31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

344 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Privatization</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Roads</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Highways</strong><br />

government criminals who prevent private entrepreneurs from<br />

setting up road <strong>and</strong> highway businesses, <strong>and</strong> the contrary-to-fact<br />

conditional, selfsame private entrepreneurs who would set up<br />

road <strong>and</strong> highway businesses were they only allowed to do so by<br />

law. So the question: “does liability fall on the l<strong>and</strong>owner for an<br />

accident involving two other parties on his premises?” must be<br />

answered for only these two, government criminals33 <strong>and</strong> private<br />

entrepreneurs, not any “ordinary criminals.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> first issue has already been answered: yes, the road<br />

socialists cause some 40,000 highway fatalities, <strong>and</strong> they are<br />

morally, <strong>and</strong> should be legally, responsible for all <strong>of</strong> them. Suppose<br />

now a system <strong>of</strong> private highways on which, say, five thous<strong>and</strong><br />

people die annually. Should the private road owners be<br />

legally responsible for any <strong>of</strong> them? It all depends upon the contract<br />

in operation between these entrepreneurs <strong>and</strong> their customers.<br />

If nothing at all is specified, we must resort to implicit<br />

contracts, a dangerous legal arena. But, while we cannot fully<br />

<strong>and</strong> confidently predict the operation <strong>of</strong> a now nonexistent highway<br />

industry, it seems altogether likely that the private road<br />

owners would insist upon contracts not holding themselves<br />

liable for whatever few fatalities still occurred in this venue. That<br />

being the case, White’s question can be answered definitively: in<br />

the free society, no street owner would be liable for any traffic<br />

deaths that occurred on his premises.<br />

This, <strong>of</strong> course, is not to deny that present day courts would<br />

have none <strong>of</strong> this. Given our litigious society, there is no doubt<br />

that private road owners would be subjected to all sorts <strong>of</strong> law<br />

suits by those who had been hurt in traffic accidents. 34 It is<br />

unlikely in the extreme that judges <strong>of</strong> this ilk would allow such<br />

33I apologize for the continual use <strong>of</strong> this phrase. I find I am quite unable<br />

to resist.<br />

34If you can sue gun manufacturers for crimes committed with their<br />

product, there is no limit to the search for deep pockets or for perversions<br />

<strong>of</strong> liability. See on this Rothbard (1982b).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!