BAIL 2006 Book of Abstracts - Institut für Numerische und ...
BAIL 2006 Book of Abstracts - Institut für Numerische und ... BAIL 2006 Book of Abstracts - Institut für Numerische und ...
H. LÜDEKE: Detached Eddy Simulation of Supersonic Shear Layer Wake Flows ✬ ✫ References [1] J.L. Herrin, J.C. Dutton: Supersonic Base flow Experiments in the Near Wake of aa Cylindrical Afterbody. AIAA Journal, Vol 32, No. 1, January 1994. [2] A. Mack, V. Hannemann: Validation of the unstructured DLR-TAU-Code for Hypersonic Flows, AIAA 2002-3111, 2002. [3] J.R. Forsythe, K.A. Hoffmann, K.D. Squires: Detached-Eddy Simulation with compressibility Corrections Applied to a Supersonic Axisymmetric Base Flow. AIAA 02-0586, 2002. [4] Alessandro La Neve, Flávio de Azevedo Corrêa Junior: SARA Experiment Module Project: Using Skills to Enlarge Experiences. International conference on Engineering Education, Manchester, U.K., August 18-21, 2002 Expansion Waves Separation Bubble Reattachment Shock cp: -0.18 -0.14 -0.10 -0.07 -0.03 0.01 0.05 Figure 1: Flow topology and Cp contours of the axisymmetric cylinder wake at M∞ =2.4, Re =1.4 · 10 6 . vorticity: 1600 2106 2773 3650 4804 6325 8326 10960 14427 18991 25000 Figure 2: Instantanious vorticity contours in the SARA wake at M∞ =5.1, Re =20· 10 6 . Speaker: LÜDEKE, H. 112 BAIL 2006 2 ✩ ✪
K. MANSOUR: Boundary Layer Solution For laminar flow through a Loosely curved Pipe by Using Stokes Expansion ✬ ✫ Boundary Layer Solution For laminar flow through a Loosely curved Pipe by Using Stokes Expansion By Kamyar Mansour Department of Aerospace Engineering and New Technologies Research Center Amir Kabir University of Technology Tehran, Iran, 15875-4413 mansour@aut.ac.ir And Flow Research and Engineering P.O. Box # 20543 Palo Alto, CA, 94309 Keywords: Curved pipe, high Dean Number We consider fully developed steady laminar flow through a toroidal pipe of small curvature ratios .The solution is expanded up to 40 terms by computer in powers of Dean Number. The major conclusion of this investigation is that the friction ratio in a loosely coiled pipe grows asymptotically as the 1/4 power of the similarity parameter and not as the 1/2 power as previously deduced from boundary-layer analysis. This work confirmed the results obtained by [1]. The goal of this analysis is to provide as complete a description as possible of the flow. The analysis yields a solution for all values of Reynolds number from zero to infinity in a continuous fashion The paradox concerns the discrepancy between the solution obtained using the extended Stokes series method [1] and that obtained using boundary layer techniques [2],[3],[4],[5],[6]and experimental work of [7],[8],[9],[10]and numerical work of [11]for the ratio of the friction factors in coiled tubes to that in straight one in steady, fully developed laminar flow. . In the ensuing debates several papers of[12],[13].[14],[15],[16].[17],[18].[19],[20],[21],[22],[23] various explanations and new evidence have been given; however, the paradox , the resolution of which is important still remain as a open problem The author in [20] raise the possibility of cause of this paradox is the use of only 24 terms to estimate the asymptotic limit obtained by [1]. In this paper we extend the Stokes series from 24 terms used by [1] to 40 terms. We confirm the major result of the friction ratio in a loosely coiled pipe grows asymptotically as the 1/4 power of the similarity parameter and not as the 1/2 power and that confirm the result of [1]. What is particularly important in problems of this type is the presence of analyticity. Not every stokes expansion, for examples that of the flow past sphere as described by the full Navier-Stokes equation are analytic in Reynolds number. In this case, method of matched asymptotic expansions is required and can be automated An alternative explanation of the departure of the experiments from our curve might be that for more tightly coiled pipes the steady laminar flow is succeeded not by turbulent flow, but by an intermediate regime of unsteady laminar motion, with higher friction. Taylor [25] expressed the possibility that there may exist