31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

312 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Privatization</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Roads</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Highways</strong><br />

If you look back at the chain <strong>of</strong> title <strong>of</strong> almost any existing<br />

piece <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong>, you will find that some time in the past there was<br />

a forcible disposition <strong>of</strong> a previous owner, <strong>and</strong> you are buying<br />

the title which descends from that forcible disposition. This is<br />

particularly obvious in the case <strong>of</strong> the United States. It should be<br />

pointed out that, in general, the Indian tribes that we displaced<br />

had a few generations earlier displaced other Indian tribes.<br />

Locke, the actual originator <strong>of</strong> the argument that you get title<br />

by mixing your labor with unowned l<strong>and</strong> wrote the constitution<br />

for the colony <strong>of</strong> South Carolina, which displaced a number <strong>of</strong><br />

Indians. It was also a slave colony, although apparently Locke<br />

didn’t approve <strong>of</strong> that.<br />

But to return to the road problem, perhaps it is easiest to<br />

underst<strong>and</strong> if we consider the situation when the railroads were<br />

introduced. <strong>The</strong>y would all be built on a long thin piece <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong>,<br />

hence, the railroad charters usually had restrictions on the full<br />

title to it. <strong>The</strong> state governments took over the previous rules for<br />

canal <strong>and</strong> railroads. Basically, there was a general permission for<br />

anybody to build another railroad across an existing railroad,<br />

normally by condemning a right <strong>of</strong> way sometimes as a sort <strong>of</strong><br />

price on the permission to build the railroad. Of course, roads<br />

<strong>and</strong> canals have the same privileges.<br />

<strong>The</strong> extension <strong>of</strong> this rule to other forms <strong>of</strong> transportation<br />

including pedestrian traffic is obvious. When pipelines <strong>and</strong> then<br />

later electric, high-tension lines came in, they were also given the<br />

same privileges. Ultimately, a new <strong>and</strong> improved technology for<br />

moving coal, slurry pipelines, was invented which wasn’t mentioned<br />

in existing legislation. <strong>The</strong> proponents went to Congress<br />

to see if they could get the current laws amended. <strong>The</strong>re then followed<br />

a vast battle <strong>of</strong> lobbyists which, unfortunately, the railroads<br />

won so that we have no slurry pipelines. No one seems to<br />

have tried building a very high bridge or drilling a tunnel under<br />

existing railroads, although most pipelines are built underground.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Blocks’ position is one which I run into occasionally from<br />

what I call the real, private ownership enthusiasts. <strong>The</strong>y just

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!