31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

An Interview with Walter Block 407<br />

<strong>The</strong> one exception is that lawsuits for pollution would be<br />

much easier with private rather than public roads. No longer<br />

would you have to sue millions <strong>of</strong> separate auto owners. Now,<br />

you could sue one or just a few road owners for being bawdy<br />

houses, not <strong>of</strong> sex, but <strong>of</strong> aiding <strong>and</strong> encouraging pollution on<br />

their property, which then leaks out onto other people’s property.<br />

1<br />

QUESTION: Will there be a role for government in “urging”<br />

private property owners to sell their l<strong>and</strong> to road construction<br />

companies? Building a large highway, for exampl, can be a<br />

daunting task. If property owners hold out <strong>and</strong> refuse to sell their<br />

property to a road company, the whole project could grind to a<br />

halt. Can government step in <strong>and</strong> encourage the sale—much the<br />

same as with the railroads <strong>of</strong> the 1800s using the government<br />

right <strong>of</strong> eminent domain?<br />

WALTER BLOCK: Eminent domain is totally <strong>and</strong> completely<br />

inconsistent with free enterprise <strong>and</strong> libertarianism. It amounts<br />

to no more <strong>and</strong> no less than l<strong>and</strong> theft. <strong>The</strong> whole point <strong>of</strong> my<br />

(<strong>and</strong> my son’s) debate with Gordon Tullock was on this issue. He<br />

said that private road ownership would be impossible without<br />

eminent domain laws (expropriation as it is called in Canada),<br />

<strong>and</strong> I (we) denied this. In a nutshell, our argument was that it is<br />

possible to burrow under holdouts’ property or bridge over it,<br />

without violating their property rights. 2<br />

QUESTION: In the United States, what bureaucratic encumbrances<br />

<strong>and</strong> agencies would st<strong>and</strong> in one’s way if they were to<br />

actually start a company that intended to purchase, own <strong>and</strong> control<br />

all roads <strong>and</strong> streets in an entire state?<br />

1See on this the magnificent Murray N. Rothbard, <strong>The</strong> Ethics <strong>of</strong> Liberty<br />

(Atlantic Hightl<strong>and</strong>s, N.J.: Humanities Press, 1982).<br />

2See also Walter Block <strong>and</strong> Richard Epstein, “Debate on Eminent<br />

Domain,” NYU Journal <strong>of</strong> Law & Liberty 1, no. 3 (2005): 1144–69. Listen to it<br />

at www.mises.org/multimedia/mp3/Block-Epstein.mp3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!