Border Protector Michael J. Fisher - KMI Media Group
Border Protector Michael J. Fisher - KMI Media Group
Border Protector Michael J. Fisher - KMI Media Group
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
WAASS must fit within the size, weight and power capabilities<br />
of an Orion P-3 or Predator B unmanned aerial system (UAS). “We<br />
named these two platforms to suggest we can’t use huge Global<br />
Hawks because they are too expensive and big,” Appleby said. “We<br />
would like to use WAASS on many small to medium aircraft but not<br />
on huge UASs. It could also be used on fixed and aerostat platforms.<br />
We would like flexibility so we can use it on many platforms.” DHS<br />
wants WAASS to be already integrated, or easily integrated, on<br />
necessary platforms.<br />
WAASS will need electro-optical (EO) and infrared (IR) sensors<br />
for day and night surveillance. “We need to look at radar too,”<br />
Appleby noted. “It needs to be all-weather.”<br />
Integration of WAASS with CPB and USCG systems could be<br />
expensive. “They might take it as a service for a while, and then<br />
integrate it later on their own,” Appleby said.<br />
Wide area surveillance systems now used by the military tend to<br />
be heavy, 500 to 1,000 pounds, and mostly used for forensic surveillance,<br />
explained Chuck Willoughby, senior program manager at L-3<br />
Integrated Optical Systems.<br />
L-3 IOS has concentrated on tactical wide-area surveillance,<br />
for which coverage is generally limited to the area of battalion<br />
operations. “We wanted a system that was affordable, provided<br />
coverage in real time and could ‘chip’ out a video stream for<br />
ROVER [Remotely Operated Video Enhanced Receiver], One System<br />
Remote Video Terminal and VideoScout handheld devices,”<br />
Willoughby explained.<br />
The Office of Naval Research sought a surveillance system<br />
for the RQ-7 Shadow 200 UAS with Tactical Common Data Link<br />
(TCDL). L-3 IOS and another company were selected for the project<br />
two years ago and L-3 was down-selected to continue with the<br />
program, UltraWide, in December 2011.<br />
The key technology is mid-wave infrared (MWIR) focal plane<br />
array with a very large format, 4,096 by 4,096 pixels, or 16 megapixels.<br />
A single camera weighs just 50 to 60 pounds and is stabilized<br />
with a trunnion so it can keep focus as the UAS continues flight.<br />
L-3’s Instant Situational Awareness Wide Field of View (ISAW)<br />
device did test flights in July 2011 on a Cessna 208 Caravan. It can<br />
send video streams to ROVERs or VideoScouts.<br />
“We are looking to apply it to other aircraft,” Willoughby said.<br />
“We hope we can put it on Wescam turrets, MX-15 size and above.”<br />
ISAW could be combined with other cameras in turrets and put<br />
on the RQ-1 Predator, the MQ-1C Grey Eagle, manned aircraft or<br />
aerostats.<br />
ISAW can do border security on land and broad area maritime<br />
surveillance on P-8 Poseidons or UASs like MQ-8 Fire Scout. Willoughby<br />
argued that border security requires a mix of devices and<br />
platforms including aerial and aerostat.<br />
MWIR cameras see in day and night but are not all-weather sensors<br />
like radar. “ISAW can see through haze, but for all weather you<br />
would want to augment with radar,” Willoughby explained.<br />
ISAW typically covers a square kilometer on 16 megapixels,<br />
yielding resolution of a quarter meter, “good for detection and<br />
tracking personnel,” Willoughby said. ISAW usually flies at 7,500<br />
feet. Coverage can be expanded with altitude, but resolution<br />
declines. Other systems use multiple cameras for wider fields,<br />
but this increases weight and requires stitching images together,<br />
unlike UltraWide’s single camera.<br />
L-3 IOS is developing UltraWide for the Shadow by 2015 or<br />
2016. It plans to increase the array to 64 megapixels.<br />
26 | BCD 1.1<br />
“It’s the most economic technology, the most compact and has<br />
the least data burdens,” Willoughby summarized. Since data transmission<br />
is a challenge, ISAW can chip out a section of the image,<br />
640 by 640 pixels selected by the user, for streaming to the ground.<br />
Automating selection may be practical for maritime surveillance<br />
with little clutter, but would be tough for land images with many<br />
moving objects. L-3 wants to develop zoom capabilities.<br />
L-3 IOS is developing ISAW variants for pods and insertion in<br />
MX-15 turrets. Variants would typically operate between 15,000<br />
and 20,000 feet and could be cued by other sensors—for example,<br />
signals intelligence that can locate but not view surveillance targets.<br />
ISAW itself could cue ‘soda straw’ sensors for a closer look<br />
at targets to determine intent. Other L-3 divisions have developed<br />
ISR platforms for lease by customers as ‘surveillance by the hour.’<br />
Persistent Surveillance Systems (PSS) has a teaming agreement<br />
with Goodrich and has produced a new generation of both airborne<br />
and ground-based wide-area surveillance sensors, designed to be<br />
affordable, turn-key solutions.<br />
PSS provides both EO and IR systems to track vehicles and<br />
people over areas up to 25 square miles. Its surveillance technologies<br />
can monitor entire cities and borders at resolutions allowing<br />
tracking of vehicles and people, according to Lisa Beam, director<br />
of external relations.<br />
PSS’s systems can integrate with existing cameras to enhance<br />
image analysis of forensic data for many uses, including border<br />
security.<br />
Beam said nearly all full motion video-based surveillance has<br />
so far been limited by low resolution and narrow field-of-view.<br />
“Traditional surveillance sensors, such as camera balls and video<br />
cameras, are not very effective because they depend on looking in<br />
the right spot to capture an event,” Beam said. But PSS uses wide<br />
area survey mode or persistent stare mode to allow wider fields of<br />
view. “All data is archived so events can be analyzed in real time or<br />
forensically to recreate the sequence of events.”<br />
According to Beam, PSS has developed systems that provide<br />
a field of view equivalent to nearly 300 full motion video cameras<br />
normally found on surveillance aircraft. PSS’s Hawkeye, Hawkeye<br />
II and Nighthawk deliver real-time, high-resolution imagery for<br />
tracking individuals and vehicles in very large areas. An intuitive<br />
tracking system, I-View, allows multiple users to monitor several<br />
events simultaneously.<br />
The first-generation Hawkeye offers 88 megapixels resolution<br />
in black and white, typically covering four miles by four miles.<br />
Hawkeye II offers 192 megapixels of three-color images over an<br />
area up to five by five miles. The Nighthawk is an EO and MWIR<br />
sensor for day and night. Inherent EO resolution is 22 megapixels,<br />
with four megapixels for MWIR. Step-stare quadruples MWIR resolution<br />
to 88 and 16 megapixels.<br />
All PSS systems have easy-to-use interfaces, can store hours<br />
of imagery and support up to 10 remote user stations. PSS also<br />
offers full-service solutions, including PSS aircraft, pilots, on-air<br />
image processors, real-time downlinks, command centers and user<br />
stations, secure data server and storage, on-site technical support,<br />
training and analysis. O<br />
For more information, contact BCD Editor<br />
Brian O’Shea at briano@kmimediagroup.com<br />
or search our online archives for related stories at www.BCD-kmi.com.<br />
www.BCD-kmi.com