01.02.2013 Views

Insect Control: Biological and Synthetic Agents - Index of

Insect Control: Biological and Synthetic Agents - Index of

Insect Control: Biological and Synthetic Agents - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

238 6: The Spinosyns: Chemistry, Biochemistry, Mode <strong>of</strong> Action, <strong>and</strong> Resistance<br />

49 <strong>and</strong> 50) (Table 3). The 3 0 -O-vinyl analog (compound<br />

47) could represent a very active configuration,<br />

but stability issues resulted in erratic results<br />

(Crouse et al., 2001). Other modifications to the<br />

alkyl chains (halogenation, introduction <strong>of</strong> another<br />

oxygen, etc.) were generally not as effective as the<br />

simple alkyl chains (compounds 55 <strong>and</strong> 57) (Crouse<br />

et al., 2001) (Table 3). While the optimum in 3 0 -Oalkyl<br />

chain length for lepidopterous larvae such as<br />

H. virescens (Crouse et al., 2001), beet armyworm<br />

(Spodoptera exigua) <strong>and</strong> cabbage looper (Trichoplusia<br />

ni) (data not shown) is between two <strong>and</strong><br />

three carbons (e.g., compounds 46, 48, 53 <strong>and</strong> 54),<br />

the optimum for aphids such as A. gossypii extends<br />

to four carbons (compound 51) (Crouse et al., 2001)<br />

(Table 3). Unlike either aphids or lepidopterans,<br />

the longer chain 3 0 -O-alkyl groups (C2–C4) (compounds<br />

46, 48, <strong>and</strong> 51, respectively) were essentially<br />

equivalent in activity for T. urticae (Table 3) <strong>and</strong><br />

were only modestly more active than spinosyn A.<br />

Interestingly, the 2 0 ,3 0 ,4 0 -tri-O-ethyl analog<br />

(compound 62) is essentially as potent against<br />

H. virescens larvae, A. gossypii, <strong>and</strong> T. urticae as<br />

the 3 0 -O-ethyl derivative (compound 46) (Table 3),<br />

further supporting the importance <strong>of</strong> the 3 0 -position<br />

<strong>of</strong> the rhamnose to insecticidal activity.<br />

In addition to modifications to the tri-O-methylrhamnose<br />

moiety, the effects <strong>of</strong> rhamnose replacement<br />

with other sugar <strong>and</strong> nonsugar moieties were<br />

also investigated (Anzeveno <strong>and</strong> Green, 2002).<br />

These studies demonstrated that very little change<br />

around the rhamnose moiety is tolerated. Replacement<br />

sugars such as d-rhamnose, the b-anomeric<br />

rhamnose, furanose, <strong>and</strong> forosaminyl analogs (not<br />

shown) were much less active or inactive against<br />

H. virescens larvae <strong>and</strong> T. urticae (Anzeveno <strong>and</strong><br />

Green, 2002). In contrast, removal <strong>of</strong> the methyl<br />

group at the 6 0 -position (l-lyxose analog, compound<br />

85) had little effect on activity relative to<br />

spinosyn A, while addition <strong>of</strong> hydroxy to the<br />

6 0 -methyl group (l-mannose, compound 86)<br />

provided a very significant improvement in activity<br />

over spinosyn A (Anzeveno <strong>and</strong> Green, 2002), nearly<br />

equaling that <strong>of</strong> the 3 0 -O-ethyl analog (compound<br />

46). Replacement <strong>of</strong> the tri-O-methylrhamnose<br />

with nonsugar moieties such as simple alkyl groups<br />

or methoxy-substituted benzoyl groups (compounds<br />

not shown) all were found to be inactive (Anzeveno<br />

<strong>and</strong> Green, 2002).<br />

6.7.4. Quantitative Structure–Activity<br />

Relationships <strong>and</strong> the Spinosyns<br />

The above examples (see Sections 6.7.1–6.7.3) clearly<br />

demonstrate that very significant improvements in<br />

activity <strong>of</strong> the spinosyns are possible, both in terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> potency towards a particular pest or group <strong>of</strong><br />

insect pests <strong>and</strong> greater spectrum. These improvements,<br />

especially those involving rhamnose ring<br />

modifications, were facilitated through the<br />

application <strong>of</strong> both classical <strong>and</strong> less conventional<br />

CAMD techniques early in the project. The QSAR<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> the spinosyns conducted using artificial<br />

neural networks directly led to the identification <strong>and</strong><br />

synthesis <strong>of</strong> far more potent spinosoids than had<br />

been seen up to that time (Sparks et al., 2000a,<br />

2001; Anzeveno <strong>and</strong> Green, 2002). The analysis<br />

identified several potential modifications to<br />

improve activity, including the lengthened alkyl<br />

groups on the rhamnose, <strong>and</strong> also pinpointed the<br />

3 0 -position as the most important for activity (Sparks<br />

et al., 2000a, 2001). While the neural net-based<br />

QSAR was able to identify useful targets for synthesis,<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing the physicochemical basis<br />

for the improved activity is not a question easily<br />

addressed with neural nets (Sparks et al., 2001).<br />

Thus, more classical approaches have also been<br />

employed. Hansch-style multiple regression analysis<br />

(Kubinyi, 1993) <strong>of</strong> the spinosyns <strong>and</strong> spinosoids<br />

was able to establish some relationships between<br />

insecticidal activity against H. virescens larvae <strong>and</strong><br />

several physicochemical parameters.<br />

Among the spinosyns, the biological response <strong>of</strong><br />

H. virescens larvae was best described by the three<br />

whole-molecule parameters, CLogP, Mopac dipole<br />

(dipole moment <strong>of</strong> the whole spinosyn molecule),<br />

<strong>and</strong> HOMO (highest occupied molecular orbital)<br />

(Sparks et al., 2000b):<br />

Log Hv LC50 ¼ 2:18 CLogP þ 0:61 Mopac dipole<br />

þ 2:89 HOMO þ 33:74<br />

r 2 ¼ 0:824; s ¼ 0:372; F ¼

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!