31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

332 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Privatization</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Roads</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Highways</strong><br />

laissez-faire capitalism for roads, say, 50,000 would perish; then,<br />

far from the government being liable for any deaths at all, it<br />

would be credited for saving 10,000 per year. Alternatively, suppose<br />

that with private property highway firms managing this<br />

resource, only 15,000 would lose their lives. <strong>The</strong>n, by subtracting<br />

this amount from the extant figure (40,000 – 15,000 = 25,000) we<br />

deduce that government was responsible for killing only 25,000,<br />

not 40,000 people.<br />

Let us now attempt to analyze this situation <strong>and</strong> lay blame<br />

for highway fatalities where it belongs. We do the blaming, not<br />

for the sake <strong>of</strong> blaming, but, rather, in an attempt to ameliorate<br />

conditions. We can scarcely achieve improvement if we are not<br />

clear as to the cause <strong>of</strong> this calamity <strong>of</strong> roadside deaths.<br />

So, is it likely that private enterprise would be run more efficiently<br />

in this regard than the public sector <strong>and</strong> thus kill fewer<br />

people? It is difficult to definitively arrive at any such conclusion,<br />

since what we are involved in is a contrary-to-fact conditional: at<br />

present, government owns <strong>and</strong> manages the roads. But if this<br />

were not so, <strong>and</strong> if, instead <strong>of</strong> the status quo, somehow entrepreneurs<br />

were to take over these reins, then what would be the highway<br />

death toll? To appreciate the difficulty <strong>of</strong> any such extrapolation,<br />

imagine the scenario wherein wristwatches were always<br />

manufactured by government, <strong>and</strong> now the private sector was<br />

about to take over. <strong>The</strong> questions would come thick <strong>and</strong> fast,<br />

with no obvious answer: how many companies would go into<br />

this business? What would their pr<strong>of</strong>its be? Where would they<br />

locate? Would wrist b<strong>and</strong>s be made <strong>of</strong> leather or metal, <strong>and</strong><br />

would these two industries be vertically integrated or not (e.g.,<br />

would one firm manufacture the former, <strong>and</strong> another the latter,<br />

or would both come under the auspices <strong>of</strong> only one company)?<br />

What proportion <strong>of</strong> watches would feature Mickey Mouse, be<br />

waterpro<strong>of</strong>, or feature stopwatches? Would these timepieces be<br />

sold outright, or be given as gifts to people who opened bank<br />

accounts? <strong>The</strong> reason these questions cannot be answered beforeh<strong>and</strong><br />

is because they are essentially entrepreneurial issues, not<br />

economic ones. <strong>The</strong> answers can only emerge in a market, <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!