31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Congestion <strong>and</strong> Road Pricing 57<br />

But congestion is too seldom seen as a direct, if harsh, form <strong>of</strong><br />

economizing; we economize on urban transportation plant <strong>and</strong><br />

equipment (social capital) by crowding many vehicles on a narrow<br />

street or by carrying st<strong>and</strong>ing passengers in packed buses.<br />

Through congestion, the commuter trades his time for lower<br />

fares, fees, or taxes; the lost time may be regained only at the<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> additional investment in transportation plant <strong>and</strong> equipment.<br />

19<br />

A constant refrain in these passages is that solving the problem<br />

<strong>of</strong> congestion would be quite all right; however, to do this<br />

would involve the expenditure <strong>of</strong> monies, <strong>and</strong> this would be<br />

unjustified. But is it not true that the solution <strong>of</strong> any problem<br />

usually calls for the undertaking <strong>of</strong> some costs? And do we usually<br />

let this fact, <strong>and</strong> this fact alone, deter us? It may well be<br />

asked, “What is so special about congestion that, upon hearing<br />

that its solution may well call for the expenditure <strong>of</strong> resources,<br />

we must at once conclude that to do so would be unjustified?”<br />

Also implicit in this treatment is the assumption that somehow,<br />

somewhere, at some time (perhaps in the long distant past),<br />

some people were actually asked to choose between something<br />

like the present levels <strong>of</strong> congestion, for free, <strong>and</strong> a vastly<br />

improved, uncongested rush hour situation, for some appreciable<br />

costs—<strong>and</strong> chose the present situation. But this is the merest<br />

fiction. Despite the allegiance this assumption has been able to<br />

garner, there is not the slightest bit <strong>of</strong> veracity to it.<br />

Of course, on the market, people are continually choosing<br />

between (usually) lower priced but more crowded conditions,<br />

<strong>and</strong> more expensive, less congested alternatives. <strong>The</strong>y do this in<br />

their daily choices to patronize, or not, a crowded fast food chain,<br />

a bargain sale at a local department store which they expect will<br />

attract large crowds, etc. <strong>The</strong> problem with our road network, in<br />

this regard, is that there is no functioning market in which the<br />

19 Wilbur R. Thompson, A Preface to Urban Economics (Baltimore, Md.:<br />

Johns Hopkins Press, 1968), p. 333.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!