31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Homesteading City Streets:<br />

An Exercise in Managerial <strong>The</strong>ory 243<br />

serve as only the most indirect <strong>of</strong> evidence for use <strong>of</strong> any specific<br />

street.<br />

Under these conditions, the most accurate assessment might<br />

well be derived through proxy. That is, we can assume that all<br />

residents <strong>of</strong> Manhattan use its streets to a certain, specific degree,<br />

call it X, <strong>and</strong> those in the surrounding areas to a lesser degree,<br />

say, X/3. Or, as a rough approximation, that all <strong>of</strong> the inhabitants<br />

<strong>of</strong> the entire city (or each <strong>of</strong> the residents <strong>of</strong> all five boroughs) are<br />

the legitimate owners <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> their respective streets.<br />

Based on these considerations, we are faced with two, very<br />

different implications, <strong>and</strong> thus two, very different ways <strong>of</strong> distributing<br />

the thoroughfares to the people. On the one h<strong>and</strong>, the<br />

owners <strong>of</strong> the property alongside the road own it; on the other,<br />

all members <strong>of</strong> the society own one quotal share each.<br />

But we have only begun to encounter complications. Another<br />

one concerns how the properties shall be divided up on the basis<br />

<strong>of</strong> either <strong>of</strong> these criteria. To wit, consider one long street in Manhattan,<br />

e.g., Broadway, which runs the entire length <strong>of</strong> the isl<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Suppose there are 10,000 separate properties that abut this<br />

avenue. Do each <strong>of</strong> these 10,000 property owners assume control<br />

over 1/10,000 <strong>of</strong> the entire facility? Or do they each own that little<br />

bit <strong>of</strong> it that touches upon their property? (In this case, every<br />

real estate holder would own exactly half <strong>of</strong> Broadway affronting<br />

his property, <strong>and</strong> the other half would be given to the owner<br />

across the street.)<br />

<strong>The</strong> latter option is clearly infeasible. With 10,000 separate<br />

owners <strong>of</strong> Broadway, this avenue would quickly become impassible<br />

to traffic. Each individual, particularly if he could get the<br />

cooperation <strong>of</strong> the man across the street, would be able to bring<br />

motorists to a st<strong>and</strong>still. Streets would come to resemble a<br />

Parcheesi board, <strong>and</strong> blockades could become the order <strong>of</strong> the day.<br />

This option must be rejected, but not only because <strong>of</strong> its<br />

undoubted impracticality. Fortunately, for our underlying homesteading<br />

theory, roads could never have been built in the first place<br />

in any such manner, for the same reason: initial susceptibility to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!