31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

244 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Privatization</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Roads</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Highways</strong><br />

blockades. Indeed, this model serves principally as an entirely<br />

refutable objection to the whole idea <strong>of</strong> private roads. 9<br />

It follows, then, that no abutting real estate holder may establish<br />

such a chokehold over any street. If so, how is ownership to<br />

be divided? Clearly, the best way would be to accord with the<br />

practice <strong>of</strong> ancient road enterprises: to set up a joint stock company<br />

composed <strong>of</strong> these 1,000 people, who together would control<br />

the entire venture. This in turn leads to another question:<br />

would each <strong>of</strong> the 1,000 own an equal 1/1,000 <strong>of</strong> a share <strong>of</strong> the<br />

corporation, or would the division be unequal?<br />

<strong>The</strong> latter is far more in keeping with homesteading theory<br />

than the former. That is, a building that stretches along Broadway<br />

from 55th to 56th Street is far more valuable than the same<br />

physical structure occupying the area between 155th to 156th.<br />

Naturally, the former would have more <strong>of</strong> a stake in Broadway<br />

than the latter. Were a road company to be set up de novo, it is<br />

inconceivable that the shares would be apportioned according<br />

to mere physical length. Based on these considerations, the<br />

ownership rights over Broadway would be distributed in a<br />

manner proportional to the assessed valuation <strong>of</strong> the property<br />

in question.<br />

This leaves open the question <strong>of</strong> whether the stock company<br />

should own lengthwise, or in terms <strong>of</strong> geographical areas. That<br />

is, should a company own all <strong>of</strong> Broadway or 3rd Avenue, or 23rd<br />

Street or 42nd Street (the one dimensional format), or should one<br />

be assigned to Greenwich Village, another to Hell’s Kitchen, a<br />

9 According to this proposal, any two owners located opposite <strong>of</strong> each<br />

other could together convert their little patch <strong>of</strong> road into a park. This<br />

would very much diminish the ability <strong>of</strong> the street to convey traffic. This is<br />

not to say that streets ought never be converted to parks. Economic efficiency<br />

would require that this occur only when the value <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>and</strong> as a<br />

park exceeds that used as a street. When one entity owns the entire length<br />

<strong>of</strong> a street it will be in a position to internalize the externalities that might<br />

otherwise come into play.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!