04.02.2013 Views

Technical Design Report Super Fragment Separator

Technical Design Report Super Fragment Separator

Technical Design Report Super Fragment Separator

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DRAFT<br />

radiation shielding in the limited space of the separator. All materials should be good heat conductors.<br />

The entrance material should be low in mass number (A) to avoid too high temperatures. This can<br />

already be seen from the simple formula below for the temperature rise (∆T) due to a number of<br />

particles (N) characterized by a stopping power dE/d(ρx), a beam spot area σ 2 , and a molar heat<br />

capacity (Cmol), which for high temperatures becomes a constant defined by Avogadro's number<br />

(NA)and Boltzmann's constant (kB).<br />

dE / d(<br />

ρx)<br />

A<br />

∆T<br />

= N<br />

; Cmol<br />

= 3N<br />

Ak<br />

2<br />

B<br />

σ C<br />

mol<br />

for high<br />

As dE/d(ρx) only moderately changes for different A and Z of the stopping materials, low A is<br />

clearly preferable.<br />

Energy deposition in different materials<br />

Besides the beam spot size the density of the deposited energy also depends on the amount of<br />

nuclear reactions of the primary beam. Simulations with the codes FLUKA [43,44] and PHITS<br />

[41] were performed to study the energy deposition taking into account both nuclear and atomic<br />

interactions and the contributions of the secondary beam. An example for 10 12 Uranium at 740<br />

MeV/u dumped in carbon with a round Gaussian beam spot with σ = 1 cm is shown in Figure<br />

2.4.107. In this calculation the initial energy spread was assumed to be zero. Without fragmentation<br />

the ratio of the stopping power at the entrance and in the Bragg peak would be 6.9 [45].<br />

However, nuclear reactions reduce this ratio to 3.1.<br />

In Li and Be the nuclear reaction rate is higher compared to the energy-loss cross section. Therefore,<br />

the Bragg peak would be reduced by an even larger factor. Values are listed in Table 2.4.25.<br />

The same conclusions hold for higher initial energies.<br />

The density of energy deposition in the bulk material can also be reduced by geometrical shaping<br />

of the entrance of the beam catcher such that the range straggling is enhanced. In the example of<br />

Figure 2.4.107 the ratio of the peak to entrance energy deposition has been reduced to about 1.8<br />

with an inclined surface of a slope of 0.1.<br />

In Table 2.4.25 the specific energy deposition and the resulting temperature and pressure rise are<br />

compared for different materials. Lithium has the lowest mass number and therefore the temperature<br />

rise has the lowest value. Beryllium and graphite have a rather high Debye temperature<br />

and do not reach their full heat capacity at room temperature.<br />

T<br />

114

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!