Insect Control: Biological and Synthetic Agents - Index of
Insect Control: Biological and Synthetic Agents - Index of
Insect Control: Biological and Synthetic Agents - Index of
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Figure 8 Dihydropyrazole block appears as a parallel shift <strong>of</strong><br />
the steady state slow inactivation curve in the direction <strong>of</strong><br />
hyperpolarization. Ionic current traces were scaled by a common<br />
factor so that the peak at 120 mV matched the peak<br />
before treatment with the dihydropyrazole. Peak INa was depressed<br />
most at depolarized potentials, whereas outward current,<br />
IK, was not affected by the treatment. The graph shows<br />
plots <strong>of</strong> peak current normalized to the value at 120 mV. RH-<br />
3421 (10 mM) appears to shift the steady state inactivation relation<br />
to the left by 8.6 mV. (Reproduced with permission from<br />
Salgado, V.L., 1992. Slow voltage-dependent block <strong>of</strong> Na þ<br />
channels in crayfish nerve by dihydropyrazole insecticides.<br />
Mol. Pharmacol. 41, 120–126; ß American Society for Pharmacology<br />
<strong>and</strong> Experimental Therapeutics.)<br />
within 0.5 ms, then reversed <strong>and</strong> became outward.<br />
The inward (downward) peak is the Na þ current<br />
<strong>and</strong> the outward (upward) steady state current is<br />
the K þ current (Pichon <strong>and</strong> Ashcr<strong>of</strong>t, 1985). Depolarization<br />
<strong>of</strong> the axon to potentials more positive<br />
than 90 mV in the control suppressed the Na þ<br />
current by a process known as inactivation, which<br />
in this case had a midpoint potential <strong>of</strong> 77 mV.<br />
Na þ channels have two partially independent inactivation<br />
processes, known as fast <strong>and</strong> slow inactivation.<br />
Fast inactivation occurs on a millisecond<br />
timescale <strong>and</strong> serves to terminate the action potential,<br />
while slow inactivation occurs on a much slower<br />
timescale, over hundreds <strong>of</strong> milliseconds, <strong>and</strong> performs<br />
a slow, modulatory function. Slow inactivation<br />
occurs at more negative potentials than fast inactivation,<br />
<strong>and</strong> is responsible for the inactivation seen in<br />
Figure 8. After equilibration <strong>of</strong> the axon with RH-<br />
3421, there was no effect on either Na þ or K þ current<br />
at 120 or at 100 mV (Figure 8). At more depolarized<br />
potentials, however, the Na þ current was<br />
specifically depressed by RH-3421, whereas the K þ<br />
current was unaffected. When peak Na þ current is<br />
plotted against membrane potential, it appears that<br />
2: Indoxacarb <strong>and</strong> the Sodium Channel Blocker <strong>Insect</strong>icides 43<br />
Figure 9 A model showing the resting (R), Open (O), <strong>and</strong><br />
inactivated (I) states <strong>of</strong> the Na þ channel, <strong>and</strong> specific interaction<br />
<strong>of</strong> the SCBIs (D) with the inactivated state.<br />
RH-3421 has shifted the slow inactivation curve by<br />
9 mV to the left.<br />
The next step in the analysis is to consider the<br />
mechanism <strong>of</strong> this apparent shift <strong>of</strong> slow inactivation.<br />
Whereas fast inactivation occurs with a time course <strong>of</strong><br />
hundreds <strong>of</strong> microseconds to a few milliseconds, <strong>and</strong><br />
slow inactivation on the order <strong>of</strong> tens to hundreds <strong>of</strong><br />
milliseconds, the changes in peak Na þ current in the<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> SCBIs occur on a much slower timescale,<br />
on the order <strong>of</strong> 15 min. This slow readjustment <strong>of</strong><br />
peak current in response to voltage change can therefore<br />
be attributed to a new process: the binding <strong>and</strong><br />
unbinding <strong>of</strong> SCBIs to Na þ channels.<br />
The Na þ channel undergoes transitions between<br />
many different conformations or states, which can<br />
be grouped into resting (R), open (O), <strong>and</strong> inactivated<br />
(I) states, each <strong>of</strong> which may have several<br />
substates. The transitions between these naturally<br />
occurring states are shown on the left in Figure 9.<br />
In this simplified model, S1 ¼ [R]/[R] þ [I], is the<br />
steady-state slow inactivation parameter, which<br />
depends on membrane potential according to<br />
1<br />
S1 ¼<br />
½1Š<br />
1 þ exp½ðV VSÞ=kŠ<br />
where V is membrane potential, VS is the potential<br />
at which S1 ¼ 0.5 (half <strong>of</strong> the channels are in the<br />
inactivated state), <strong>and</strong> k is a constant that includes<br />
the Boltzmann constant <strong>and</strong> describes the voltage<br />
sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the inactivation process (Hodgkin <strong>and</strong><br />
Huxley, 1952).<br />
This model ignores the fast-inactivated state, but<br />
interaction <strong>of</strong> the SCBIs with the channels is so slow,<br />
that it <strong>and</strong> the open state, O, can be ignored in the<br />
analysis. The observed enhancement <strong>of</strong> slow inactivation<br />
can be explained if we assume that the SCBI<br />
drug (D) binds selectively to an inactivated state, as<br />
also shown on the right-h<strong>and</strong> side in the model<br />
(Figure 9). Drug binding would then effectively<br />
remove channels from the I pool, which would be<br />
compensated for by mass action rearrangements<br />
among the other states, leading to net flux <strong>of</strong> more<br />
receptors from the R pool into the I <strong>and</strong> D I pools.<br />
KI ¼ [D] [I]/[D I] is defined as the equilibrium<br />
dissociation constant <strong>of</strong> the D I complex.<br />
In the presence <strong>of</strong> SCBI drug, two processes lead to<br />
the decrease in current upon depolarization: slow