31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

342 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Privatization</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Roads</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Highways</strong><br />

sense they are not, if voluntarily entering a government highway<br />

ipso facto constitutes a waiver <strong>of</strong> liability claim against accidental<br />

fatality. In a sense they are, if government has legally<br />

prohibited potential highway entrepreneurs from <strong>of</strong>fering<br />

alternative roads. 28<br />

Again, White takes on the role <strong>of</strong> apologist for governmental<br />

depredations. Of course the apparatus <strong>of</strong> the state “has legally<br />

prohibited potential highway entrepreneurs from <strong>of</strong>fering alternative<br />

roads.” 29 <strong>The</strong> road socialists could scarcely maintain their<br />

monopoly over this vital comm<strong>and</strong> post <strong>of</strong> the economy were<br />

this not true. This being the case, it is exceedingly difficult to see<br />

how motorists can be considered to be “voluntarily entering a<br />

government highway.” Nor is it possible to see how an act taken<br />

under duress can “constitute a waiver <strong>of</strong> liability claim against<br />

accidental fatality.”<br />

Here is the scenario. First, the government banishes, by legislative<br />

fiat, all chance at relatively safe private roads, leaving as<br />

the only alternative governmental, hell-hole highways. <strong>The</strong>n,<br />

given that it would be impossible for masses <strong>of</strong> people to travel<br />

on nongovernment road <strong>and</strong> street options such as helicopters,<br />

motorists venture out onto these booby trapped traffic arteries<br />

<strong>and</strong> are slaughtered like flies. Along comes White who asserts<br />

that, since the put upon public “voluntarily enter[ed] a government<br />

highway, [this] ipso facto constitutes a waiver <strong>of</strong> liability<br />

claim against accidental fatality.” Using “logic” <strong>of</strong> this sort, we<br />

can conclude that if a gunman forces a victim to jump to his death<br />

<strong>of</strong>f the ro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> a skyscraper by threatening to shoot him if he does<br />

not, the latter “voluntarily” plunged to the concrete below. No.<br />

When government precludes private highways by threatening<br />

violence against all those who would provide these services, <strong>and</strong><br />

as a result the people have little or no alternative but to patronize<br />

these death traps, we may not at all conclude that their<br />

28Ibid. 29Ibid.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!