1 Check-list of Cladosporium names Frank M. DUGAN, Konstanze ...

phlei (C.T. Greg.) G.A. de Vries, Contr. Knowl. Genus Cladosporium: 49 (1952)!.
T: on Phleum pratense (Poaceae), USA, New York, Ithaca, greenhouse, 6 Apr. 1918, Gregory
10498 (CUP: holotype).
≡ Heterosporium phlei C.T. Greg., Phytopathology 9: 580 (1919)!.
= ? Cladosporium herbarum var. macrosporum Lagière, Ann. École Natl. Agric. Grignon, Sér.
3, 5: 159 (1946)!.
Lit.: MATSUSHIMA (1975: 36), ELLIS (1976: 334), ELLIS & ELLIS (1985: 508), DAVID (1988d,
1997: 90), HO et al. (1999: 139).
Ill.: GREGORY (1919: 579, Fig. 2), MATSUSHIMA (1975: Pl. 53, Figs 1–2), ELLIS (1976: 335,
Fig. 254), DAVID (1988d: 1, Fig.; 1997: 91, Fig. 23), HO et al. (1999: 141, Figs 40–41).
Host(s)/substrate(s) & distribution: on Phleum pratense; Asia (Armenia, Japan), Europe
(Byelorussia, Germany, Denmark, Eire, Estonia, Great Britain, Norway, Russia, Sweden),
North America (Canada: Que., USA: most states), New Zealand.
phlei-pratensis Sawada, Bull. Gov. Forest Exp. Sta. 105: 96 (1958)!, as ‘phlei-pratense’, nom.
inval.
T: on leaves of Phleum pratense (Poaceae), Japan, Tohoku District, 27 Jul. 1940, Iizuka
(10516) and 18 Jul. 1941, Ikeda (10440).
Notes: In the original diagnosis two collections were mentioned but the author did not
designate a type.
phoenicis ‘Fautrey’, Rev. Mycol. (Toulouse) 13: 133 (1891)!.
Lit.: SACCARDO (1892: 604).
Notes: This species was not described by Fautrey, rather it refers to Roumeguère, see next
entry.
phoenicis Roum., F. sel. gall. exs., Cent. 58, No. 5798 (1891)! and Rev. Mycol. (Toulouse)
13: 133 (1891)!, as ‘phaenicis’.
T: on leaves of Phoenix tenuis (Arecaceae), France, Toulouse, 1891, G. Machado, Roum., F.
sel. gall. exs. 5798 (e.g., B; FH).
= Cladosporium herbarum (Pers.: Fr.) Link, Ges. Naturf. Freunde Berlin Mag. Neuesten
Entdeck. Gesammten Naturk. 7: 37 (1816)!.
phragmitis J. Opiz, in Opiz, Seznam: 117 (1852), nom. nud., non C. phragmitis J. Opiz ex
Oudem., 1892.
T: on leaves of Phragmites communis (= P. australis) (Poaceae), Czech Republic (PRM).
= Heterosporium phragmitis Sacc., in Saccardo & Roumeguère, Rev. Mycol. (Toulouse) 6: 37
(1884), as ‘(Opiz?) Sacc.’.
Lit.: SACCARDO (1886: 370), LINDAU (1907: 814), OUDEMANS (1919), DE VRIES (1952: 96).
phragmitis J. Opiz ex Oudem., Ned. Kruidk. Arch., Ser. 2, 6(1): 57 (1892)!.
T: on leaves of Phragmites communis (= P. australis) (Poaceae), Netherlands, Bien de
Campagne Zorgvlied, near Haye, Jul. 1889, C.E. Destrée.
≡ Cladosporium oudemansii Kupka, Oesterr. Bot. Z. 67: 157 (1918)!.
= Helminthosporium arundinaceum Corda, Icon. fung. 3: 10 (1839), as ‘Helmisporium’.
≡ Napicladium arundinaceum (Corda) Sacc., Syll. fung. 4: 482 (1886)!.
≡ Deightoniella arundinacea (Corda) S. Hughes, Mycol. Pap. 48: 29 (1952)!.
Lit.: DE VRIES (1952: 96), DAVID (1997: 137).
Notes: DAVID (1997): ‘OUDEMANS (1892) provided a description of what he took to be Opiz’s
species. This description, also given by LINDAU (1907), is of an entirely different fungus, as
noted by KUPKA (1918) and DE VRIES (1952).’.
phyllachorae M.B. Ellis, More Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes: 332 (1976)!.
T: on Catacauma apoensis (= Phyllachora) (Phyllachoraceae) on leaves of Ficus nervosa
(Moraceae), Philippines, Samar, Mar.–Apr. 1914, M. Ramos (Bur. Sc. 17616).
≡ Monotospora parasitica Syd. & P. Syd., Ann. Mycol. 15: 263 (1917)!, non Cladosporium
parasiticum Sorokīn, 1891.
Lit.: HEUCHERT et al. (2005: 56–57).
81