02.02.2013 Views

Fauna of NZ 45 - Landcare Research

Fauna of NZ 45 - Landcare Research

Fauna of NZ 45 - Landcare Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Fauna</strong> <strong>of</strong> New Zealand <strong>45</strong> 17<br />

KEY TO FAMILIES OF ADULT NEW ZEALAND<br />

CURCULIONOIDEA<br />

1 Antennae straight (orthocerous, non-elbowed), funicle<br />

following direction <strong>of</strong> scape (Fig. 1), if elbowed, or<br />

subgeniculate as in Fig. 10, then trochanters elongate,<br />

separating femora from coxae .................................. 2<br />

—Antennae elbowed (geniculate, gonatocerous), funicle<br />

deflected from direction <strong>of</strong> scape in an angle (Fig. 181),<br />

trochanters short, not separating femora from coxae<br />

.......................................................... Curculionidae<br />

2(1) Labrum free, distinct, separated from clypeus by a<br />

distinct suture (Fig. 19–26) ..................................... 3<br />

—Labrum not distinct, fused with clypeus (Fig. 175, 176)<br />

................................................................................. 4<br />

3(2)Labrum finely braced to clypeus, separated by a fine<br />

suture (Fig. 173). Prothorax lacking a transverse carina.<br />

Elytral puncta lined up to form perfect striae (Fig. 2).<br />

All tibiae having spurs ..... (p. 17) ... Nemonychidae<br />

—Labrum loosely articulated to clypeus, separated by a<br />

deep, manifest suture (Fig. 174). Prothorax usually<br />

with a transverse carina. Elytral puncta not lined up<br />

into distinct striae. All tibiae lacking spurs ...............<br />

....... (<strong>Fauna</strong> N.Z. 3, Holloway 1982) ... Anthribidae<br />

4(2)Fore tibia with a grooming device on inner face opposite<br />

tarsal insertion, consisting <strong>of</strong> dense, fine vestiture in a<br />

broad groove or impression (Fig. 183, 184). Gular<br />

suture double or absent. Elytra irregularly punctate; if<br />

puncta arranged into striae, then a scutellar striole<br />

distinct. Abdomen in lateral view having all ventrites at<br />

same level ..................................... (p. 21) ... Belidae<br />

—Fore tibia lacking a grooming device on inner face opposite<br />

tarsal insertion (Fig. 182). Gular suture single, distinct.<br />

Elytra distinctly striate, always lacking a scutellar<br />

striole. Abdomen in lateral view having ventrites 1 and<br />

2 deeper down than 3 to 5 ....... (p. 31) ... Brentidae<br />

DESCRIPTIONS<br />

Family NEMONYCHIDAE<br />

The family Nemonychidae in New Zealand is represented<br />

solely by the genus Rhinorhynchus which comprises four<br />

species associated with Podocarpaceae and Phyllocladaceae.<br />

All four species are found on the same wide range <strong>of</strong> hosts<br />

and obtained, occasionally, concurrently on the same shrub<br />

or tree. Rhinorhynchus is the type genus <strong>of</strong> the subfamily<br />

Rhinorhynchinae, to which all the southern hemisphere<br />

Nemonychidae belong, as well as a few species from Central<br />

America and the United States.<br />

Genus Rhinorhynchus Sharp<br />

Fig. 1, 2, 19–26<br />

Sharp, 1882: 88 (type-species R. zealandicus Sharp<br />

[=Rhinomacer rufulus Broun, 1880]). —Voss, 1922: 17,<br />

19; 1932: 101, 106. —Crowson, 1953: 240, 242; 1955:<br />

158. —Kuschel, 1959: 237. —May, 1993: 27 (larva).<br />

Listrorhinus Voss, 1922: 9, 13 (as subg. <strong>of</strong> Rhinomacer; typespecies<br />

Rhinomacer rufulus Broun, 1880)); 1931: 164;<br />

1932: 72.<br />

Head weakly to distinctly constricted a short distance behind<br />

eyes. Frons anteriorly twice as wide as rostrum across<br />

antennal insertions, or wider. Eyes in lateral view round,<br />

with moderately coarse ommatidia. Rostrum moderately<br />

long, in male a little shorter than prothorax, in female slightly<br />

longer than prothorax; scrobes indistinct, shallow, lacking<br />

a defined dorsal edge; pubescence on basal part directed<br />

basad. Antennae distant from mandibular sockets by twice<br />

width <strong>of</strong> scape or more; segment 1 (scape) thin, not distinctly<br />

thicker than segment 2, a little compressed especially<br />

in female; segment 2 slightly thicker and distinctly<br />

longer than 3. Labrum as in Fig. 27, small, sinuously triangular,<br />

broader in male, with four short peg-like setae at<br />

apex and two pairs <strong>of</strong> setiferous puncta on dorsal surface.<br />

Mandibles as in Fig. 28, slender, long, falciform, unarmed,<br />

lacking a dorsolateral groove, with a row <strong>of</strong> fine punctation<br />

instead, ending with a long seta. Maxillary palpi (Fig. 28)<br />

short, flexible, with segments loosely articulated; segments<br />

2 and 3 subequal, 4 as long as other three combined.<br />

Postmentum broad, with lateroapical angles rounded.<br />

Prothorax relatively longer in male, weakly impressed<br />

on either side <strong>of</strong> midline near base. Elytra distinctly,<br />

regularly striate, with supernumerary puncta on interstria<br />

10 alongside metasternum. Hind wing (Fig. <strong>45</strong>) fully<br />

developed; anal veins weakly sclerotised.<br />

Front coxae subconical, much closer to base than apex<br />

<strong>of</strong> prothorax. Front and middle tibiae with rather sharp<br />

dorsal edge (less distinct in R. rufulus); all tibiae with 2<br />

spurs in both sexes, in male incurved near apex and distinctly<br />

mucronate. Claws (Fig. 30) with dentiform appendix.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!