BAIL 2006 Book of Abstracts - Institut für Numerische und ...
BAIL 2006 Book of Abstracts - Institut für Numerische und ... BAIL 2006 Book of Abstracts - Institut für Numerische und ...
O. MIERKA, D. KUZMIN: On the implementation of turbulence models in incompressible flow solvers based on a finite element discretization ✬ ✫ On the implementation of turbulence models in incompressible flow solvers based on a finite element discretization 1. Introduction O. Mierka and D. Kuzmin Institute of Applied Mathematics (LS III), University of Dortmund Vogelpothsweg 87, D-44227, Dortmund, Germany omierka@math.uni-dortmund.de kuzmin@math.uni-dortmund.de The numerical implementation of turbulence models involves many algorithmic components all of which may have a decisive influence on the quality of simulation results. In particular, a positivity-preserving discretization of the troublesome convective terms and nonlinear sources/sinks is an important prerequisite for the robustness of the numerical algorithm. This paper presents a detailed numerical study of several eddy viscosity models implemented in the open-source software package FeatFlow (http://www.featflow.de) using algebraic flux correction to enforce the positivity constraint. The underlying finite element discretization and iterative solution techniques are presented and relevant algorithmic details are revealed. 2. Algebraic flux correction schemes The design of high-resolution finite element schemes for numerical simulation of turbulent incompressible flows on the basis of eddy viscosity models is addressed. A robust positivity-preserving algorithm is developed building on the algebraic flux correction paradigm for scalar transport problems [1]. It is explained how to get rid of nonphysical oscillations in the vicinity of steep gradients and to remove excessive artificial diffusion in regions where the solution is sufficiently smooth. To this end, the discrete operators resulting from a standard Galerkin discretization of convective terms are modified so as to enforce the desired matrix properies without violating mass conservation. 3. Implementation of eddy viscosity models The developed algebraic flux correction techniques are applied to high Reynolds number flows that can be described by the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations coupled with an eddy viscosity model of turbulence. A global Multilevel Pressure Schur Complement (discrete projection) method is employed to enforce the incompressibility constraint at the discrete level [2]. The turbulent eddy viscosity is introduced in several different ways using • the RANS approach as represented by various modifications of the k − ε model; • Large Eddy Simulation (LES) with explicit and implicit subgrid scale modelling. In particular, the advantages of Monotonically Integrated LES algorithms as compared to explicit subgrid scale models of Smagorinsky type are explored. The implementation of the standard k−ε model is based on a block-iterative algorithm featuring a positivity-preserving representation of sink terms [2]. The main highlight of the present paper is a unified solution strategy for strongly coupled PDE systems which result from 2D/3D finite element discretizations of RANS and LES models on unstructured meshes. Special emphasis is laid on the near wall treatment and Speaker: MIERKA, O. 118 BAIL 2006 1 ✩ ✪
O. MIERKA, D. KUZMIN: On the implementation of turbulence models in incompressible flow solvers based on a finite element discretization ✬ ✫ implementation of initial/boundary conditions. A set of representative benchmark problems is employed to evaluate the performance of the turbulence models under consideration as applied to incompressible flows at high Reynolds numbers. 