BAIL 2006 Book of Abstracts - Institut für Numerische und ...
BAIL 2006 Book of Abstracts - Institut für Numerische und ... BAIL 2006 Book of Abstracts - Institut für Numerische und ...
K. MANSOUR: Boundary Layer Solution For laminar flow through a Loosely curved Pipe by Using Stokes Expansion ✬ ✫ this paper we have shown that what proposed by [20] as the cause of the discrepancy lies in the use of the only first 12 terms for corresponding curved problem is not correct. In this work we increase number of terms from 12 in [1] to 20 and still the major conclusion of the discrepancy between the solution obtained using the extended stoke series method and that obtained using other method persist as it was the case for the rotating pipe[26]. REFERENCES [1] Van Dyke, M. 1978 Extended stokes series: laminar flow through a loosely coiled pipe. J.Fluid Mech.,86, 129-145 [2] Adler,M.”Flow in curved tubes” Z.Angew.Math.1934 Mech.,14,257 [3]Barua,S.N. 1963 On secondary flow in stationary curved pipes. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Maths. 26. 61-77 [4] Mori, Y. & Nakayama, W. 1965 study on forced convective heat transfer in curved pipes (1 st report, laminar region). Intl. J. of Heat Mass Transfer 8, 67-82 [5] Ito, H., 1969 Laminar Flow in curved pipes Z. agnew. Math. Mech. 11. 653-663 [6] Smith, F. T. 1976 Steady motion within a curved pipe. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 347, 345-370 [7] White, C. M. 1929 Streamline flow through curved pipes. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 123, 845-663. [8] Hasson,D. 1955 “Streamline flow resistence in coils. Research 8(1) supplement p.S1 [9] Trefethen, L. 1957b Flow in rotating radial ducts: report R55GL 350 on laminar flow in rotating, heated horizontal, and bent tubes, extended into transition and turbulent regions. Gen. Elec. Co. Rep. 55GL350-A. [10] Ito, H.,1959 Friction factors for turbulent flow in curved pipes.Trans.ASMEJ.BasicEngng.81,123-134 [11] Collins, W. M. &Dennis, S. C. R. 1975 The steady motion of a viscous fluid in a curved tube. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Maths. 28, 133-156. [12] Dennis, S.C.R. 1980 “Calculation of the steady flow through a curved tube using a new finite difference method. J.Fluid. Mech.,99, 449-467 [13] Dennis, S.C.R. &Ng,M.C. 1982 “Dual solution for steady laminar flow through a curved tube.Q.J. Mech. Appl. Maths 35,305-324 [14] Nandakumar, K. & Masliyah, J. H. 1982 Bifurcation in steady laminar flow through curved tubes.J. Fluid Mech. 119,475-490 [15] Mansour, K. 1985 Laminar flow through a slowly rotating straight pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 150, 1-24. [16] Soh,W.Y.&Berger,S.A. 1987 “fully developed flow in a curved pipe of arbitrary curvature ratio.Intl J. Numer.Mech. Fluids 7,733 [17] Winters,K.H. 1987 A bifurcation study of laminar flow in a curved tube of rectangular cross-section. J. Fluid Mech. 180, 343-369 [18] Ramshankar, R. & Sreenvasan, K. R. 1988 A paradox concerning the extended Stokes series solution for the pressure drop in coiled pipes. Phys. Fluids, 1339-1347. [19] Van Dyke, M. 1989 some paradoxes in viscous flow theory. “Some unanswered question in fluid mechanics “ (ed. L. M. Trefethan & R. L. Panton).Appl. Mech. Rev. 43, 153-170 [20] S. Jayanti & G.F. Hewitt. "On the paradox concerning friction factor ratio in laminar flow in coils", Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A (1991) 432, 291-299 [21] Mansour, K. 1993 Using Stokes Expansion For Natural Convection inside a two-dimensional cavity. Fluid Dynamics Research, 1-33 [22 ] Dennis,S.C.R. and Riley,N. 1993 ”On the fully developed flow in a curved pipe at large Dean number” Proc. Roy. Soc. A.434, 473-478 [23] Ishigaki, H. "Analogy between laminar flows in curved pipes and orthogonal rotating pipes". J. Fluid Mech. (1994), vol.268, pp. 133-145 [24] Dean, W.R. 1927 Note on the motion of fluid in a curved pipe. Phil.Mag. (7) 4,208-223 [25] Taylor, G.I. 1929 The criterion for turbulence in curved piped. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 124, 243-249. [26] Mansour, K. 2002 Boundary layer solution using Stokes expansion for Laminar flow through a slow- rotating pipe, Proceedings of BAIL 2002 ,An international conference on boundary and interior layers computational & Asymptotic methods, Perth, Western Australia. Speaker: MANSOUR, K. 114 BAIL 2006 ✩ ✪
