Technical Design Report Super Fragment Separator
Technical Design Report Super Fragment Separator
Technical Design Report Super Fragment Separator
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
DRAFT<br />
radiation shielding in the limited space of the separator. All materials should be good heat conductors.<br />
The entrance material should be low in mass number (A) to avoid too high temperatures. This can<br />
already be seen from the simple formula below for the temperature rise (∆T) due to a number of<br />
particles (N) characterized by a stopping power dE/d(ρx), a beam spot area σ 2 , and a molar heat<br />
capacity (Cmol), which for high temperatures becomes a constant defined by Avogadro's number<br />
(NA)and Boltzmann's constant (kB).<br />
dE / d(<br />
ρx)<br />
A<br />
∆T<br />
= N<br />
; Cmol<br />
= 3N<br />
Ak<br />
2<br />
B<br />
σ C<br />
mol<br />
for high<br />
As dE/d(ρx) only moderately changes for different A and Z of the stopping materials, low A is<br />
clearly preferable.<br />
Energy deposition in different materials<br />
Besides the beam spot size the density of the deposited energy also depends on the amount of<br />
nuclear reactions of the primary beam. Simulations with the codes FLUKA [43,44] and PHITS<br />
[41] were performed to study the energy deposition taking into account both nuclear and atomic<br />
interactions and the contributions of the secondary beam. An example for 10 12 Uranium at 740<br />
MeV/u dumped in carbon with a round Gaussian beam spot with σ = 1 cm is shown in Figure<br />
2.4.107. In this calculation the initial energy spread was assumed to be zero. Without fragmentation<br />
the ratio of the stopping power at the entrance and in the Bragg peak would be 6.9 [45].<br />
However, nuclear reactions reduce this ratio to 3.1.<br />
In Li and Be the nuclear reaction rate is higher compared to the energy-loss cross section. Therefore,<br />
the Bragg peak would be reduced by an even larger factor. Values are listed in Table 2.4.25.<br />
The same conclusions hold for higher initial energies.<br />
The density of energy deposition in the bulk material can also be reduced by geometrical shaping<br />
of the entrance of the beam catcher such that the range straggling is enhanced. In the example of<br />
Figure 2.4.107 the ratio of the peak to entrance energy deposition has been reduced to about 1.8<br />
with an inclined surface of a slope of 0.1.<br />
In Table 2.4.25 the specific energy deposition and the resulting temperature and pressure rise are<br />
compared for different materials. Lithium has the lowest mass number and therefore the temperature<br />
rise has the lowest value. Beryllium and graphite have a rather high Debye temperature<br />
and do not reach their full heat capacity at room temperature.<br />
T<br />
114