4. Numerical examples The first example deals with a 3D simulation of the turbulent incompressible flow past a backward facing step (Re = 44,000) using the standard k −ε model with logarithmic wall functions. The numerical solutions displayed in Figure 1 are in a good agreement with those published in the literature [3]. Figure 1: Backward facing step simulation results (Re = 44,000). Contour lines of a),b) - turbulent kinetic energy; c),d) - turbulent eddy viscosity. a),c) - reference solution [3]. A preliminary code validation for Chien’s low-Reynolds number modification was performed for a simple channel flow at Re = 13,750 and compared with Kim’s [4] DNS data in Figure 2. Numerical experiments using both versions of the k −ε model as well as Large Eddy Simulation with explicit and implicit subgrid scale modelling are currently under way. The results of an in-depth comparative study will be reported at the Conference. Figure 2: Channel flow simulation results (Re = 13,750) compared with reference data [4]. References [1] D. Kuzmin and M. Möller, Algebraic flux correction I. Scalar conservation laws. In: D. Kuzmin, R. Löhner and S. Turek (eds.) Flux-Corrected Transport: Principles, Algorithms, and Applications. Springer, 2005, 155-206. [2] S. Turek and D. Kuzmin, Algebraic flux correction III. Incompressible flow problems. In: D. Kuzmin, R. Löhner and S. Turek (eds.) Flux-Corrected Transport: Principles, Algorithms, and Applications. Springer, 2005, 251-296. [3] F. Ilinca, J.-F. Hétu and D. Pelletier, A Unified Finite Element Algorithm for Two-Equation Models of Turbulence. Comp. & Fluids 27-3 (1998) 291–310. [4] J. Kim, P. Moin and R. D. Moser, Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 177 (1987) 133–166. 2 Speaker: MIERKA, O. 119 BAIL 2006 ✩ ✪
- Page 90 and 91: F. ALIZARD, J.-CH. ROBINET: Two-dim
- Page 92 and 93: TH. ALRUTZ, T. KNOPP: Near-wall gri
- Page 94 and 95: M. BAUSE: Aspects of SUPG/PSPG and
- Page 96 and 97: L. BOGUSLAWSKI: Sheare Stress Distr
- Page 98 and 99: A.CANGIANI, E.H.GEORGOULIS, M. JENS
- Page 100 and 101: C. CLAVERO, J.L. GRACIA, F. LISBONA
- Page 102 and 103: B. EISFELD: Computation of complex
- Page 104 and 105: A. FIROOZ, M. GADAMI: Turbulence Fl
- Page 106 and 107: A. FIROOZ, M. GADAMI: Turbulence Fl
- Page 108 and 109: S.A. GAPONOV, G.V. PETROV, B.V. SMO
- Page 110 and 111: M. HAMOUDA, R. TEMAM: Boundary laye
- Page 112 and 113: M. HAMOUDA, R. TEMAM: Boundary laye
- Page 114 and 115: M. HÖLLING, H. HERWIG: Computation
- Page 116 and 117: A.-M. IL’IN, B.I. SULEIMANOV: The
- Page 118 and 119: W.S. ISLAM, V.R. RAGHAVAN: Numerica
- Page 120 and 121: D. KACHUMA, I. SOBEY: Fast waves du
- Page 122 and 123: A. KAUSHIK, K.K. SHARMA: A Robust N
- Page 124 and 125: P. KNOBLOCH: On methods diminishing
- Page 126 and 127: T. KNOPP: Model-consistent universa
- Page 128 and 129: J.-S. LEU, J.-Y. JANG, Y.-C. CHOU:
- Page 130 and 131: V.D. LISEYKIN, Y.V. LIKHANOVA, D.V.
- Page 132 and 133: G. LUBE: A stabilized finite elemen
- Page 134 and 135: H. LÜDEKE: Detached Eddy Simulatio
- Page 136 and 137: K. MANSOUR: Boundary Layer Solution
- Page 138 and 139: J. MAUSS, J. COUSTEIX: Global Inter
- Page 142 and 143: K. MORINISHI: Rarefied Gas Boundary
- Page 144 and 145: A. NASTASE: Qualitative Analysis of
- Page 146 and 147: F. NATAF, G. RAPIN: Application of
- Page 148 and 149: N. NEUSS: Numerical approximation o
- Page 150 and 151: M.A. OLSHANSKII: An Augmented Lagra
- Page 152 and 153: N. PARUMASUR, J. BANASIAK, J.M. KOZ
- Page 154 and 155: B. RASUO: On Boundary Layer Control
- Page 156 and 157: H.-G. ROOS: A Comparison of Stabili
- Page 158 and 159: B. SCHEICHL, A. KLUWICK: On Turbule
- Page 160 and 161: O. SHISHKINA, C. WAGNER: Boundary a
- Page 162 and 163: M. STYNES, L. TOBISKA: Using rectan
- Page 164 and 165: P. SVÁ ˘CEK: Numerical Approximat
- Page 166 and 167: N.V. TARASOVA: Full asymptotic anal
- Page 168 and 169: C.H. TAI, C.-Y. CHAO, J.-C. LEONG,
- Page 170 and 171: H. TIAN: Uniformly Convergent Numer
- Page 172 and 173: ABOUTUNSTEADYBOUNDARYLAYERONADIHEDR
- Page 174 and 175: A.E.P. VELDMANN: High-order symmetr
- Page 176 and 177: Z.-H. YANG, Y.-Z. LI, Y. ZHU: Appli
- Page 178 and 179: Q. YE: Numerical simulation of turb
- Page 181: Participants
- Page 184 and 185: Mrs.Maragatha Meenakshi Ponnusamy P
- Page 186 and 187: Authors Alizard, F., 67 Alrutz, Th,