G. MATTHIES, L. TOBISKA: Mass conservation of finite element methods for coupled flow-transport problems ✬ ✫ Mass conservation of finite element methods for coupled flow-transport problems Gunar Matthies 1 and Lutz Tobiska 2 1 Fakultät für Mathematik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum 2 Institut für Analysis und Numerik, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg We consider a coupled flow-transport problem in a bounded domain Ω ⊂ R d , d = 2,3. The system is described by the instationary, incompressible Navier–Stokes equations and the time-dependent transport equation ut − ν△u + (u · ∇)u + ∇p = f in Ω × (0,T], div u = 0 in Ω × (0,T], u = ub on ∂Ω × (0,T], u(0) = u 0 in Ω, ct − ε△c + u · ∇c = g in Ω × (0,T], (cu − ε∇c) · n = cI u · n on Γ− × (0,T], ε∇c · n = 0 on Γ+ × (0,T], c(0) = c 0 in Ω. Here, u and p denote the velocity and the pressure of the fluid, respectively, ν and ε are small positive numbers, c is the concentration, cI the concentration at the inflow boundary Γ− := {x ∈ ∂Ω : u · n < 0}, and Γ+ := ∂Ω \ Γ−. We assume that ub is the restriction of a divergence free function onto the boundary ∂Ω. Note that the velocity u from the Navier–Stokes equations enters the transport equation as a convection field. Due to incompressibility constraint, the weak solution c of (2) satisfies the global mass conservation property � � � � d cdx + cIu · ndγ + cu · ndγ = g dx. (3) dt Ω Γ− Γ+ Ω It is well-known [1], that the finite element solutions satisfy in general the incompressibility constraint and the global mass conservation property (3) only approximately. Different discretisation methods [2, 3, 4] for the instationary, incompressible Navier–Stokes equations and stabilised schemes for the transport problem like SDFEM will be studied numerically. References [1] C. Dawson, S. Sun, M. F. Wheeler, Compatible algorithms for coupled flow and transport. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 193, 2565–2580 (2004). [2] G. Matthies, L. Tobiska, The inf-sup condition for the mapped Qk/P disc k−1 element in arbitrary space dimensions. Computing, 69, 119–139 (2002). [3] G. Matthies, L. Tobiska, Inf-sup stable non-conforming finite elements of arbitrary order on triangles. Numer. Math., 102, 293–309 (2005). [4] G. Matthies, Inf-sup stable nonconforming finite elements of higher order on quadrilaterals and hexahedra. Bericht Nr. 373, Fakultät für Mathematik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum (2005). Speaker: MATTHIES, G. 115 BAIL 2006 1 (1) (2) ✩ ✪
- Page 85 and 86: P. ZEGELING: An Adaptive Grid Metho
- Page 87: Contributed Presentations
- Page 90 and 91: F. ALIZARD, J.-CH. ROBINET: Two-dim
- Page 92 and 93: TH. ALRUTZ, T. KNOPP: Near-wall gri
- Page 94 and 95: M. BAUSE: Aspects of SUPG/PSPG and
- Page 96 and 97: L. BOGUSLAWSKI: Sheare Stress Distr
- Page 98 and 99: A.CANGIANI, E.H.GEORGOULIS, M. JENS
- Page 100 and 101: C. CLAVERO, J.L. GRACIA, F. LISBONA
- Page 102 and 103: B. EISFELD: Computation of complex
- Page 104 and 105: A. FIROOZ, M. GADAMI: Turbulence Fl
- Page 106 and 107: A. FIROOZ, M. GADAMI: Turbulence Fl
- Page 108 and 109: S.A. GAPONOV, G.V. PETROV, B.V. SMO
- Page 110 and 111: M. HAMOUDA, R. TEMAM: Boundary laye
- Page 112 and 113: M. HAMOUDA, R. TEMAM: Boundary laye
- Page 114 and 115: M. HÖLLING, H. HERWIG: Computation
- Page 116 and 117: A.-M. IL’IN, B.I. SULEIMANOV: The
- Page 118 and 119: W.S. ISLAM, V.R. RAGHAVAN: Numerica
- Page 120 and 121: D. KACHUMA, I. SOBEY: Fast waves du
- Page 122 and 123: A. KAUSHIK, K.K. SHARMA: A Robust N
- Page 124 and 125: P. KNOBLOCH: On methods diminishing
- Page 126 and 127: T. KNOPP: Model-consistent universa
- Page 128 and 129: J.-S. LEU, J.-Y. JANG, Y.-C. CHOU:
- Page 130 and 131: V.D. LISEYKIN, Y.V. LIKHANOVA, D.V.
