31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

74 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Privatization</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Roads</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Highways</strong><br />

Additional accommodation creates additional traffic. <strong>The</strong> opening<br />

<strong>of</strong> a freeway designed to meet existing dem<strong>and</strong> may eventually<br />

increase that dem<strong>and</strong> until congestion on the freeway<br />

increases the travel time to what it was before the freeway<br />

existed. 41<br />

A definitive explanation is given by Bish <strong>and</strong> Kirk:<br />

If people would really like to travel at uncongested speeds during<br />

the journey-to-work hours, just how much additional highway<br />

investment would be necessary? If one looks at engineering<br />

forecasts for freeway travel before the freeway opens <strong>and</strong><br />

the actual freeway travel shortly after opening, one is continually<br />

amazed at the lowness <strong>of</strong> the peak-hour forecasts relative<br />

to actual travel. Far in advance <strong>of</strong> the time predicted, the new<br />

freeway has traffic beyond “capacity” <strong>and</strong> is congested again.<br />

Why does this happen over <strong>and</strong> over again? <strong>The</strong>re are essentially<br />

two reasons. First, there is usually more than one highway<br />

route to work that takes approximately the same amount<br />

<strong>of</strong> time. This is because if any route were significantly quicker,<br />

travelers would shift to that route, increasing its congestion<br />

while reducing congestion on the formerly slower route until<br />

times were equalized. Thus, when a new route opens up, traffic<br />

using a variety <strong>of</strong> former routes will switch to the new route<br />

until travel time on the new route is equalized with time on<br />

adjacent routes. If former routes have been city streets <strong>and</strong> the<br />

new route is a freeway, equilibrium may not be established<br />

until freeway traffic is very slow <strong>and</strong> congested. However,<br />

travel time will be less on both the new <strong>and</strong> old routes because<br />

<strong>of</strong> the increase in highway capacity.<br />

But these gains, even in reduced travel time, if not in reduced<br />

congestion, are likely to be dissipated. Bish <strong>and</strong> Kirk continue:<br />

A second reason why new routes congest prior to forecast is<br />

simply that when transportation capacity increases <strong>and</strong> peakhour<br />

time decreases, fewer drivers will take the trouble to beat<br />

41 Dyckman, “Transportation in Cities,” p. 143. See also Owen, <strong>The</strong> Metropolitan<br />

Transportation Problem, p. 109.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!