31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Free-Market Transportation: Denationalizing the <strong>Roads</strong> 33<br />

the competition <strong>of</strong> its rivals <strong>and</strong> the greater the number <strong>of</strong> fairly<br />

close substitutes for its product, the more elastic will a firm’s<br />

average revenue curve be. As usual, it is possible to be precise<br />

about limiting cases. One limiting case will occur when there<br />

are so many competitors producing such close substitutes [the<br />

perfectly competitive model] that the dem<strong>and</strong> for the product<br />

<strong>of</strong> each individual firm is infinitely elastic <strong>and</strong> its average revenue<br />

curve is a horizontal straight line. This will mean that the<br />

firm can sell as much <strong>of</strong> its product as it wishes at the ruling<br />

market price. If the firm raises its price, then, owing to the ease<br />

with which the same, or a very similar, product can be bought<br />

from competitors, it will lose all its customers. If the firm were<br />

to lower its price, it would be swamped by orders from customers<br />

wishing to take advantage <strong>of</strong> its price reduction. <strong>The</strong><br />

dem<strong>and</strong>—<strong>and</strong> the elasticity <strong>of</strong> dem<strong>and</strong>—for its product would<br />

be infinite. 22<br />

Under these conditions, competition in the usual sense <strong>of</strong><br />

opposition, contention, rivalry, etc., would be completely lacking.<br />

Where is the need to attract the customers <strong>of</strong> other firms to oneself<br />

if each so-called “competitor” can “sell as much <strong>of</strong> its product<br />

as it wishes at the ruling market price?” Why go out <strong>and</strong> compete<br />

if one is guaranteed all the customers one could possibly<br />

want? If “competition” is supposed to indicate rivalrous behavior,<br />

one would think that “perfect competition” would denote a<br />

sort <strong>of</strong> super-contentiousness. Instead, through dint <strong>of</strong> misleading<br />

definition, it means the very opposite: a highly passive existence,<br />

where firms do not have to go out <strong>and</strong> actively seek customers.<br />

Again, we can see that rejecting the possibility <strong>of</strong> perfect competition<br />

for a roads industry is by no means equivalent to conceding<br />

that there can be no rivalrous competition between the<br />

different road owners. Paradoxically, only if perfect competition<br />

22 Alfred W. Stonier <strong>and</strong> Douglas C. Hague, A Textbook <strong>of</strong> Economic <strong>The</strong>ory,<br />

3rd ed. (New York: John Wiley <strong>and</strong> Sons, 1964), p. 104.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!