- Page 132 and 133: G. LUBE: A stabilized finite elemen
- Page 134 and 135: H. LÜDEKE: Detached Eddy Simulatio
- Page 138 and 139: J. MAUSS, J. COUSTEIX: Global Inter
- Page 140 and 141: O. MIERKA, D. KUZMIN: On the implem
- Page 142 and 143: K. MORINISHI: Rarefied Gas Boundary
- Page 144 and 145: A. NASTASE: Qualitative Analysis of
- Page 146 and 147: F. NATAF, G. RAPIN: Application of
- Page 148 and 149: N. NEUSS: Numerical approximation o
- Page 150 and 151: M.A. OLSHANSKII: An Augmented Lagra
- Page 152 and 153: N. PARUMASUR, J. BANASIAK, J.M. KOZ
- Page 154 and 155: B. RASUO: On Boundary Layer Control
- Page 156 and 157: H.-G. ROOS: A Comparison of Stabili
- Page 158 and 159: B. SCHEICHL, A. KLUWICK: On Turbule
- Page 160 and 161: O. SHISHKINA, C. WAGNER: Boundary a
- Page 162 and 163: M. STYNES, L. TOBISKA: Using rectan
- Page 164 and 165: P. SVÁ ˘CEK: Numerical Approximat
- Page 166 and 167: N.V. TARASOVA: Full asymptotic anal
- Page 168 and 169: C.H. TAI, C.-Y. CHAO, J.-C. LEONG,
- Page 170 and 171: H. TIAN: Uniformly Convergent Numer
- Page 172 and 173: ABOUTUNSTEADYBOUNDARYLAYERONADIHEDR
- Page 174 and 175: A.E.P. VELDMANN: High-order symmetr
- Page 176 and 177: Z.-H. YANG, Y.-Z. LI, Y. ZHU: Appli
- Page 178 and 179: Q. YE: Numerical simulation of turb
- Page 181: Participants
- Page 184 and 185: Mrs.Maragatha Meenakshi Ponnusamy P
K. MANSOUR: Bo<strong>und</strong>ary Layer Solution For laminar flow through a Loosely curved<br />
Pipe by Using Stokes Expansion<br />
✬<br />
✫<br />
this paper we have shown that what proposed by [20] as the cause <strong>of</strong> the discrepancy lies in the<br />
use <strong>of</strong> the only first 12 terms for corresponding curved problem is not correct. In this work we<br />
increase number <strong>of</strong> terms from 12 in [1] to 20 and still the major conclusion <strong>of</strong> the discrepancy<br />
between the solution obtained using the extended stoke series method and that obtained using<br />
other method persist as it was the case for the rotating pipe[26].<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] Van Dyke, M. 1978 Extended stokes series: laminar flow through a loosely coiled pipe. J.Fluid<br />
Mech.,86, 129-145<br />
[2] Adler,M.”Flow in curved tubes” Z.Angew.Math.1934 Mech.,14,257<br />
[3]Barua,S.N. 1963 On secondary flow in stationary curved pipes. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Maths. 26. 61-77<br />
[4] Mori, Y. & Nakayama, W. 1965 study on forced convective heat transfer in curved pipes (1 st report,<br />
laminar region). Intl. J. <strong>of</strong> Heat Mass Transfer 8, 67-82<br />
[5] Ito, H., 1969 Laminar Flow in curved pipes Z. agnew. Math. Mech. 11. 653-663<br />
[6] Smith, F. T. 1976 Steady motion within a curved pipe. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 347, 345-370<br />
[7] White, C. M. 1929 Streamline flow through curved pipes. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 123, 845-663.<br />
[8] Hasson,D. 1955 “Streamline flow resistence in coils. Research 8(1) supplement p.S1<br />
[9] Trefethen, L. 1957b Flow in rotating radial ducts: report R55GL 350 on laminar flow in rotating,<br />
