Insect Control: Biological and Synthetic Agents - Index of
Insect Control: Biological and Synthetic Agents - Index of
Insect Control: Biological and Synthetic Agents - Index of
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
338 10: Genetically Modified Baculoviruses for Pest <strong>Insect</strong> <strong>Control</strong><br />
recombinant AcMNPV may be able to induce the<br />
RNAi response more efficiently. Of course, a recombinant<br />
virus that is effective at prolonging the<br />
juvenile state would be a disaster as a biological<br />
insecticide. However, these experiments are important<br />
in that they demonstrate the effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />
an RNAi approach in the regulation <strong>of</strong> insect<br />
neuroendocrinology <strong>and</strong> the results should be<br />
easily transferred to other significant physiological<br />
effectors.<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> an authentic, insect-derived protein<br />
to combat the insect is conceptually elegant <strong>and</strong><br />
potentially safer because one is only trying to<br />
express an endogenous protein at an inappropriate<br />
time or at higher levels in order to alter the physiology<br />
<strong>of</strong> the insect. Additionally, there is a perception<br />
that expressing the insect’s own protein at an<br />
inappropriate time in development <strong>of</strong>fers public<br />
relations advantages over the expression <strong>of</strong> toxins<br />
or proteases as will be discussed below. In practice,<br />
however, overexpression <strong>of</strong> an insect hormone or<br />
protein involved in hormone metabolism has not<br />
been dramatically effective. For example, the limited<br />
number <strong>of</strong> JHEs tested to date not enhance the<br />
speed <strong>of</strong> kill as well as scorpion toxins or proteases.<br />
However, with JHE there is a clear mechanism <strong>of</strong><br />
action <strong>and</strong> an obvious path toward generating improved<br />
viruses by engineering the protein for greater<br />
stability in the insect. The recent homology model <strong>of</strong><br />
Thomas et al. (1999) <strong>and</strong> crystal structure <strong>of</strong> the<br />
protein will greatly enhance these efforts.<br />
10.2.3. Proteases<br />
In order to better underst<strong>and</strong> the rationale behind<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> protease encoding genes for improving<br />
speed <strong>of</strong> kill, a brief review <strong>of</strong> the midgut barriers<br />
faced by the baculovirus is given. The first barrier<br />
that the ODV encounters in the midgut is the fluid<br />
within the lumen. The high pH (8–11) <strong>and</strong> endogenous<br />
proteases found in the lumen are initially<br />
required to release ODVs from the polyhedra or<br />
granules. However, digestive enzymes or other factors<br />
within the lumen could also lead to the<br />
inactivation <strong>of</strong> the released ODV, if the ODVs do<br />
not quickly initiate infection. One such factor is a<br />
lipase, Bmlipase-1, isolated from the digestive juice<br />
<strong>of</strong> B. mori that shows antiviral activity against<br />
BmNPV (Ponnuvel et al., 2003). The peritrophic<br />
membrane (PM; or peritrophic envelope) is the first<br />
physical barrier that the ODV faces (Richards <strong>and</strong><br />
Richards, 1977; Br<strong>and</strong>t et al., 1978; Tellam, 1996).<br />
The PM is composed <strong>of</strong> chitin fibrils in a protein–<br />
carbohydrate matrix. The specific composition <strong>and</strong><br />
layout <strong>of</strong> the PM differs in different lepidopteran<br />
species <strong>and</strong> at different larval instars. The manner<br />
in which the ODVs pass this barrier is still not well<br />
understood. The second physical barrier that the<br />
virus faces is the midgut epithelium. The midgut<br />
epithelium is primarily composed <strong>of</strong> a single layer<br />
<strong>of</strong> columnar cells. The columnar cells show directionality<br />
(polarity) in which the luminal border is<br />
formed by microvilli (brush border membrane)<br />
<strong>and</strong> the hemocoelic border shows characteristic<br />
infolding with large numbers <strong>of</strong> mitochondria<br />
associated with the infolds. Regenerative <strong>and</strong> endocrine<br />
cells are also part <strong>of</strong> the midgut epithelium.<br />
Several pathways have been proposed for how the<br />
nucleocapsids pass through the midgut epithelium<br />
barrier following the fusion <strong>of</strong> ODVs with the<br />
microvillar membrane (Federici, 1997). One pathway<br />
involves entry <strong>of</strong> the nucleocapsid into the<br />
columnar cells, translocation through the cytoplasm,<br />
<strong>and</strong> budding through the hemocoelic border<br />
<strong>of</strong> the same cell without any viral replication. The<br />
other pathways involve the generation <strong>of</strong> progeny<br />
nucleocapsids within the columnar cells that can<br />
bud (1) through the hemocoelic border, (2) into the<br />
tracheal matrix via tracheoblasts, or (3) into regenerative<br />
cells. Once in the regenerative cells, the<br />
nucleocapsids may translocate through the cell<br />
without replication <strong>and</strong> through the hemocoelic<br />
border or virus replication may occur in these cells<br />
as well. Washburn et al. (2003) have proposed a<br />
‘‘hybrid’’ pathway in which some nucleocapsids <strong>of</strong><br />
MNPVs uncoat <strong>and</strong> start replication whereas others<br />
pass directly through the columnar cells. The third<br />
midgut associated barrier to systemic infection is the<br />
basement membrane (or basal lamina). The basement<br />
membrane (BM) is a fibrous matrix composed<br />
primarily <strong>of</strong> glycoproteins, type IV collagen, <strong>and</strong><br />
laminin, which are secreted by the epithelial cells<br />
(Ryerse, 1998). The BM functions in several roles<br />
including structural support <strong>of</strong> the epithelium or<br />
surrounding tissues, filtration, <strong>and</strong> differentiation<br />
(Yurchenco <strong>and</strong> O’Rear, 1993).<br />
10.2.3.1. Enhancins Enhancins are baculovirus<br />
encoded proteins that can enhance the oral infectivity<br />
<strong>of</strong> a heterologous or homologous baculovirus.<br />
Enhancin, also known as synergistic factor (SF) or<br />
virus enhancing factor (VEF), was first described by<br />
Tanada as a lipoprotein <strong>of</strong> 93–126 kDa found within<br />
the capsule <strong>of</strong> the GV <strong>of</strong> the armyworm Pseudaletia<br />
unipuncta (Yamamoto <strong>and</strong> Tanada, 1978a,<br />
1978b) that enhances the infection <strong>of</strong> baculoviruses<br />
in lepidopteran larvae (Tanada, 1959). The enhancin<br />
<strong>of</strong> the GV <strong>of</strong> T. ni (TnGV) has been shown to<br />
possess metalloprotease activity (Lepore et al., 1996;<br />
Wang <strong>and</strong> Granados, 1997). Tanada first suggested