31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

290 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Privatization</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Roads</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Highways</strong><br />

A better reply to this objection is to note that the difficulty<br />

stems not from the privatization process itself, but rather from<br />

the initial takeover by the government <strong>of</strong> the road building<br />

industry. <strong>The</strong> reason the l<strong>and</strong>locked property owner must deal<br />

with the new, private road owner, if there is to be a new, private<br />

road owner, emanates from the very logic <strong>of</strong> the situation.<br />

Like it or not, the l<strong>and</strong>locked property owner, at present, is<br />

logically compelled to deal with the abutting road owner, which<br />

happens to be the state apparatus. <strong>The</strong> reason internal l<strong>and</strong>owners<br />

are forced to deal with road owners, whoever they are, private<br />

or public, is part <strong>and</strong> parcel <strong>of</strong> geographical praxeology.<br />

Absent tunneling under the road, or building a bridge over it—<br />

that is, if we confine ourselves to two-dimensional space—<br />

Euclidian geometry, not man made law, m<strong>and</strong>ates that homeowners<br />

somehow “deal with” road owners. All that privatization<br />

will do is change the identity <strong>of</strong> the institution, from public to<br />

private, that Euclid “forces” the l<strong>and</strong>owner to be related to, contractually.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!