31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Congestion <strong>and</strong> Road Pricing 75<br />

the rush. Instead, they will travel closer to the time <strong>of</strong> their<br />

actual preference. Thus as traffic capacity increases, there is a<br />

shortening <strong>of</strong> the rush hour, but very little reduction in congestion<br />

during the new shorter peak-hours <strong>of</strong> travel. 42<br />

It would appear that the “build more roads” solution to traffic<br />

congestion cannot withst<strong>and</strong> the force <strong>of</strong> the “equilibrium”<br />

argument leveled against it. But before we move on, let us consider<br />

a possible criticism. We have already stated that the market,<br />

unlike the government, looks upon “congestion” as a simple case<br />

<strong>of</strong> excess dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong>, in effect, “rolls up its sleeves in glee” in<br />

the anticipation <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itable sales. In other words, the<br />

market exp<strong>and</strong>s seemingly to meet excess dem<strong>and</strong>s. Why then,<br />

when the government tries to “exp<strong>and</strong>” its <strong>of</strong>fering, by building<br />

more roads, does it fail so dismally <strong>and</strong> apparently so inevitably?<br />

<strong>The</strong> answer lies in the concept <strong>of</strong> price: when charges are prohibited,<br />

i.e., when there is a zero price for highway use, then <strong>and</strong><br />

only then, attempts to build our way out <strong>of</strong> congestion are<br />

doomed to failure. As long as highway services are “free”—as<br />

long as people pay for them whether they use them during peak<br />

periods or not, <strong>and</strong> pay no more for this use than for nonuse—<br />

then the “equilibrium” phenomenon will tend to consign to failure<br />

all attempts to cure congestion by adding to the highway<br />

42 Bish <strong>and</strong> Kirk, Economic Principles <strong>and</strong> Urban Problems, p. 139. See also<br />

Anthony Downs, Urban Problems <strong>and</strong> Prospects (Chicago: Markham Publishing,<br />

1970), p. 176; William Vickrey, “Maximum Output or Maximum<br />

Welfare? More on the Off-Peak Pricing Problem,” Kyklos 24 (May 1971): 305,<br />

Thompson, A Preface to Urban Economics, p. 334; Meiburg, “An Economic<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> Highway Services,” pp. 648, 653; Wohl, “Must Something Be<br />

Done About Traffic Congestion?,” p. 406; <strong>and</strong> Sam Yagar, “Potential<br />

Dem<strong>and</strong> Response to Improved Roadway Service,” Traffic Quarterly (January<br />

1973): 133. Gabriel Roth, Paying for <strong>Roads</strong>: <strong>The</strong> Economics <strong>of</strong> Traffic Congestion<br />

(Middlesex, Engl<strong>and</strong>: Penguin) objects as follows: “It is doubtful<br />

whether cities as we know them today could ever be designed to accommodate<br />

all the vehicles that would appear if free uncongested roads were<br />

made available to them” (p. 15).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!