31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Transition to Private <strong>Roads</strong> 281<br />

present state <strong>of</strong> government ownership <strong>of</strong> such transportation<br />

arteries to one <strong>of</strong> complete privatization? We shall answer this<br />

question in two stages: the first, very briefly, since there is a large<br />

extant literature on this subject <strong>and</strong> the second, much more intensively,<br />

since there is not. <strong>The</strong> first stage <strong>of</strong> our analysis, then, is<br />

addressed to the issue <strong>of</strong> what is the appropriate transition<br />

process for privatizing any resource? <strong>The</strong> second seeks to answer<br />

the question <strong>of</strong> how can this be applied to the special challenges<br />

which arise with regard to road privatization?<br />

PRIVATIZATION IN GENERAL<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are several methods that can be utilized regarding any<br />

governmental holding, such as a factory or forest. <strong>The</strong> worst one,<br />

always, from the libertarian point <strong>of</strong> view, is to sell the resource<br />

to any willing buyer. This is because a sale implies that the state<br />

will receive money in return for “its” property. But the government<br />

has no wealth at all but that which was seized from individual<br />

owners in the first place. It may “own” the resources in<br />

<strong>The</strong> Freeman (March 1985); idem, “Intraurban Road <strong>Privatization</strong>,” Transportation<br />

Research Record (1987): 1107; idem, “Using Competition to Break<br />

the U.S. Road Monopoly,” Heritage Foundation (December 14, 1987); idem,<br />

“<strong>Privatization</strong>: Saving While Serving the Public,” Goldwater <strong>Institute</strong><br />

(April 25, 1988); idem, “Taking Over the <strong>Roads</strong>,” Liberty (November 1988);<br />

idem, “Why We Need Highway <strong>Privatization</strong>,” Laissez Faire <strong>Institute</strong><br />

(March 1991); idem, “Private <strong>Highways</strong>? <strong>The</strong>y’re Cheaper, Better, Fairer,”<br />

Phoenix Gazette, 3 April, 1991; idem, “<strong>The</strong> Rationale for Toll <strong>Roads</strong>: You Get<br />

What You Pay For,” Phoenix Gazette, 16 December 1992; idem, “Highway<br />

<strong>Privatization</strong>: What Are the Benefits for Arizona?,” Goldwater <strong>Institute</strong><br />

(December 1992); idem, “From <strong>Highways</strong> to Buy-Ways,” Spectrum (Fall<br />

1993); idem, “Highway Investment Analysis,” Arizona Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Transportation (December 1994); idem, “Privatize Driver’s License, Registration<br />

System,” Tribune, 25 December, 1994; idem, “Privatizing Vehicle<br />

Registrations, Driver’s Licenses <strong>and</strong> Auto Insurance,” Transportation Quarterly<br />

(Fall, 1995); idem, “Selling the <strong>Roads</strong>: Privatizing Transportation Systems,”<br />

Liberty; idem, “Goodbye, DMV,” Liberty (January 1996); idem, “Selling<br />

the <strong>Roads</strong>: Privatizing Transportation Systems,” Liberty (1996).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!