01.02.2013 Views

Insect Control: Biological and Synthetic Agents - Index of

Insect Control: Biological and Synthetic Agents - Index of

Insect Control: Biological and Synthetic Agents - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

290 8: Mosquitocidal B. sphaericus: Toxins, Genetics, Mode <strong>of</strong> Action, Use, <strong>and</strong> Resistance Mechanisms<br />

8.3.1.1. Cytopathology <strong>and</strong> physiological<br />

effects Bti toxins completely breakdown the larval<br />

midgut epithelium, whereas B. sphaericus does not.<br />

Nevertheless, midgut alterations start within 15 min<br />

<strong>of</strong> feeding on B. sphaericus spore/crystal complex<br />

(Davidson, 1981; Karch <strong>and</strong> Coz, 1983; Charles,<br />

1987; Singh <strong>and</strong> Gill, 1988). There is no difference<br />

between midgut damage in C. pipiens after ingestion<br />

<strong>of</strong> spore/crystals from strains 1593 or 2297<br />

(Davidson, 1981; Charles, 1987; Singh <strong>and</strong> Gill,<br />

1988), even though these two strains belong to<br />

different Bin types. In contrast, symptoms <strong>of</strong> intoxication<br />

are not identical in different mosquito species.<br />

Large vacuoles (<strong>and</strong>/or cytolysosomes) appear<br />

in C. pipiens midgut cells, whereas large areas <strong>of</strong><br />

low electron density appear in Anopheles stephensi<br />

midgut cells (compare Figure 3c <strong>and</strong> d with the<br />

control, Figure 3b). Mitochondrial swelling is a<br />

general feature described for C. pipiens <strong>and</strong> A. stephensi,<br />

as well as for A. aegypti, when intoxicated<br />

with a very high dose <strong>of</strong> spore/crystals (Charles,<br />

1987). The midgut cells, especially cells <strong>of</strong> the posterior<br />

stomach <strong>and</strong> the gastric caecae, are the most<br />

severely damaged by the toxin, <strong>and</strong> Singh <strong>and</strong> Gill<br />

(Singh <strong>and</strong> Gill, 1988) also reported late damage<br />

to neural tissue <strong>and</strong> skeletal muscles.<br />

Ultrastructural effects have also been observed in<br />

cultured cells <strong>of</strong> C. quinquefasciatus within few<br />

minutes <strong>of</strong> treatment with soluble <strong>and</strong> activated<br />

B. sphaericus toxin. These alterations consisted<br />

mainly in the swelling <strong>of</strong> mitochondria cristae<br />

<strong>and</strong> endoplasmic reticula, followed by the enlargement<br />

<strong>of</strong> vacuoles <strong>and</strong> the condensation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mitochondrial matrix (Davidson et al., 1987).<br />

The physiological effects <strong>of</strong> B. sphaericus crystal<br />

toxin have been very poorly documented. The<br />

oxygen uptake <strong>of</strong> mitochondria isolated from<br />

B. sphaericus-treated C. quinquefasciatus larvae is<br />

inhibited, as is the activity <strong>of</strong> larval choline acetyl<br />

transferase (Narasu <strong>and</strong> Gopinathan, 1988). In addition,<br />

oxygen uptake by mitochondria isolated<br />

from rat liver is reduced by the B. sphaericus toxin<br />

(Narasu <strong>and</strong> Gopinathan, 1988).<br />

8.3.1.2. Binding to a specific receptor in the brush<br />

border membrane As the differences in susceptibility<br />

between mosquito species do not seem to be due<br />

to the ability to solubilize <strong>and</strong>/or to activate the<br />

binary toxin, the variation in susceptibility is presumably<br />

due to cellular differences. Indeed,<br />

fluorescently-labeled toxin binds to the gastric<br />

caecae <strong>and</strong> the posterior stomach only in very susceptible<br />

Culex species. BinB does not bind to the gut<br />

<strong>of</strong> Aedes aegypti, whereas BinA weakly <strong>and</strong> nonspecifically<br />

binds in this species, <strong>and</strong> no regionalized<br />

binding occurs for Anopheles (Davidson, 1988;<br />

Davidson, 1989; Davidson <strong>and</strong> Yousten, 1990;<br />

Oei et al., 1992). Furthermore, in C. quinquefasciatus,<br />

only BinB binds to the caecae <strong>and</strong> posterior<br />

stomach, <strong>and</strong> the binding <strong>of</strong> BinA appears to be<br />

conditioned by the binding <strong>of</strong> the BinB (Figure 4b),<br />

whereas BinA alone binds nonspecifically throughout<br />

the midgut (Figure 4a). This indicates that only<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the two components <strong>of</strong> the crystal toxin<br />

(putatively BinB) specifically binds to the midgut<br />

<strong>of</strong> susceptible larvae. The hypothesis that the<br />

N-terminal region <strong>of</strong> BinB is involved in regional<br />

binding <strong>of</strong> this protein in the larval midgut, <strong>and</strong><br />

that the C-terminal region <strong>of</strong> BinB, as well as both<br />

the N- <strong>and</strong> C-terminal regions <strong>of</strong> BinA are involved<br />

in the interaction <strong>of</strong> the two components leading<br />

to the binding <strong>of</strong> BinA in the same regions as BinB,<br />

was supported by early in vivo binding studies using<br />

nontoxic deletion mutants <strong>of</strong> the crystal toxin (Oei<br />

et al., 1992). The same authors also showed that the<br />

Bin toxin is only internalized when both components<br />

are present. However, further intracellular<br />

investigations are required to determine whether<br />

one or both components are internalized.<br />

In vitro binding assays, using 125 I-labeled activated<br />

crystal toxin <strong>and</strong> brush border membrane<br />

fractions (BBMFs) isolated from susceptible or nonsusceptible<br />

mosquito larvae, confirmed this hypothesis.<br />

Indeed, direct binding experiments with<br />

C. pipiens BBMFs indicated that the toxin binds<br />

to a single class <strong>of</strong> specific receptor (Figure 5, left;<br />

Nielsen-LeRoux <strong>and</strong> Charles, 1992). No significant<br />

specific binding was detected with BBMFs from<br />

A. aegypti (Figure 5, right), which is consistent<br />

Figure 4 (a) Midgut <strong>of</strong> C. quinquefasciatus larvae only fed with<br />

fluorescently-labeled BinA. BinA weakly binds over the entire<br />

midgut. (b) Larvae fed with fluorescently-labeled BinA <strong>and</strong><br />

unlabeled BinB; BinA binding is restricted to the gastric caecae<br />

<strong>and</strong> posterior stomach. am, anterior stomach; gc, gastric caeca;<br />

pm, posterior stomach. (Micrographs kindly provided by Dr<br />

C. Berry, Department <strong>of</strong> Biochemistry, Cardiff.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!