31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

288 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Privatization</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Roads</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Highways</strong><br />

property value. If a man truly owned the value <strong>of</strong> his property,<br />

as opposed to a bundle <strong>of</strong> rights pertaining to its physical inviolability,<br />

then one could forbid all <strong>of</strong> these other economic actors<br />

(including that man himself) from independent decision making,<br />

lest any <strong>of</strong> them, horrors, act in such a way, by purchasing<br />

or failing to purchase, for example, a complement or substitute.<br />

To take another instance: under the doctrine <strong>of</strong> sanctity <strong>of</strong> property<br />

values, not physical property, society would have the right<br />

to forbid blacks from making real estate purchases in previously<br />

white neighborhoods, on the assumption they drive down property<br />

values, a manifest injustice <strong>and</strong> rights violation against<br />

them.<br />

Fourth, there is a market remedy, readily available, to any<br />

individual who is unduly worried about the impact <strong>of</strong> the management<br />

style <strong>of</strong> the new private road firm on the value <strong>of</strong> his<br />

real estate holdings: take a position in this very company; buy<br />

shares in it; kick out the inept manager, <strong>and</strong> install your own<br />

team. This is thus hardly a serious objection to the transition to<br />

a private road industry.<br />

Fifth, there is nothing unique about roads in this regard. <strong>The</strong><br />

“problem” <strong>of</strong> a firm affecting the property values <strong>of</strong> its neighbors<br />

is hardly limited to the case <strong>of</strong> streets. Rather, it is ubiquitous. If<br />

the bakery next door to my butcher shop does a l<strong>and</strong>-<strong>of</strong>fice business,<br />

some <strong>of</strong> his customers are bound to find their way onto my<br />

own premises. If, in contrast, he can’t cook his way out <strong>of</strong> a paper<br />

bag, there will be fewer customers <strong>of</strong> his I can snare to my own<br />

benefit. And vice versa. Does this means that once the government<br />

nationalizes bakeries <strong>and</strong> butcher shops, this negative<br />

externality argument would prevent the denationalization <strong>of</strong><br />

these industries? Not a bit <strong>of</strong> it.<br />

Coercion. Next, we consider the objection that the homeowner<br />

is required to accept a contract with the new road owner. <strong>The</strong> difficulty<br />

here, <strong>and</strong> the force <strong>of</strong> the objection, is not that the contract<br />

may not be a fair, just or appropriate one. And, as we have seen<br />

above, this legal agreement would attempt to incorporate into it<br />

protections for the property holder against blockades.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!