has a<br />
unique experience base that I will attempt to share with you in this<br />
presentation. I hope that my comments here today are illustrative and inform<br />
our workshop about life in this exciting new sector of mining<br />
The reason that we are here is to promote a broad understanding of<br />
the challenges we are facing and to give people from all sectors a feel for the<br />
sort of people we are and the things that motivate us.<br />
____________________________<br />
*The term Seafloor Massive Sulphides (SMS) has been proposed to create a<br />
distinguishing label for this new marine variant of a class of deposits normally<br />
referred to as Volcanogenic Massive Sulphides. SMS deposits differ markedly in that<br />
they are still forming, or have recently stopped forming, and that they will require<br />
very different commercial and engineering solutions to VMS in their mining. The<br />
term polymetallic is strongly discouraged in labelling or describing SMS deposits<br />
(and manganese nodule deposits) because virtually all ores are ‘polymetallic’ before<br />
they are processed and thus the word confuses rather than distinguishes.<br />
INTERNATIONAL SEABED AUTHORITY 332