31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Congestion <strong>and</strong> Road Pricing 79<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are problems with Thompson’s views, however. For<br />

one thing, they assume far too much. How can we ever know, in<br />

any particular case, <strong>of</strong> “general agreement” with the proposition<br />

that the price will be so high as to deter all potential motorists<br />

from the C.B.D.? Second, even if there is “general agreement,”<br />

there still may be some consumers with nonaverage tastes who<br />

might willingly patronize the C.B.D. roads, even at what are considered<br />

to be outrageously high prices by most people.<br />

But let us even suppose that at any one time Thompson is<br />

right, <strong>and</strong> that no one actually would willingly pay the very high<br />

prices needed for access to the city streets. Still, a ban is not a<br />

good approximation <strong>of</strong> a price system. For someone could change<br />

his mind about the benefits <strong>of</strong> such travel compared to their costs,<br />

<strong>and</strong> decide to patronize the road. Under a price system, what<br />

would happen would be akin to any slow-, or non-selling,<br />

highly-priced item suddenly rising in the estimation <strong>of</strong> the consumers:<br />

more <strong>of</strong> it can be sold. But under an outright ban, the<br />

whole system will have to be dismantled in order to allow this<br />

change in consumer rankings to be translated into action. It is<br />

only if we assume perfect initial knowledge, <strong>and</strong> no changes in<br />

consumer preferences thereafter, that the Thompson approximation<br />

makes sense. But these are truly heroic assumptions.<br />

Roth48 has set out four criteria for judging systems which<br />

seek to reduce highway congestion. First, selectivity: a system<br />

should be able to distinguish those road users whose needs for<br />

the service are immediate <strong>and</strong> pressing from those whose needs<br />

are <strong>of</strong> a lesser intensity. Second, flexibility: it should discourage<br />

use <strong>of</strong> crowded roads only, not <strong>of</strong> empty ones. Third, practicability:<br />

it should be “simple, fair, cheap <strong>and</strong> enforceable.” Fourth,<br />

remediability: the system should be able to pinpoint the trouble<br />

spots, <strong>and</strong> act automatically to remove them. And how do automobile<br />

bans, or a system <strong>of</strong> partial bans, stack up? Says Roth:<br />

48 Roth, Paying for <strong>Roads</strong>, pp. 70–71.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!