an intermediate flow regime between the laminar and turbulent ranges. He observed a transition from a steady laminar flow to a laminar vibrating flow as the speed increased. The onset of turbulence accrued only at a significantly higher speed. The effect of diameter ratios a/L on the relation between the friction factor and the Dean number has been investigated numerically by [16] and is found to be negligibly small. They concluded the friction factor ratio is relatively insensitive to the diameter ratios at a given Dean number. However in 1988 [18] for corresponding curved pipe problem tried to make experiment to match the series extension, would have to satisfy that is the flow be fully developed at high Dean number namely bigger than 500 and laminar as well as a/L less than .03. But his result adds another mystery to this paradox and they obtained data, which lay closer to the present method. In Speaker: MANSOUR, K. 113 BAIL 2006 ✩ ✪
- Page 83 and 84: A.I. ZADORIN: Numerical Method for
- Page 85 and 86: P. ZEGELING: An Adaptive Grid Metho
- Page 87: Contributed Presentations
- Page 90 and 91: F. ALIZARD, J.-CH. ROBINET: Two-dim
- Page 92 and 93: TH. ALRUTZ, T. KNOPP: Near-wall gri
- Page 94 and 95: M. BAUSE: Aspects of SUPG/PSPG and
- Page 96 and 97: L. BOGUSLAWSKI: Sheare Stress Distr
- Page 98 and 99: A.CANGIANI, E.H.GEORGOULIS, M. JENS
- Page 100 and 101: C. CLAVERO, J.L. GRACIA, F. LISBONA
- Page 102 and 103: B. EISFELD: Computation of complex
- Page 104 and 105: A. FIROOZ, M. GADAMI: Turbulence Fl
- Page 106 and 107: A. FIROOZ, M. GADAMI: Turbulence Fl
- Page 108 and 109: S.A. GAPONOV, G.V. PETROV, B.V. SMO
- Page 110 and 111: M. HAMOUDA, R. TEMAM: Boundary laye
- Page 112 and 113: M. HAMOUDA, R. TEMAM: Boundary laye
- Page 114 and 115: M. HÖLLING, H. HERWIG: Computation
- Page 116 and 117: A.-M. IL’IN, B.I. SULEIMANOV: The
- Page 118 and 119: W.S. ISLAM, V.R. RAGHAVAN: Numerica
- Page 120 and 121: D. KACHUMA, I. SOBEY: Fast waves du
- Page 122 and 123: A. KAUSHIK, K.K. SHARMA: A Robust N
- Page 124 and 125: P. KNOBLOCH: On methods diminishing
- Page 126 and 127: T. KNOPP: Model-consistent universa
- Page 128 and 129: J.-S. LEU, J.-Y. JANG, Y.-C. CHOU:
- Page 130 and 131: V.D. LISEYKIN, Y.V. LIKHANOVA, D.V.
- Page 132 and 133: G. LUBE: A stabilized finite elemen
- Page 136 and 137: K. MANSOUR: Boundary Layer Solution
- Page 138 and 139: J. MAUSS, J. COUSTEIX: Global Inter
- Page 140 and 141: O. MIERKA, D. KUZMIN: On the implem
- Page 142 and 143: K. MORINISHI: Rarefied Gas Boundary
- Page 144 and 145: A. NASTASE: Qualitative Analysis of
- Page 146 and 147: F. NATAF, G. RAPIN: Application of
- Page 148 and 149: N. NEUSS: Numerical approximation o
- Page 150 and 151: M.A. OLSHANSKII: An Augmented Lagra
- Page 152 and 153: N. PARUMASUR, J. BANASIAK, J.M. KOZ
- Page 154 and 155: B. RASUO: On Boundary Layer Control
- Page 156 and 157: H.-G. ROOS: A Comparison of Stabili
- Page 158 and 159: B. SCHEICHL, A. KLUWICK: On Turbule
- Page 160 and 161: O. SHISHKINA, C. WAGNER: Boundary a
- Page 162 and 163: M. STYNES, L. TOBISKA: Using rectan
- Page 164 and 165: P. SVÁ ˘CEK: Numerical Approximat
- Page 166 and 167: N.V. TARASOVA: Full asymptotic anal
- Page 168 and 169: C.H. TAI, C.-Y. CHAO, J.-C. LEONG,
- Page 170 and 171: H. TIAN: Uniformly Convergent Numer
- Page 172 and 173: ABOUTUNSTEADYBOUNDARYLAYERONADIHEDR
- Page 174 and 175: A.E.P. VELDMANN: High-order symmetr
- Page 176 and 177: Z.-H. YANG, Y.-Z. LI, Y. ZHU: Appli
- Page 178 and 179: Q. YE: Numerical simulation of turb
- Page 181: Participants
K. MANSOUR: Bo<strong>und</strong>ary Layer Solution For laminar flow through a Loosely curved<br />
Pipe by Using Stokes Expansion<br />
✬<br />
✫<br />
Bo<strong>und</strong>ary Layer Solution For laminar flow through a<br />
Loosely curved Pipe by Using Stokes Expansion<br />
By Kamyar Mansour<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Aerospace Engineering and New Technologies Research Center<br />
Amir Kabir University <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />
Tehran, Iran, 15875-4413<br />
mansour@aut.ac.ir<br />
And<br />
Flow Research and Engineering<br />
