31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

408 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Privatization</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Roads</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Highways</strong><br />

WALTER BLOCK: Zoning authorities; bureaucrats in charge <strong>of</strong><br />

l<strong>and</strong> use; the Environmental Protection Agency; the Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Transportation; the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.<br />

QUESTION: How would the private ownership <strong>of</strong> roads affect<br />

metropolitan commuters? Would the costs to use streets go up?<br />

Would congestion problems decrease, remain the same, or diminish?<br />

WALTER BLOCK: Road privatization would help everyone,<br />

except for bureaucrats, politicians, “civil servants” employed by<br />

present statist road managers, etc. I claim that the cost <strong>of</strong> street<br />

use would decrease. See the “rule <strong>of</strong> two” mentioned above. Congestion<br />

problems would decrease, as peak-load pricing (charging<br />

more during rush hours than at 3 a.m., which irons out the variations<br />

in dem<strong>and</strong> during the day) would become the order <strong>of</strong> the<br />

day. Right now, the government engages in anti-peak-load pricing,<br />

which exacerbates the problem. <strong>The</strong>y commonly sell<br />

monthly tickets to bridges, tunnels, etc. at a cheaper price per trip<br />

than otherwise. But who uses such tickets? Employees, not casual<br />

shoppers, visitors. And when do they use these tickets? Precisely<br />

during rush hours.<br />

Nor is this any accident. <strong>The</strong> principle holds true (congestion<br />

is a government failure) in many other cases too. Compare congestion<br />

during Christmas with the post <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>and</strong> private firms.<br />

<strong>The</strong> former tell you not to mail during the peak-load times; the<br />

latter roll up their sleeves, put on extra workers, <strong>and</strong> satisfy consumers.<br />

QUESTION: How can you reconcile burrowing under someone’s<br />

property with such issues as mineral rights? At what point<br />

above <strong>and</strong> below do property rights stop?<br />

WALTER BLOCK: <strong>The</strong>re are two theories on this. <strong>The</strong> first, the<br />

erroneous one, is called the ad coelum doctrine. Here, if you own<br />

an acre <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> on the surface <strong>of</strong> the planet, you own territory<br />

right down to the center <strong>of</strong> the earth, in narrowing circles; e.g.,<br />

your property comes to a point there (along with everyone<br />

else’s). In effect, you own a cone (think ice cream cone) <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong>,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!