31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

374 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Privatization</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Roads</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Highways</strong><br />

Inadvertently, perhaps, Mohring provides evidence for the<br />

fact that private-enterprise road operation is very robust. He<br />

states:<br />

the California Private Transportation Company (CPTC) built an<br />

expressway in the median strip <strong>of</strong> heavily traveled State Route<br />

91 (SR 91) which connects Orange <strong>and</strong> Riverside Counties in<br />

Southern California. Fearing monopolistic excesses, the California<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Transportation (CalTrans) attached strings to<br />

the right to build SR 91. It required lower—initially zero—tolls<br />

for vehicles with more than two passengers <strong>and</strong> limited the rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> return that CPTC may earn. 41<br />

<strong>The</strong> fact that a private enterprise, CPTC in this case, could<br />

even contemplate remaining in business under these very onerous<br />

conditions is ample testimony to its ability. At the best <strong>of</strong><br />

times, it is difficult for entrepreneurs to compete with government;<br />

for the latter can give away their product for free, <strong>and</strong><br />

finance their losses out <strong>of</strong> tax revenues, while this option is not<br />

open to the former. Can you imagine if there were government<br />

restaurants where meals could be had for free, <strong>and</strong> still private<br />

providers were able to turn a pr<strong>of</strong>it? Surely this would constitute<br />

strong evidence for the viability <strong>of</strong> the one, <strong>and</strong> the absence <strong>of</strong><br />

such for the other.<br />

Another difficulty with Mohring’s presentation is that he<br />

supports the notion that CalTrans “feared monopolistic<br />

excesses.” What is this other than the pot calling the kettle black,<br />

when the former, but not the latter, is <strong>of</strong> that color? If there is any<br />

“monopoly” in this scenario, it is surely CalTrans, not CPTC. It is<br />

CalTrans, not CPTC, that can endure in business even if rejected,<br />

totally, by consumers. It is CalTrans, not CPTC, that can force<br />

travelers to finance it through taxation. It is CalTrans, not CPTC,<br />

that is prevented from bankruptcy, no matter how poor a job they<br />

do. It is CalTrans, not CPTC, that can manage its roads so that<br />

people die like flies on their premises, without any necessary<br />

41 Ibid., p. 162.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!