O. MIERKA, D. KUZMIN: On the implementation <strong>of</strong> turbulence models in incompressible<br />
flow solvers based on a finite element discretization<br />
✬<br />
✫<br />
On the implementation <strong>of</strong> turbulence models in incompressible<br />
flow solvers based on a finite element discretization<br />
1. Introduction<br />
O. Mierka and D. Kuzmin<br />
<strong>Institut</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Applied Mathematics (LS III), University <strong>of</strong> Dortm<strong>und</strong><br />
Vogelpothsweg 87, D-44227, Dortm<strong>und</strong>, Germany<br />
omierka@math.uni-dortm<strong>und</strong>.de<br />
kuzmin@math.uni-dortm<strong>und</strong>.de<br />
The numerical implementation <strong>of</strong> turbulence models involves many algorithmic components<br />
all <strong>of</strong> which may have a decisive influence on the quality <strong>of</strong> simulation results. In particular,<br />
a positivity-preserving discretization <strong>of</strong> the troublesome convective terms and nonlinear<br />
sources/sinks is an important prerequisite for the robustness <strong>of</strong> the numerical algorithm. This<br />
paper presents a detailed numerical study <strong>of</strong> several eddy viscosity models implemented in the<br />
open-source s<strong>of</strong>tware package FeatFlow (http://www.featflow.de) using algebraic flux correction<br />
to enforce the positivity constraint. The <strong>und</strong>erlying finite element discretization and<br />
iterative solution techniques are presented and relevant algorithmic details are revealed.<br />
2. Algebraic flux correction schemes<br />
The design <strong>of</strong> high-resolution finite element schemes for numerical simulation <strong>of</strong> turbulent incompressible<br />
flows on the basis <strong>of</strong> eddy viscosity models is addressed. A robust positivity-preserving<br />
algorithm is developed building on the algebraic flux correction paradigm for scalar transport<br />
problems [1]. It is explained how to get rid <strong>of</strong> nonphysical oscillations in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> steep<br />
gradients and to remove excessive artificial diffusion in regions where the solution is sufficiently<br />
smooth. To this end, the discrete operators resulting from a standard Galerkin discretization<br />
<strong>of</strong> convective terms are modified so as to enforce the desired matrix properies without violating<br />
mass conservation.<br />
3. Implementation <strong>of</strong> eddy viscosity models<br />
The developed algebraic flux correction techniques are applied to high Reynolds number flows<br />
that can be described by the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations coupled with an eddy<br />
viscosity model <strong>of</strong> turbulence. A global Multilevel Pressure Schur Complement (discrete projection)<br />
method is employed to enforce the incompressibility constraint at the discrete level [2].<br />
The turbulent eddy viscosity is introduced in several different ways using<br />
• the RANS approach as represented by various modifications <strong>of</strong> the k − ε model;<br />
• Large Eddy Simulation (LES) with explicit and implicit subgrid scale modelling.<br />
In particular, the advantages <strong>of</strong> Monotonically Integrated LES algorithms as compared to explicit<br />
subgrid scale models <strong>of</strong> Smagorinsky type are explored. The implementation <strong>of</strong> the standard k−ε<br />
model is based on a block-iterative algorithm featuring a positivity-preserving representation <strong>of</strong><br />
sink terms [2]. The main highlight <strong>of</strong> the present paper is a unified solution strategy for strongly<br />
coupled PDE systems which result from 2D/3D finite element discretizations <strong>of</strong> RANS and<br />
LES models on unstructured meshes. Special emphasis is laid on the near wall treatment and<br />
Speaker: MIERKA, O. 118 <strong>BAIL</strong> <strong>2006</strong><br />
1<br />
✩<br />
✪