04.02.2013 Views

BAIL 2006 Book of Abstracts - Institut für Numerische und ...

BAIL 2006 Book of Abstracts - Institut für Numerische und ...

BAIL 2006 Book of Abstracts - Institut für Numerische und ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

M.H. BUSCHMANN, M. GAD-EL-HAK: Turbulent Bo<strong>und</strong>ary Layers: Reality and<br />

Myth<br />

✬<br />

✫<br />

into the Navier-Stokes equations and taking the limit Re → ∞, leads to Prandtl’s bo<strong>und</strong>ary layer<br />

equations<br />

The bo<strong>und</strong>ary conditions are<br />

uu x + vu y = ! p x + u yy ;<br />

y = 0 :<br />

u = v = 0 and<br />

0 = p y ;<br />

y ! " :<br />

The task is now to find physically appropriate solution for eqn. (3).<br />

ux + v = 0 (3)<br />

y<br />

u ! U e x ( ) (4)<br />

What goals do we have when solving eqn. (3)? One <strong>of</strong> the main objectives is to find self-similar<br />

solutions. Bo<strong>und</strong>ary layers are self-similar when normalization can be fo<strong>und</strong> so that data <strong>of</strong><br />

different physical realizations (e.g., experiments in different wind tunnels, pr<strong>of</strong>iles at different<br />

downstream positions within one experiment) can be collapsed within one single curve.<br />

Examples are the mean velocity pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> the Blasius’ laminar zero-pressure-gradient bo<strong>und</strong>ary<br />

layer and the fully-developed turbulent flow in pipes.<br />

y<br />

u( x, y )<br />

u( x, y )<br />

x 1<br />

3 x<br />

x 2<br />

Which physical problems do we face when solving eqn. (3)? We neither know if for a certain<br />

type <strong>of</strong> wall-bo<strong>und</strong>ed flow a transformation as searched for in the first question exists in general,<br />

nor do we know what the transformation parameters are. The physically appropriate<br />

transformation is a non-dimensionalization that is much more than simply changing the<br />

coordinates. The crucial issue is top choose the scaling based on the physics <strong>of</strong> the problem. At a<br />

minimum, the scale basis has to satisfy two criteria. It should consist <strong>of</strong> characteristic<br />

parameters and represent problem-intrinsic scales. The fo<strong>und</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> dimensional analysis is the<br />

Π-theorem formulated by Buckingham. 2<br />

f ( x 1 ,x 2 ,...xn ) 0<br />

Here xi denote the n variables <strong>of</strong> the system having m dimensions and Δi are the non-dimensional<br />

similarity parameters <strong>of</strong> the problem.<br />

2 Buckingham, E., “On physically similar systems: illustrations <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> dimensional equations,” Phys. Rev., 2.<br />

Ser., vol. 4, pp. 1119–1126, 1914.<br />

u( x, y )<br />

Π-theorem<br />

y<br />

!<br />

Find proper<br />

scaling parameters<br />

Δ and U<br />

= ( 1 2 n m)<br />

u( x, y)<br />

U<br />

F ! , ! ,... ! " = 0<br />

M. H. Buschmann & M. Gad-el-Hak, Abstract for <strong>BAIL</strong> <strong>2006</strong><br />

Speaker: BUSCHMANN, M.H. 33 <strong>BAIL</strong> <strong>2006</strong><br />

✩<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!