heated horizontal, and bent tubes, extended into transition and turbulent regions. Gen. Elec. Co.<br />
Rep. 55GL350-A.<br />
[10] Ito, H.,1959 Friction factors for turbulent flow in curved pipes.Trans.ASMEJ.BasicEngng.81,123-134<br />
[11] Collins, W. M. &Dennis, S. C. R. 1975 The steady motion <strong>of</strong> a viscous fluid in a curved tube.<br />
Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Maths. 28, 133-156.<br />
[12] Dennis, S.C.R. 1980 “Calculation <strong>of</strong> the steady flow through a curved tube using a new finite<br />
difference method. J.Fluid. Mech.,99, 449-467<br />
[13] Dennis, S.C.R. &Ng,M.C. 1982 “Dual solution for steady laminar flow through a curved tube.Q.J.<br />
Mech. Appl. Maths 35,305-324<br />
[14] Nandakumar, K. & Masliyah, J. H. 1982 Bifurcation in steady laminar flow through curved tubes.J.<br />
Fluid Mech. 119,475-490<br />
[15] Mansour, K. 1985 Laminar flow through a slowly rotating straight pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 150, 1-24.<br />
[16] Soh,W.Y.&Berger,S.A. 1987 “fully developed flow in a curved pipe <strong>of</strong> arbitrary<br />
curvature ratio.Intl J. Numer.Mech. Fluids 7,733<br />
[17] Winters,K.H. 1987 A bifurcation study <strong>of</strong> laminar flow in a curved<br />
tube <strong>of</strong> rectangular cross-section. J. Fluid Mech. 180, 343-369<br />
[18] Ramshankar, R. & Sreenvasan, K. R. 1988 A paradox concerning the extended Stokes series solution<br />
for the pressure drop in coiled pipes. Phys. Fluids, 1339-1347.<br />
[19] Van Dyke, M. 1989 some paradoxes in viscous flow theory. “Some unanswered question in fluid<br />
mechanics “ (ed. L. M. Trefethan & R. L. Panton).Appl. Mech. Rev. 43, 153-170<br />
[20] S. Jayanti & G.F. Hewitt. "On the paradox concerning friction factor ratio in laminar flow in coils",<br />
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A (1991) 432, 291-299<br />
[21] Mansour, K. 1993 Using Stokes Expansion For Natural Convection inside a two-dimensional cavity.<br />
Fluid Dynamics Research, 1-33<br />
[22 ] Dennis,S.C.R. and Riley,N. 1993 ”On the fully developed flow in a curved pipe<br />
at large Dean number” Proc. Roy. Soc. A.434, 473-478<br />
[23] Ishigaki, H. "Analogy between laminar flows in curved pipes and orthogonal rotating pipes". J. Fluid<br />
Mech. (1994), vol.268, pp. 133-145<br />
[24] Dean, W.R. 1927 Note on the motion <strong>of</strong> fluid in a curved pipe. Phil.Mag. (7) 4,208-223<br />
[25] Taylor, G.I. 1929 The criterion for turbulence in curved piped. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 124, 243-249.<br />
[26] Mansour, K. 2002 Bo<strong>und</strong>ary layer solution using Stokes expansion for Laminar flow through a slow-<br />
rotating pipe, Proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>BAIL</strong> 2002 ,An international conference on bo<strong>und</strong>ary and interior layers<br />
computational & Asymptotic methods, Perth, Western Australia.<br />
Speaker: MANSOUR, K. 114 <strong>BAIL</strong> <strong>2006</strong><br />
✩<br />
✪