02.02.2013 Views

3c hapter - Index of

3c hapter - Index of

3c hapter - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Blue Skies, Pipe Dreams, and the Lure <strong>of</strong> Easy Money 23<br />

from federal regulations. It also created an “accredited investor”<br />

category. In addition to insiders and institutional investors, the<br />

defi nition encompassed affl uent individuals who, by dint <strong>of</strong> their<br />

wealth and the fi nancial sophistication that implied, did not<br />

require the protective coddling <strong>of</strong> the SEC. Private companies<br />

were now free to raise money from these well- heeled investors<br />

without going through a costly registration process. 5<br />

Just like that, the universe <strong>of</strong> investors was cleaved in two. If<br />

you had a net worth <strong>of</strong> $1 million or more, or annual income <strong>of</strong> at<br />

least $200,000 (later amended to $300,000 for couples), you were<br />

among the top 2 percent <strong>of</strong> Americans and could invest in pretty<br />

much anything you like. 6 The rest—the vast majority <strong>of</strong> Americans<br />

who failed to meet that standard—were free to buy publicly traded<br />

stocks, bonds, and mutual funds but were effectively barred from<br />

a wide range <strong>of</strong> investment opportunities in small, private ventures<br />

deemed too risky. Hereon, there would be two sets <strong>of</strong> rules<br />

for investing. 7<br />

To use Michael Shuman’s colorful analogy, it was the same<br />

philosophy that led to Prohibition: If you cannot be trusted to<br />

drink responsibly, we will ban drinking. If investors could not be<br />

trusted to invest their money wisely, the SEC would ban them<br />

from risky investments. Happily, reasonable minds prevailed and<br />

Prohibition was repealed in 1933. But we are still left with our<br />

dual- class investor system.<br />

To be fair, it is not an outright ban. The SEC over the years<br />

has carved out exemptions that make it easier for small companies<br />

to raise money from the public without the burdens <strong>of</strong> registration<br />

and ongoing reporting requirements. But there is an Alice<br />

in Wonderland- like madness to the rules, which inspire as many<br />

interpretations as there are legal experts. Reg D contains three<br />

different exemptions for small <strong>of</strong>ferings <strong>of</strong> under $1 million or<br />

$5 million. But two <strong>of</strong> them (Rules 505 and 506) limit the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> nonaccredited investors to 35, and those folks must be supplied<br />

with similar documentation and disclosure as would be required<br />

in a registered <strong>of</strong>fering, so many companies stick to accredited<br />

investors to simplify matters. There are also prohibitions<br />

on soliciting the general public (as Dante Hesse did when he

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!