04.02.2013 Views

Technical Design Report Super Fragment Separator

Technical Design Report Super Fragment Separator

Technical Design Report Super Fragment Separator

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DRAFT<br />

Figure 2.4.116: Schematic view of the degrader systems, which will be installed at the focal planes PF2,<br />

MF2, and MF11 of the <strong>Super</strong>-FRS. They consist of two rotating parts with wedge-shaped disks to generate<br />

the wedge-angle α and two linear drives equipped with rectangular wedges for the continuous thickness<br />

variation. Additional degrader plates may be added on an additional linear drive (not shown).<br />

Detailed investigations [4,7,58,59] have been carried out to investigate the performance of a<br />

fragment separator employing a degrader system in dependence of the degrader material. These<br />

studies take into account nuclear absorption in the material, atomic processes like energy-loss<br />

straggling, small-angle scattering and charge-exchange, and the transport of the ions through the<br />

ion-optical system. Although for the lightest ions (A < 20) a very light degrader material would be<br />

preferred, the overall optimum choice yielding high transmission for all nuclei is a medium-heavy<br />

element, like e.g. aluminium. Because of practical reasons, also quartz will be investigated (see<br />

below).<br />

The energy spread additionally imposed on the fragments when penetrating through the degrader is<br />

the limiting factor of the resolution for the subsequent magnetic rigidity analysis. Thus it needs to<br />

be minimized and adjusted to the ion-optical resolution. Energy-loss straggling is unavoidable and<br />

thus the ultimate limitation. Practically, the main limitation arises from inhomogeneities and imperfect<br />

alignment of the degraders. The real shape of the degraders should match as good as possible<br />

the ideal shape, thickness non uniformities arising from inhomogeneous material (density)<br />

and/or surface inhomogeneities must be minimized. The tables given below show the tolerable<br />

values such, that the inhomogeneities cause the same width at the final focus as does the energy-loss<br />

straggling. These tolerances are of the order of few ten micrometers in order to preserve<br />

the ion-optical resolution, so that the degrader plates and the mechanical holders and drives require<br />

very high precision.<br />

Because of the strong requirements, quality control is an important issue. Although several different<br />

manufacturers promise to fulfil the specifications (shape tolerances, surface uniformity,<br />

density homogeneity), it has turned out that quality control needs to be done in-house. In the past<br />

years, the GSI target laboratory has developed tools to measure tolerances on a micrometer scale.<br />

The best results have been obtained with quartz material, which showed sub-micron surface tolerances<br />

and deviations from the ideal shape of very few microns only. Thus, from this point of view<br />

quartz is the preferred material. However, due to the manufacturing process, the minimum thickness<br />

is limited to values exceeding about 5 millimetres for each plate thus yielding at present only<br />

rather thick plates. In the near future we will explore other possibilities together with industry.<br />

According to the specifications, the prototype system described in section 2.4.11.2.3 already<br />

reaches this precision. In an experiment we have tested Suprasil®-2 material (which is quartz-type<br />

126

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!