31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

70 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Privatization</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Roads</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Highways</strong><br />

expected to fall in happily with the builder’s desires for assurances<br />

concerning future supply <strong>of</strong> service.<br />

<strong>The</strong> only way congestion can occur in this kind <strong>of</strong> operation<br />

is if one or both sides commit a serious error. Abstracting from<br />

the possibility <strong>of</strong> below equilibrium transportation prices, congestion<br />

might take place either because <strong>of</strong> overbuilding compared<br />

to the amount <strong>of</strong> transportation services in operation, or<br />

from an undersupply <strong>of</strong> the latter relative to the quantity <strong>of</strong> residential<br />

units in existence. But this is no cause for alarm. For the<br />

market contains self-correcting devices to deal with mistakes<br />

which are unfortunately the lot <strong>of</strong> mankind, at least on this side<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Garden <strong>of</strong> Eden.<br />

If congestion occurs on the free-market transportation network,<br />

the response is likely to resemble what accompanies<br />

“excess dem<strong>and</strong>” for any other good or service: the businessman<br />

does not rest day or night until he provides the extra services the<br />

market is clamoring for. (We again abstract from the possibility <strong>of</strong><br />

price increases.) <strong>The</strong> ice cream shop with long lines <strong>of</strong> people<br />

waiting for admission hires additional workers as soon as possible;<br />

the economist who “suffers” from the “congestion” <strong>of</strong> large<br />

numbers <strong>of</strong> people clamoring to engage him as a consultant hires<br />

more staff or exp<strong>and</strong>s output in whatever way seems appropriate<br />

to him. Throughout the private economy “congestion” is<br />

looked upon as a golden opportunity for expansion <strong>of</strong> output,<br />

sales, <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>its. It is only in the public sector that the customer<br />

clamoring for additional service is looked at askance, 33 blamed,<br />

excoriated, <strong>and</strong> told to desist in his efforts. 34<br />

Owen’s contentions concerning the desirability <strong>of</strong> central<br />

planning for transportation are likewise without merit. It is true,<br />

as he contends <strong>and</strong> as we have seen, that transportation technology<br />

is uncoordinated with “total development strategy.” But this<br />

is not because <strong>of</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> “comprehensive plans”; it is due to a surfeit<br />

<strong>of</strong> such government involvement in the economy. <strong>The</strong> fate <strong>of</strong><br />

33 See Rothbard, For a New Liberty, p. 197.<br />

34 See the section below on banning automobiles.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!