31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

284 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Privatization</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Roads</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Highways</strong><br />

due consideration would have to be given to this hypothetical<br />

contrary-to-fact bargaining over egress <strong>and</strong> access. How, in turn,<br />

might this be done? One possibility is to look at the market value<br />

<strong>of</strong> rights <strong>of</strong> way in arenas where this is subject to open <strong>and</strong> free<br />

bargaining, <strong>and</strong> then to incorporate this knowledge into newly<br />

privatized roads. For example, Christopher Muller notes that,<br />

with regard to his railroads, “James J. Hill encouraged settlement<br />

by letting immigrants travel halfway across the country on his<br />

railroad for ten dollars if they would settle along the route. He<br />

rented entire families freight cars for little more money.” 4 <strong>The</strong><br />

point is, if this railroad magnate was attempting to attract people<br />

to live on territory abutting his holdings, he must have <strong>of</strong>fered<br />

them inducements to do so. Borrowing a leaf from his <strong>and</strong> other<br />

such <strong>of</strong>fers would be <strong>of</strong> help in solving our present challenge.<br />

Continues Muller: “Unlike other railroad builders such as Cornelius<br />

V<strong>and</strong>erbilt who built their railroads around a population,<br />

Hill built a population around his railroad.” Precisely. But if you<br />

are going to do this sort <strong>of</strong> thing, you must make attractive <strong>of</strong>fers<br />

to would-be future neighbors.<br />

Scale. Another possible problem in road privatization stems<br />

from dangers involving the scale <strong>of</strong> holdings. In order to put this<br />

difficulty into context, we must reflect upon yet another objection<br />

to road privatization: that the motorist would have to stop in<br />

front <strong>of</strong> each house <strong>and</strong> pay a few pennies in tolls, which would<br />

grind traffic to a virtual st<strong>and</strong>still.<br />

<strong>The</strong> implicit assumption behind this objection is that roads<br />

would be given out piecemeal; each property owner abutting a<br />

street would receive a section <strong>of</strong> it stretching from one end <strong>of</strong> his<br />

property to another, <strong>and</strong> extending halfway into the thoroughfare;<br />

the other half would be given to his across the street neighbor.<br />

But nothing could be further from the truth. No reasonable<br />

privatization scheme would divide up the streets in so monstrously<br />

unjust, to say nothing <strong>of</strong> inefficient, manner. First <strong>of</strong> all,<br />

4http://www.railserve.com/JJHill.html; I owe this citation to Sam<br />

Bostaph.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!