31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

An Interview with Walter Block 417<br />

process <strong>of</strong> trying to obtaining it. That is, I am going to keep trying,<br />

at exactly the same pace, no matter what the prospects are.<br />

My reasoning has little to do with the likelihood <strong>of</strong> success. I do<br />

it because I think it’s my moral obligation to do it, because I want<br />

to pass onto the next generation the flag, or the torch or the banner<br />

that’s been passed onto me, <strong>and</strong> because it is just so much fun.<br />

However, you’ve asked me a civil question, so I suppose I<br />

should take a hack at it. So, here goes. I’m a pessimist on the outlook<br />

for liberty. I think humans are hard-wired, based on sociobiological<br />

consideration, to be anti-freedom. We, as a species,<br />

have lived for millions <strong>of</strong> years in groups <strong>of</strong> twenty to thirty in<br />

caves <strong>and</strong> forests, where markets couldn’t, or anyway, didn’t<br />

function. As a result, I contend, we are not biologically built to<br />

appreciate markets. Every time I get a new freshman class, I have<br />

to demonstrate to their utter amazement <strong>and</strong> consternation that<br />

minimum wages don’t help the poor, that free trade does, that<br />

markets, not welfare, help the poor, etc., etc. I think the reason for<br />

this is not merely the TV programs they’ve seen, or children’s<br />

books (for how, then, do we explain them?) but rather that our<br />

species is biologically biased against economic freedom. It will<br />

always be a hard slog to promote liberty. Looking back over history,<br />

over the entire world, there are very few instances <strong>of</strong> freedom<br />

we have had. Yes, two hundred years ago in the U.S. <strong>and</strong><br />

Great Britain; but these were aberrations. As social scientists, we<br />

do not have to explain these statistical outliers; rather, we have to<br />

account for the 99.99 percent <strong>of</strong> human history where freedom is<br />

not an ideal. It is perhaps a testimony to the libertarian movement<br />

that the freedom philosophy has rarely been stronger<br />

throughout all <strong>of</strong> history, but in only a dozen or so countries.<br />

What are the best means <strong>of</strong> attaining freedom? Well, I’m a<br />

methodological individualist on this (as on most things). That is,<br />

different strokes for different folks. Some will best be convinced<br />

by folk songs, or movies, or novels (e.g., Atlas Shrugged). Some by<br />

teachers <strong>and</strong> writers (my own comparative advantage, plus this<br />

best suits my personality). Some by political parties, or by a move<br />

to New Hampshire, or by setting up a new country.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!