04.02.2013 Views

Border Protector Michael J. Fisher - KMI Media Group

Border Protector Michael J. Fisher - KMI Media Group

Border Protector Michael J. Fisher - KMI Media Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WAASS must fit within the size, weight and power capabilities<br />

of an Orion P-3 or Predator B unmanned aerial system (UAS). “We<br />

named these two platforms to suggest we can’t use huge Global<br />

Hawks because they are too expensive and big,” Appleby said. “We<br />

would like to use WAASS on many small to medium aircraft but not<br />

on huge UASs. It could also be used on fixed and aerostat platforms.<br />

We would like flexibility so we can use it on many platforms.” DHS<br />

wants WAASS to be already integrated, or easily integrated, on<br />

necessary platforms.<br />

WAASS will need electro-optical (EO) and infrared (IR) sensors<br />

for day and night surveillance. “We need to look at radar too,”<br />

Appleby noted. “It needs to be all-weather.”<br />

Integration of WAASS with CPB and USCG systems could be<br />

expensive. “They might take it as a service for a while, and then<br />

integrate it later on their own,” Appleby said.<br />

Wide area surveillance systems now used by the military tend to<br />

be heavy, 500 to 1,000 pounds, and mostly used for forensic surveillance,<br />

explained Chuck Willoughby, senior program manager at L-3<br />

Integrated Optical Systems.<br />

L-3 IOS has concentrated on tactical wide-area surveillance,<br />

for which coverage is generally limited to the area of battalion<br />

operations. “We wanted a system that was affordable, provided<br />

coverage in real time and could ‘chip’ out a video stream for<br />

ROVER [Remotely Operated Video Enhanced Receiver], One System<br />

Remote Video Terminal and VideoScout handheld devices,”<br />

Willoughby explained.<br />

The Office of Naval Research sought a surveillance system<br />

for the RQ-7 Shadow 200 UAS with Tactical Common Data Link<br />

(TCDL). L-3 IOS and another company were selected for the project<br />

two years ago and L-3 was down-selected to continue with the<br />

program, UltraWide, in December 2011.<br />

The key technology is mid-wave infrared (MWIR) focal plane<br />

array with a very large format, 4,096 by 4,096 pixels, or 16 megapixels.<br />

A single camera weighs just 50 to 60 pounds and is stabilized<br />

with a trunnion so it can keep focus as the UAS continues flight.<br />

L-3’s Instant Situational Awareness Wide Field of View (ISAW)<br />

device did test flights in July 2011 on a Cessna 208 Caravan. It can<br />

send video streams to ROVERs or VideoScouts.<br />

“We are looking to apply it to other aircraft,” Willoughby said.<br />

“We hope we can put it on Wescam turrets, MX-15 size and above.”<br />

ISAW could be combined with other cameras in turrets and put<br />

on the RQ-1 Predator, the MQ-1C Grey Eagle, manned aircraft or<br />

aerostats.<br />

ISAW can do border security on land and broad area maritime<br />

surveillance on P-8 Poseidons or UASs like MQ-8 Fire Scout. Willoughby<br />

argued that border security requires a mix of devices and<br />

platforms including aerial and aerostat.<br />

MWIR cameras see in day and night but are not all-weather sensors<br />

like radar. “ISAW can see through haze, but for all weather you<br />

would want to augment with radar,” Willoughby explained.<br />

ISAW typically covers a square kilometer on 16 megapixels,<br />

yielding resolution of a quarter meter, “good for detection and<br />

tracking personnel,” Willoughby said. ISAW usually flies at 7,500<br />

feet. Coverage can be expanded with altitude, but resolution<br />

declines. Other systems use multiple cameras for wider fields,<br />

but this increases weight and requires stitching images together,<br />

unlike UltraWide’s single camera.<br />

L-3 IOS is developing UltraWide for the Shadow by 2015 or<br />

2016. It plans to increase the array to 64 megapixels.<br />

26 | BCD 1.1<br />

“It’s the most economic technology, the most compact and has<br />

the least data burdens,” Willoughby summarized. Since data transmission<br />

is a challenge, ISAW can chip out a section of the image,<br />

640 by 640 pixels selected by the user, for streaming to the ground.<br />

Automating selection may be practical for maritime surveillance<br />

with little clutter, but would be tough for land images with many<br />

moving objects. L-3 wants to develop zoom capabilities.<br />

L-3 IOS is developing ISAW variants for pods and insertion in<br />

MX-15 turrets. Variants would typically operate between 15,000<br />

and 20,000 feet and could be cued by other sensors—for example,<br />

signals intelligence that can locate but not view surveillance targets.<br />

ISAW itself could cue ‘soda straw’ sensors for a closer look<br />

at targets to determine intent. Other L-3 divisions have developed<br />

ISR platforms for lease by customers as ‘surveillance by the hour.’<br />

Persistent Surveillance Systems (PSS) has a teaming agreement<br />

with Goodrich and has produced a new generation of both airborne<br />

and ground-based wide-area surveillance sensors, designed to be<br />

affordable, turn-key solutions.<br />

PSS provides both EO and IR systems to track vehicles and<br />

people over areas up to 25 square miles. Its surveillance technologies<br />

can monitor entire cities and borders at resolutions allowing<br />

tracking of vehicles and people, according to Lisa Beam, director<br />

of external relations.<br />

PSS’s systems can integrate with existing cameras to enhance<br />

image analysis of forensic data for many uses, including border<br />

security.<br />

Beam said nearly all full motion video-based surveillance has<br />

so far been limited by low resolution and narrow field-of-view.<br />

“Traditional surveillance sensors, such as camera balls and video<br />

cameras, are not very effective because they depend on looking in<br />

the right spot to capture an event,” Beam said. But PSS uses wide<br />

area survey mode or persistent stare mode to allow wider fields of<br />

view. “All data is archived so events can be analyzed in real time or<br />

forensically to recreate the sequence of events.”<br />

According to Beam, PSS has developed systems that provide<br />

a field of view equivalent to nearly 300 full motion video cameras<br />

normally found on surveillance aircraft. PSS’s Hawkeye, Hawkeye<br />

II and Nighthawk deliver real-time, high-resolution imagery for<br />

tracking individuals and vehicles in very large areas. An intuitive<br />

tracking system, I-View, allows multiple users to monitor several<br />

events simultaneously.<br />

The first-generation Hawkeye offers 88 megapixels resolution<br />

in black and white, typically covering four miles by four miles.<br />

Hawkeye II offers 192 megapixels of three-color images over an<br />

area up to five by five miles. The Nighthawk is an EO and MWIR<br />

sensor for day and night. Inherent EO resolution is 22 megapixels,<br />

with four megapixels for MWIR. Step-stare quadruples MWIR resolution<br />

to 88 and 16 megapixels.<br />

All PSS systems have easy-to-use interfaces, can store hours<br />

of imagery and support up to 10 remote user stations. PSS also<br />

offers full-service solutions, including PSS aircraft, pilots, on-air<br />

image processors, real-time downlinks, command centers and user<br />

stations, secure data server and storage, on-site technical support,<br />

training and analysis. O<br />

For more information, contact BCD Editor<br />

Brian O’Shea at briano@kmimediagroup.com<br />

or search our online archives for related stories at www.BCD-kmi.com.<br />

www.BCD-kmi.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!