31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Transition to Private <strong>Roads</strong> 283<br />

Blockades. One argument for the thesis that roads are different,<br />

<strong>and</strong> thus either cannot or should not be privatized, or, if so,<br />

that special provisions applicable nowhere else must apply here,<br />

is based upon the “blockade problem”: if the four streets surrounding<br />

the block in which my home is located are privatized,<br />

then I can be blockaded in, or entrapped. Alternatively, I can be<br />

made to pay such a high price for egress <strong>and</strong> access to my own<br />

property that virtually the entire capital value <strong>of</strong> it would end up<br />

being captured by these private road owners, e.g., the “entrapping”<br />

firm or firms will charge a fee just below the present discounted<br />

value <strong>of</strong> the house. We know that this scenario could not<br />

occur in the natural operation <strong>of</strong> a free market in road provision<br />

(see chapter 1). No one would purchase such a home, initially,<br />

unless access <strong>and</strong> egress rights were first stipulated, <strong>and</strong> at a<br />

mutually agreeable price, at present <strong>and</strong> in the future as well. Just<br />

as “title search” is now the order <strong>of</strong> the day in real estate transactions,<br />

so, too, would “access search” come to be a commonplace<br />

in the free society earmarked by private roadways. This<br />

being the case, no proper disbursement <strong>of</strong> public streets into private<br />

h<strong>and</strong>s could ignore this issue. For, to do so would in effect<br />

be to give to the private road owners not only the streets themselves<br />

which is part <strong>of</strong> the explicit privatization plan, but also<br />

(the value <strong>of</strong>) virtually all the property “entrapped” by these traffic<br />

arteries. What, then, could be done to obviate such a monumental<br />

injustice? One possibility would be to add a codicil to the<br />

transfer <strong>of</strong> the roads (however else effectuated); to wit, that due<br />

weight would have to be given to the contrary-to-fact, hypothetical<br />

bargaining over these access rights that would have, but did<br />

not, take place, since no private road market existed. Here, the<br />

new private firms would own the street, but they would be subject<br />

to the side order constraint that they gr<strong>and</strong>father in all extant<br />

property owners abutting their newly owned roads. As for complete<br />

newcomers to the area, e.g., those traveling through it for<br />

the first time or those who purchase real estate lying within the<br />

bounds <strong>of</strong> these recently privatized avenues, they could be<br />

charged as much as the market will bear. But, for those already<br />

established, <strong>and</strong> also their visitors, repairmen, deliverymen, etc.,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!