P.O. Box # 20543 Palo Alto, CA, 94309<br />
Keywords: Curved pipe, high Dean Number<br />
We consider fully developed steady laminar flow through a toroidal pipe <strong>of</strong> small curvature ratios<br />
.The solution is expanded up to 40 terms by computer in powers <strong>of</strong> Dean Number. The major<br />
conclusion <strong>of</strong> this investigation is that the friction ratio in a loosely coiled pipe grows<br />
asymptotically as the 1/4 power <strong>of</strong> the similarity parameter and not as the 1/2 power as previously<br />
deduced from bo<strong>und</strong>ary-layer analysis. This work confirmed the results obtained by [1]. The goal<br />
<strong>of</strong> this analysis is to provide as complete a description as possible <strong>of</strong> the flow. The analysis<br />
yields a solution for all values <strong>of</strong> Reynolds number from zero to infinity in a continuous fashion<br />
The paradox concerns the discrepancy between the solution obtained using the extended Stokes<br />
series method [1] and that obtained using bo<strong>und</strong>ary layer techniques [2],[3],[4],[5],[6]and<br />
experimental work <strong>of</strong> [7],[8],[9],[10]and numerical work <strong>of</strong> [11]for the ratio <strong>of</strong> the friction factors<br />
in coiled tubes to that in straight one in steady, fully developed laminar flow. . In the ensuing<br />
debates several papers <strong>of</strong>[12],[13].[14],[15],[16].[17],[18].[19],[20],[21],[22],[23] various<br />
explanations and new evidence have been given; however, the paradox , the resolution <strong>of</strong> which<br />
is important still remain as a open problem<br />
The author in [20] raise the possibility <strong>of</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> this paradox is the use <strong>of</strong> only 24 terms to<br />
estimate the asymptotic limit obtained by [1]. In this paper we extend the Stokes series from 24<br />
terms used by [1] to 40 terms. We confirm the major result <strong>of</strong> the friction ratio in a loosely coiled<br />
pipe grows asymptotically as the 1/4 power <strong>of</strong> the similarity parameter and not as the 1/2 power<br />
and that confirm the result <strong>of</strong> [1].<br />
What is particularly important in problems <strong>of</strong> this type is the presence <strong>of</strong> analyticity. Not every<br />
stokes expansion, for examples that <strong>of</strong> the flow past sphere as described by the full Navier-Stokes<br />
equation are analytic in Reynolds number. In this case, method <strong>of</strong> matched asymptotic expansions<br />
is required and can be automated<br />
An alternative explanation <strong>of</strong> the departure <strong>of</strong> the experiments from our curve might be that for<br />
more tightly coiled pipes the steady laminar flow is succeeded not by turbulent flow, but by an<br />
intermediate regime <strong>of</strong> unsteady laminar motion, with higher friction. Taylor [25] expressed the<br />
possibility that there may exist an intermediate flow regime between the laminar and turbulent<br />
ranges. He observed a transition from a steady laminar flow to a laminar vibrating flow as the<br />
speed increased. The onset <strong>of</strong> turbulence accrued only at a significantly higher speed.<br />
The effect <strong>of</strong> diameter ratios a/L on the relation between the friction factor and the Dean<br />
number has been investigated numerically by [16] and is fo<strong>und</strong> to be negligibly small. They<br />
concluded the friction factor ratio is relatively insensitive to the diameter ratios at a given Dean<br />
number. However in 1988 [18] for corresponding curved pipe problem tried to make experiment<br />
to match the series extension, would have to satisfy that is the flow be fully developed at high<br />
Dean number namely bigger than 500 and laminar as well as a/L less than .03. But his result adds<br />
another mystery to this paradox and they obtained data, which lay closer to the present method. In<br />
Speaker: MANSOUR, K. 113 <strong>BAIL</strong> <strong>2006</strong><br />
✩<br />
✪