Insect Control: Biological and Synthetic Agents - Index of
Insect Control: Biological and Synthetic Agents - Index of
Insect Control: Biological and Synthetic Agents - Index of
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
332 10: Genetically Modified Baculoviruses for Pest <strong>Insect</strong> <strong>Control</strong><br />
et al., 1998; Vail et al., 1999; Moscardi, 1999;<br />
Copping <strong>and</strong> Menn, 2000; Lacey et al., 2001).<br />
Both NPVs <strong>and</strong> GVs have been successfully<br />
registered for use as microbial pesticides by commercial<br />
companies <strong>and</strong> government agencies. NPVs<br />
<strong>of</strong> the velvetbean caterpillar Anticarsia gemmatalis<br />
(AgMNPV) <strong>and</strong> Helicoverpa armigera (HaSNPV)<br />
are being used with particular success for the protection<br />
<strong>of</strong> soybean in Brazil (Moscardi, 1999) <strong>and</strong><br />
cotton in China (Sun et al., 2002), respectively. Natural<br />
baculoviruses, however, are slower acting <strong>and</strong><br />
more target specific (i.e., their host specificity is<br />
narrow) compared to synthetic chemical pesticides<br />
such as the pyrethroids. The general use <strong>of</strong> natural<br />
baculoviruses in developed countries has been limited<br />
except against forest pests primarily due to their<br />
slow speed <strong>of</strong> insect killing compared to chemical<br />
insecticides, <strong>and</strong> partially due to their relatively narrow<br />
host specificity, low field stability, <strong>and</strong> cost <strong>of</strong><br />
production. As a natural control agent the ‘‘slow<br />
kill’’ characteristic allows the virus to replicate to<br />
tremendous numbers while allowing its host to feed<br />
for several days. Although an attribute in a natural<br />
control strategy, this trait is a severe limitation in<br />
modern agriculture. This trait <strong>and</strong> others such as<br />
narrow host specificity can <strong>and</strong> have been addressed<br />
by genetically modifying the baculovirus using<br />
recombinant DNA technology.<br />
During the 1980s, the birth <strong>of</strong> genetically modified<br />
(GM) baculoviruses came along with exciting<br />
new research in the laboratories <strong>of</strong> Summers<br />
(Summers <strong>and</strong> Smith, 1987) <strong>and</strong> Miller (1988).<br />
They simultaneously exploited a combination <strong>of</strong><br />
unique characteristics <strong>of</strong> NPVs to establish the baculovirus<br />
expression vector systems (BEVS) that are<br />
now in common use for basic research <strong>and</strong> commercial<br />
applications. These characteristics include:<br />
(1) the availability <strong>of</strong> the exceptionally strong<br />
polyhedrin gene (polh) promoter to drive foreign<br />
gene expression; (2) a selection system based<br />
upon the visualization <strong>of</strong> the nonessential (in<br />
cultured cells) gene product <strong>of</strong> the polyhedrin gene;<br />
(3) a dsDNA genome that can be easily modified;<br />
(4) a rod-shaped capsid that can extend to package<br />
additional DNA; <strong>and</strong> (5) a eukaryotic cell line that<br />
supports virus replication at high levels. Autographa<br />
californica multicapsid NPV (AcMNPV), originally<br />
isolated from the alfalfa looper A. californica<br />
(Vail et al., 1973, 1999), is the baculovirus type<br />
species. AcMNPV was used by the Summers <strong>and</strong><br />
Miller laboratories as the parental baculovirus for<br />
BEVS. Another baculovirus, Bombyx mori NPV<br />
(BmNPV), isolated from the silk moth B. mori,<br />
was used by Maeda (1989a) as the parental<br />
baculovirus in an alternative BEVS that used larvae<br />
<strong>of</strong> B. mori for in vivo expression. The methodologies<br />
for the construction <strong>and</strong> use <strong>of</strong> recombinant<br />
AcMNPVs <strong>and</strong> BmNPVs for the expression <strong>of</strong> heterologous<br />
genes have been thoroughly described<br />
(Summers <strong>and</strong> Smith, 1987; O’Reilly et al., 1992;<br />
Richardson, 1995; Merrington et al., 1999). These<br />
methodologies, with slight modifications, have also<br />
been used for the construction <strong>of</strong> GM baculovirus<br />
pesticides.<br />
The studies to date indicate that GM baculoviruses<br />
can easily become an integral part <strong>of</strong> pest<br />
insect control, especially in developing countries<br />
<strong>and</strong> for the control <strong>of</strong> insects that have become<br />
resistant to synthetic chemical pesticides (reviews:<br />
Hammock et al., 1993; McCutchen <strong>and</strong> Hammock,<br />
1994; Miller, 1995; Bonning <strong>and</strong> Hammock, 1996;<br />
Wood, 1996; Harrison <strong>and</strong> Bonning, 2000a;<br />
Inceoglu et al., 2001a; Bonning et al., 2002). Several<br />
innovative <strong>and</strong> successful approaches have been<br />
taken to improve the speed <strong>of</strong> kill <strong>of</strong> a baculovirus<br />
by genetic modification. These approaches include:<br />
(1) insertion <strong>of</strong> a foreign gene into the baculovirus<br />
genome whose product alters the physiology <strong>of</strong> the<br />
target host insect or is toxic towards the target<br />
host; (2) deletion <strong>of</strong> an endogenous gene from the<br />
baculovirus genome; <strong>and</strong> (3) incorporation <strong>of</strong><br />
active toxin into the OV. Combinations <strong>of</strong> these<br />
approaches have also been successful in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
decreasing the time required to kill the host or<br />
more importantly the time required to stop host<br />
feeding. Safe <strong>and</strong> effective protection <strong>of</strong> the crop<br />
from feeding damage should be the goal <strong>of</strong> a GM<br />
baculovirus pesticide. Baculoviruses have been<br />
transformed from natural disease agents to efficient<br />
pesticides through the above-mentioned discoveries<br />
<strong>and</strong> innovative approaches. Here, numerous innovations<br />
that have been used to improve the efficacy<br />
<strong>of</strong> baculoviruses for crop protection are discussed.<br />
Additionally, studies that have addressed the safety<br />
<strong>of</strong> natural <strong>and</strong> GM baculoviruses, especially in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> risk to humans, the environment, <strong>and</strong><br />
nontarget beneficial insects are also covered. The<br />
individual sections <strong>of</strong> this chapter provide a detailed<br />
<strong>and</strong> comprehensive summary <strong>of</strong> the field, especially<br />
in terms <strong>of</strong> improving the insecticidal activity <strong>of</strong><br />
GM baculoviruses. In Section 10.7, the reader<br />
will also find a discussion <strong>of</strong> the reasons why<br />
GM baculoviruses do not receive the interest that<br />
they deserve. The authors hope that after reading<br />
this review, the reader will be convinced that the<br />
currently available GM baculovirus pesticides are<br />
effective <strong>and</strong> safe, <strong>and</strong> should be used as biological<br />
pesticides.